The eighties, perhaps, exhausted the genre, and audiences were still getting Freddy, Jason and Chucky left-overs as the nineties began.
Before Wes Craven's Scream (1996) set off a new slasher craze, the genre seemed to be
stuck in idle.
The X-Files (1993 - 2002) didn't help, either. Chris Carter and his writers/directors proved that they could create scary, inventive material on a regular basis (and on Friday night, to boot!). Why go out to pay for a scary movie when you could stay home and see something really great for free instead?
One fascinating film from
this time period, mid-nineties, is From Dusk Till Dawn (1996), written by Quentin Tarantino and
directed by Robert Rodriguez. The film
possesses a sleazy, unique vibe, and is one part crime drama, one part horror
blood-bath. It's like no other film I can think of.
Basically,
the movie follows the Gecko Bros. (played by George Clooney and Quentin
Tarantino), two violent crooks who are wanted by the law, and attempt to flee to Mexico.
They take a nice family, the Fullers, hostage, to get across the border. They all end up, however, at an out-of-the way
bar in the desert -- The Titty Twister -- that is home to the nastiest, filthiest vampires you’ve ever
seen.
Suddenly, the scum of the Earth is the only hope for the family's survival.
What
I admire about From Dusk Till Dawn is the way that it takes that sharp turn mid-way
through, going from straight-up exploitation film to twisted, horror exploitation
film. It’s a radical narrative shift,
and one that I feel has thematic purpose and meaning.
The first half of the film showcases psychological evil. Richie (Tarantino) is a pervert and a
murderer. He's one sick bastard.
But then the second half of
the film demonstrates a different kind of evil; a sinister, monstrous, inhuman
form of evil. By comparison, Richie looks like the safest guy in the room, regardless of his proclivities.
All horror movies concern either
the monster within human beings (think Psycho [1960]), or the monster from outside the tribe, who
attacks it (think Alien [1979]). From Dusk Till Dawn cleverly gives
audiences one of each, and that’s a perfect opportunity for an exercise in contrasts.
The
TV series version of From Dusk Till Dawn obviously can’t thrive on a surprise
narrative u-turn, since the film itself is nearly twenty years old at this point. But Robert Rodriguez has accomplished the near-impossible with the TV series. He has
maintained the sleazy, off-kilter vibe (which, frankly, I love, and is enhanced
radically by what seems a low budget…), while simultaneously deepening all of the storylines and characters. The vampires in the series have been given a
mythological basis (in Meso-American myth and legend), and the characters have
also been enriched and developed to a degree that is, frankly, remarkable.
Jacob
Fuller, played in the series by Robert Patrick, now has a fleshed-out
back-story (replete with flashbacks) that help better to explain his loss of
faith and his relaitonships with his children.
Seth (D.J. Cotrona) and Richie
(Zane Holtz) have similarly -- and commendably -- been deepened.
We see some of Seth’s experiences in jail, for instance, as well as a
terrifying moment from his childhood involving his father (James Remar).
And Richie is no longer nerely a capricious sicko, but someone under the “spell”
(literally, it seems) of a supernatural or dark force. Now, as a director, Quentin Tarantino is beyond
reproach in my opinion. He's a personal favorite. But as an actor, he
leaves something to be desired. I always
felt that From Dusk Till Dawn suffers to some degree from his stunt
casting. By contrast, Zane Holtz brings a completely
different -- and much deeper -- vibe to the character. In the film, you could never quite get behind
Tarantino’s murderer and would-be-child predator.
There are reasons, as the first season of the TV series continues, that you may find
yourself drawn to Richie and his journey. We become acquainted not only with his violent streak and urges, but with his sense of intelligence.
In
the act of deepening the characters and the story, Rodriguez has also added
some new personalities.
First among
these additions is Ranger Freddy Gonzalez (Jessie Garcia), an agent of the law
whom we consider a “good guy” as the series commences but who, throughout the first
season, undergoes a literal and metaphorical dark descent. We start out rooting for him, but by the last episodes, we're not so certain anymore.
Adding weight to his odyssey is Don Johnson
in a recurring role as his partner. The first episode
of the series involves a store robbery by Richie and Seth, and pits them
against these new characters, Freddy and Earl. In the
movie, this scene was five minutes in duration, tops.
In the TV sereis, it is 42 minutes, and a pressure-cooker in terms of intensity and
slow-build suspense. And Johnson, the TV veteran, steals the show.
Another
new character, Carlos Madgrigal (Wilmer Valderrama), similarly adds depth
to the series storylines. At first, the audience believes he is simply a criminal. Later,
however, we begin to see who he is, and his developing personality reveals a side of Santanico
Pandemonium (Eiza Gonzalez) that the movie never presented. The only drawback is that he has had the same hair-cut for 500 years if we are to believe the flashbacks.
To
describe From Dusk Till Dawn: The Series another way: it follows beat-for-beat the chronology of the
film.
But it spends more time on each of
those beats, and shows a breadth-and-depth in storytelling that, frankly, I
wasn’t expecting. It mines each moment of a familiar story for new revelations, new twists. You may think you know
how the story is going to turn out, but From Dusk Till Dawn is laced with
surprises and twists that make the story new all over again. The final chapters of the first season, about a
descent into an underground labyrinth, may challenge your understanding of the
characters, and also their place in the scheme of things.
I
am not, generally, one to complain about special effects, but it seems that
From Dusk Till Dawn relies a lot on CGI blood-letting. That may be a hindrance for some viewers, but it didn’t
bother me. There’s a wicked, anarchic
low-budget vibe about this series, and somehow, all the (incredibly excessive) blood floods
contributes to that feeling of unease. The series
regularly treads into bad taste, and has a sense of humor about itself and its
imaginings. I find that charming, I must
admit. It seems spiritually faithful to the film, at least.
Occasionally,
a sour note is struck in terms of dialogue or performance, but more often than not, the series hits the marks it
aims for. One early episode features a pulse-pounding chase through a motel (The Dew Drop), and one spell of
episodes is emotionally-wrenching because it involves a female hostage who is a
Mom and wife, and yet still comes to a very nasty, very gory end. The material in From Dusk Till Dawn, the film, seems to be
to vacillate wildly between exploitation poles, and in its own way, the series
attempts to live up to that ideal.
I
have read some criticisms of the acting too. But after the first season, I don’t
see George Clooney, Tarantino, Juliette Lewis or Harvey Keitel in these familiar roles
any more. The series actors have put
their own imprimatur on these characters in a way that develops them and makes
them their own. I was disappointed,
however, that in one scene about acting, Cotrona’s Seth didn’t mention George
Clooney when he was ticking off the names of great actors (like Marlon
Brando). That would have been the
perfect way to pay tribute to the original film and its cast.
From
Dusk Till Dawn is now in its second season, but I’ve just finished the first. This spell of episodes brings the story to the end, essentially, of the movie, and into new
thematic and narrative terrain. I’ll be fascinated to
see the second season, and see how it plays on the success of the first.
I
very much enjoy The Walking Dead and Penny Dreadful, two horror TV masterpieces. From Dusk Till Dawn is
still young, and it features a completely different vibe from either of those titles. Those series seem more formal in comparison,
somehow.
From Dusk Till Dawn boasts this
transgressive, nasty, gutter vibe that keeps it intriguing. So at this point,
there’s no reason to imagine that the series will do anything but improve and deepen across many seasons.
Hadn't see it for about 10 years, saw the cheap price on the Blue-ray and went for it. Still enjoyed it, great fun if you like the genre. Looked very good in blue-ray though not sure it especially benefits vs. sd since I can't compare. I may try the TV series sometime just wish Joss Weadon had done it ;).
ReplyDelete