At
a boy’s school in England in the late 20th century, a student named
Turlough (Mark Strickson) steals the antique car of his math teacher, the
former UNIT Brigadier, Alistair Lethbridge-Stewart (Nicholas Courtney), and
proceeds to total it.
Thrown
from the vehicle, Turlough experiences a vision of the Doctor’s long-time enemy,
The Black Guardian. This sinister individual
promises to help Turlough escape from his life on Earth if only he will murder
the Doctor.
Meanwhile,
the TARDIS encounters a colossal spacecraft that has been trapped in a “warp
ellipse” around Earth for three thousand years.
A metamorphic symbiotic regenerator -- a device apparently stolen from
the Time Lords -- is aboard it. The Doctor
meets the ship’s denizens including Mawdryn (David Collings), who claims that
his people stole the device in hopes of becoming immortal. But instead of merely granting immortality,
the machine mutated them. The eight crew
members will live forever, but suffer mortal pain for eternity too.
The
aliens hope to die, but need the help of a Time Lord to do so. They want to steal his eight regenerations so
they can rest in peace. Meanwhile, the
Doctor must determine why the Brigadier seems to have forgotten their mutual
history…
I
am not the world’s most ardent admirer of 1980s Doctor Who, I should
state right out the gate.
I feel that
the last great era of the series, pre-2005, is Tom Baker’s first four years in
the role, which featured a strong accent on Lovecraftian space horror.
The
series grew increasingly absurdist and comical in tone both during and after
the Key to Time saga, and an absurdist Doctor, frankly, has no reason to exist
at all. If all of life in the cosmos is
but meaningless and absurd, why devote your life to helping the helpless or
defending the weak from tyranny?
The
Douglas Adams-inspired years of Doctor Who produced at least one
great serial (“City of Death”), to be certain, but otherwise made the Doctor’s
very reason for being obsolete.
When
Tom Baker left the role of the Doctor after seven years, there was an opportunity
for the long-in-the-tooth series to re-trench and change directions. That indeed occurred, and Peter Davison --
the youngest actor to play the Doctor at that point -- became the fifth
incarnation of the Time Lord.
Because
Baker was so widely-loved for his sense of humor and larger-than-life
performances the fifth doctor was a dramatic…pull-back from that aesthetic.
Davison quickly proved much less charismatic, humorous, and discernibly alien than
all previous incarnations. And the
series promptly surrounded this new Doctor with several companions, instead of
just one. This team-up may have been an
attempt to hark back to the Hartnell years, and the “full house” TARDIS we saw
with Ian, Barbara, and Susan.
The
experiment might very well have worked except for a few key points.
First, 1980s Doctor Who is a text-book
reminder that black-and-white photography hides seams very nicely. The monsters, costumes, and sets of the 1980s
era look ridiculously cheap in color.
Some may argue that this is also the case for Tom Baker and Pertwee’s
color era, but they miss a significant point.
The Third and Fourth Doctor are such charismatic, commanding
personalities, that even in the presence of Axons, Zygons or Wirrns, we’re
gazing at the Doctor as much as we are the “monster of the week.”
Remove that command performance for a more
subdued, “human” Doctor like Davison’s mild-mannered incarnation, and suddenly
the unbelievable cheapness of the production is immediately apparent. The Myrka in "Warriors of the Deep" may have gotten a pass in
black-and-white, for instance, but in the basic, uninspiring color photography
of the Davison Era, it’s a horrible, humiliating embarrassment.
All
that history established, the subject of this retrospective, “Mawdryn Undead,” is a relatively strong serial of the
Davison Era (and Season Twenty). It
makes innovative use of a Doctor Who Time Travel conceit first
mentioned in the Pertwee story “Day of the Daleks -- “the Blinovitch Limiting Factor”-- and also features a strong,
affecting performance by Nicholas Courtney as the retired
Lethbridge-Stewart. Best of all, there's a sort of didactic element at work in the story, and so all the elements of the narrative cohere.
Such would not always be the case in 1980s Doctor Who.
The
Brigadier’s sub-plot in "Mawdryn Undead," in particular, reflects Mawdryn’s aspects of story. Both men must choose how to age -- with grace and humility, or with stubborn, violent
resistance -- and so the tale makes a trenchant comment on human nature, and the
quest for immortality.
Better to live a “normal”
human span with dignity and humility, then to risk up-ending nature to live an
eternal life of pain and suffering.
Mawdryn, in threatening Nyssa and Tegan and making the Doctor choose
their fate, demonstrates that in his quest for eternal life he has lost all
sense of decency and fairness. The quest
for more life simply begets…the quest for even more life.
Yet
commendably, “Mawdryn Undead” treats Mawdryn as a sympathetic character,
especially since he is the piece’s villain.
His people stole Time Lord technology (much like another series
character we know…), hoping to reap its benefits, only to live perpetually in
an “undead” state. Now Mawdryn needs to
commit another robbery, this time the "theft" of the Doctor’s future regenerations, to
endure.
Davison gets a terrific moment in this serial when he realizes that to rescue his companions, he must forgo his nature as a Time Lord. He must give up his future as a Time Lord and live as a mortal...just one life to live.
And indeed, in some way, this agonizing decision also reflects the story's commentary about seeking more life than nature has afforded. Davison plays the moment powerfully. For a flash, we see something dark cross his visage -- fear, sadness, or recognition of inevitability? -- and then the Doctor's mask of resolve returns. Davison may not take a larger-than-life approach, but he is still a solid actor. He gives this scene just the right aura of mystery and pathos. Not too much. Not too little. I wish he always had material this good to vet.
The
heart of “Mawdryn Undead” is undeniably the (double) performance Nicholas
Courtney as the former Brigadier. He is
no longer the crisp, commanding military man of the Pertwee years. Though he retains his dry wit and sharp
tongue, Lethbridge-Stewart is clearly older and more melancholy. Courtney also gets some wonderful moments here, for instance when he
remembers old enemies and old friends (such as Sgt. Benton…now a used car salesman),
and it is wonderful to see him in action again.
One
can detect in this story (and in other Davison serials such as “Four to Doomsday”)
a concerted attempt to bring Doctor Who back into the realm of
telling good, solid science fiction stories and morality tales in an almost ensemble
setting. The attempt was noble.
Unfortunately, many other stories of the era
called out, it seems to me, for a strong central presence to hold together all the disparate elements. Davison possesses many virtues as the
Doctor, to be certain, but he does not seem represent the galvanizing figure that the series required in a time of such obvious transition. Tom Baker carried the weaker stories to the finish line in his era. Doctor Who in the 1980s -- following his departure -- mostly limps to that goal.
Delightfully, "Mawrdyn Undead" holds up pretty well for 1980s era Doctor Who. But that may be damning the serial with faint praise...
Gosh a very studied and throughtful journey through Doctor Who with each posting.
ReplyDeleteI suppose now is as good a time as any to ask.
I've been curious about Earthshock and The Caves Of Androzani.
Both were two of Davison's highest ranking episodes on a recent MIGHTY 200 list. Earthshock (#18) features those pesky Cybermen and The Caves of Androzani actually placed at NUMBER 1 as the best episode of Doctor Who of all time.
What is your assessment of that? I've wanted to see them but I have my reservations.
Thank you John.
I've been curious about two Davison entries
Hello, my friend.
DeleteI saw the same list, and there are a lot of howlers on it.
And I can say pretty definitively that Earthshock is not a great or classic show. There are several better Cyberman shows, in fact (namely "The Tomb of the Cybermen.") It's not terrible, but it's not the 18th best serial in Doctor Who history, either.
The Caves of Androzani is legitimately great, but -- if you factor in NuWho -- nowhere near the top twenty, either. It is probably the best Davison serial, but I felt weird featuring his regeneration story as his entry in Doctor Who Week, to be honest. It is a fast-moving, emotionally-powerful serial though, and worth seeing. But again...not in the same class as many of the Nu Whos.
Let me know what you think, if you choose to watch them...and thanks for commenting!
best,
John
Earthshock brought back the Cybermen after a six year absence. Plus it showed brief clips of the First and Second Doctors (who I'd never seen before), and the ending... well, it put the shock in Earthshock. I didn't think it was all that bad. JMHO.
DeleteThanks for the assessments John and Duanne. I will check them out. And John, I completely understand and would never compare classic Who to the Nu Who. It's pretty tough to compete on a pacing level alone.
DeleteBest
sff