While
transporting the remains of his dead rival, The Master, from Skaro to
Gallifrey, the Seventh Doctor’s (Sylvester McCoy) TARDIS experiences a “timing malfunction” and lands on Earth
in the “Humanian Era,” on the eve of
the new millennium, December 30, 1999
Unfortunately,
the malfunction has been caused by the Master himself, who in a strange, slimy
reptilian form, escapes from captivity and moves into the body of an
unsuspecting American paramedic (Eric Roberts).
Upon
venturing out of the TARDIS, the Doctor is almost immediately injured in urban
San Francisco’s gang violence. He is
rushed to a hospital, where a cardiac surgeon Grace Holloway (Daphne Ashbrook)
operates on him. Unfortunately, he
appears to die on the table, though he actually regenerates that night, in the
morgue.
The
new Doctor (Paul McGann) -- suffering from amnesia -- befriends Dr. Holloway,
and together the duo must prevent the Master from opening The Eye of Harmony
inside the TARDIS for the express purpose of stealing all the Doctor’s future
lives…
Worse,
the Master’s plan will destroy Earth’s future, meaning that the world will
stop, permanently, when New Year’s Day, 2000, happens.
An
American co-production with the BBC, the 1996 Doctor Who movie stars
Paul McGann as the eighth incarnation of the Doctor, and also features a
good-sized role for Sylvester McCoy, the seventh Doctor, who hands off the role
to his successor with style and grace.
Like
many
Doctor Who serials of the classic series, the Doctor Who TV movie
functions primarily in “pastiche” mode.
This means, essentially, that it skillfully pulls ideas from popular
productions in the culture, and then blends them together in a new and
frequently amusing fashion.
The
Paul McGann movie, directed by Geoffrey Sax pulls ideas from The
Terminator movie franchise (right down to visual framing, at one point),
the pre-eminent genre franchise of the day, The X-Files (in terms of
an Earth-based mystery involving aliens), and also the increasingly popular
post-modernism of horror genre films such as Wes Craven’s New Nightmare
(1994) and Scream (1996)
In
terms of The Terminator (1984), the Doctor Who features two time
travelers from another culture (otherworldly, rather than the future…) duking
it out on modern-day Earth, while a human bystander is pulled into the
action. The Terminator and the Master both
wear sun-glasses and leather, and both cause much destruction. Both are also endeavoring to re-shape the
future.
The
X-Files,
meanwhile, famously gave 1990s audiences “the black oil,” a kind of sentient
ooze that would crawl up inside of human beings and take them over. Those possessed by the evil of the black ooze
on the Chris Carter would then also boast black eyeballs. In The Doctor Who movie, the Master is seen
as a kind of reptilian ooze, sliming to the TARDIS console, and down the throat
of an unwitting EMT. Similarly, those
possessed by the Master (in this case, Grace), showcase the telltale black eyes
of the oil.
Finally,
the eighth doctor movie explicitly compares the Doctor’s regeneration to the famous
“It’s Alive” moment of revival of the monster in James Whales’ Frankenstein
(1932), which happens to be playing on television during the Time
Lord’s regeneration process.
At
one point the film explicitly cross-cuts from the Monster’s hand twitching to
the Doctor’s hand undertaking the very same motion. The allusion is intriguing, but it ultimately
doesn’t serve as anything beyond a recognition of the fact that the makers of
the movie are aware of pop culture. Is the Doctor being compared to a monster?
Is his regeneration, monstrous? It’s a
nice allusion a beloved old film, but nothing more. The moment would have worked better if the
Master’s resurrection had been intercut with footage from Frankenstein.
Although
Paul McGann is splendid in the role of the Eighth Doctor and certainly deserved
his own long run in the role, his TV Movie isn’t especially good. It looks like what it is: a cheap TV
production circa the mid-1990s. The
special effects haven’t aged particularly well, the acting is generally pretty
bad, and there doesn’t seem to be much by way of budget which could show
audiences anything special. Most of the
action is very tame, and the details surrounding the Eye of Harmony are quite
confusing.
Alas,
the 1996 Doctor Who movie also adds some baffling new ideas to the
long-standing canon.
First
among those is the Doctor’s surprising revelation that he is half-human (on his
mother’s side). This is a shock to say
the least, and may not be accepted as canon by fans. I suspect this was a bone thrown to American
producers so the character would seem “relatable,” or some other such nonsense.
Secondly,
the Master -- though described as a rival Time Lord -- is depicted in his
natural form as a kind of snake or reptile.
We see his reptilian eyes, and his coiled, snake-like body, at
points. What’s this about? If he is a Time Lord, are all Time Lords reptilian?
If the Doctor and The Master are both
Time Lords, why are they physiologically so different from one another? There
are no doubt fan ret-cons for this mystery, but no explanation appears in the
movie.
Finally,
since when is the TARDIS’s chameleon circuit known as a “cloaking device?”
Despite
such stumbles, this Doctor Who TV-movie makes an honorable attempt to continue faithfully
the ideas and characters of the franchise as seen on the BBC series, circa
1963-1989. The Doctor’s old sonic
screwdriver makes an appearance, for instance, and the series even resurrects
an old logo from Jon Pertwee’s era.
Similarly,
the film went to the trouble of casting Sylvester McCoy for the
pre-regeneration scenes, thus establishing a direct link between seventh and
eighth Doctors. Had the filmmakers not
taken this step, the TV movie today would likely be remembered as completely
apocryphal (like the Cushing films of the 1960s).
It’s
also fair to state that this Doctor Who movie pointed the way
towards the re-invention in several regards.
For
one thing, we get a very attractive, young, leading man-type Doctor in Paul
McGann’s incarnation, as we later get with Eccleston, Tennant, and Smith. No grandfatherly or father types, as was the
case with Hartnell and Pertwee.
Also,
the interior of the TARDIS is redesigned here and for the first time actually
looks gigantic, much as it would in the modern era. But the central column is clearly
recognizable, as it remains to this day.
Last
but not least -- and this is probably the most controversial touch -- there’s a
hint of romance here between the Doctor and his companion, Grace. On more than one occasion, the duo locks
lips, and, well, you can pretty easily sense the desire.
Once
more, the new series has picked up on this dimension, with the Doctor and Rose
falling in love, and Martha Jones also falling hard for the Time Lord.
In
the original series, the Doctor never made eyes at any of his beautiful male or
female companions…and there were many, to be certain. In the new show, there seems to be a hint of
romance or attraction between the Doctor and virtually every companion (well,
not Rory…).
Today,
contextualize the McGann movie as a not entirely-effective missing link between
the original series and the new series.
In many ways, it is more nimble and fun than the last seasons on BBC
were, but some aspects -- like the acknowledgment of the Doctor’s human half --
seem way off. The film’s plot-line is
also muddled, and the Doctor’s solution to the closing of the Eye of Harmony
doesn’t seem to make sense in light of what we know about time travel.
Doctor
Who would
not reach its full potential, again, until 2005, and yet I’m still grateful to
have this 1996 movie in the catalog.
Finally,
there is one visual composition in this TV movie that I absolutely love. An amnesiac doctor wanders through an abandoned
wing of a San Francisco hospital, and sees his reflection for the first time…in
eight mirrors. We get eight views of him
with his new face, because, of course, this is his eighth incarnation. I love that moment. It’s as if the mirror is explicitly reminding
him of his long and noble history…
I think the Master's snake appearance is some kind of hangover from the last episode of the original series whereby in the finale of Survival the Master had taken on animalistic tendencies with cat eyes etc. Still doesn't make any sense though. Sylvester McCoy was marvellous at the start of the film , just as Paul McGann was recently in his seven minute regeneration prologue. It's such a shame that writers will only allow these characters dignity and wisdom so long as they are going to die moments later. I love Doctor Who but I am sick of gurning and mugging, I want Pertwee style aloofness and pomposity - this unattractive trait always seemed to me to make the Doctor all the more knowable.
ReplyDeleteYour take on that mirror scene is very perceptive, John! I never noticed it before.
ReplyDeleteI originally found the TV Movie flat out appalling! But in light of the new series, it goes down a lot easier. I also LOVE McGann's Big Finish audio performances, and I'm grateful for the existence of this weird, trans-media, 8th Doctor!
ReplyDelete