In
“Spare Parts” by Jimmy Sangster and Seeleg Lester, two men and one woman
receive vital transplants after the accidental death of Dr. Pritchard (Don
Knight), a world leader in the field of transplant surgery.
After
the operations are complete, however, Pritchard’s malevolent ghost inhabits
each of the recipients in an attempt to force a confession of murder out of his
widow, Ellen (Susan Oliver).
I
must confess here that I’ve never been a big fan of horror stories in which the
organs of the dead manage to take over the minds of the living.
We have seen this familiar story on Rod Serling’s Night Gallery (“The Hand of Borgus Weems”), Quinn Martin’s Tales of the Unexpected (“A Hand for Sonny Blue), and in John Carpenter’s Body Bags (1993) among others. At the movies, the idea has dominated such films as Oliver Stone’s The Hand (1981) and Body Parts (1991).
We have seen this familiar story on Rod Serling’s Night Gallery (“The Hand of Borgus Weems”), Quinn Martin’s Tales of the Unexpected (“A Hand for Sonny Blue), and in John Carpenter’s Body Bags (1993) among others. At the movies, the idea has dominated such films as Oliver Stone’s The Hand (1981) and Body Parts (1991).
My
problem with the story is that transplanted body parts are just…tissue. They have no souls, and bear no life of their
own. They are mere flesh (without
consciousness), and this is settled science.
I have a difficult time suspending disbelief when I see the souls of
serial killers living on in their transplanted eyes/hands/hearts, etc. It just seems silly and willfully ignorant, at
least to me. And I worry that it does real life harm. Organ donor-ship is a great thing, and I'm afraid ignorant beliefs about it prevent some people from donating.
Anyway, “Spare
Parts” involves a ghost whose transplanted larynx, hands, and eyes magically
take-over three normal individuals.
These normal individuals then become mindless minions of the ghost,
carrying out his evil bidding. It is
never explained how the ghost acquired this power of possession. Even worse, the ghost is depicted (in
flashbacks) as a really terrible, abusive man, so you wonder why he was given
this tremendous ability to strike back from the after-life.
In
terms of the story’s particulars, Ellen (Oliver), the ghost’s wife, indeed
murdered her husband, but the episode makes it pretty clear that he had it
coming. It’s not like he was a good man
betrayed by a scheming black widow or something.
Rather, he was an awful man who promised Ellen a life of entrapment, misery and pain. He wouldn’t give her a divorce, and she was left with precious few options except to remain in an unhappy marriage with a monster. I’m not condoning murder, I’m just saying that it’s not like Ellen murdered a good man to go off and have an affair with another man. She was trapped, and she made an escape for herself on immoral (but clearly desperate) terms.
Rather, he was an awful man who promised Ellen a life of entrapment, misery and pain. He wouldn’t give her a divorce, and she was left with precious few options except to remain in an unhappy marriage with a monster. I’m not condoning murder, I’m just saying that it’s not like Ellen murdered a good man to go off and have an affair with another man. She was trapped, and she made an escape for herself on immoral (but clearly desperate) terms.
Why
are we to hate Ellen and root for the evil Pritchard to make her confess? “Spare Parts” never really sells that idea,
and so the story is not entirely successful because we sympathize with Ellen
more than we do with Pritchard.
Also, if everyone can see and hear the ghost of Pritchard anyway, why go to all the trouble of possessing the transplantees? Why not just finger the murderer as a ghost?
Also, if everyone can see and hear the ghost of Pritchard anyway, why go to all the trouble of possessing the transplantees? Why not just finger the murderer as a ghost?
Although
I enjoyed watching the great Susan Oliver in this story, “Spare Parts” lives up
its title in that it feels like a bunch of standard horror elements -- evil transplants, revenge from the beyond
the grave, and ghosts -- in search of a coherent narrative.
Accordingly, this is the weakest Circle of Fear episode in a while, perhaps since “Death’s Head.”
Accordingly, this is the weakest Circle of Fear episode in a while, perhaps since “Death’s Head.”
Next
week: “The Ghost of Potter’s Field”
John strong review for a weak episode. Like the Night Gallery of that era the episodes were not always good for Circle Of Fear.
ReplyDeleteSGB