In
2005, while I was writing Horror Films of the 1980s for
McFarland, I had the opportunity and honor to interview late director Richard
Franklin (1948 – 2007) about the film I reviewed on the blog today, Link
(1986).
Mr. Franklin was very generous
with his time, and this interview occurred on November 20, 2005.
Some -- though not all -- of this material, appeared in the published book, but I thought it
would be nice, today, to share the back-and-forth as it appeared originally,
only cleaned up for purposes of clarity
The
topic moves from Link to horror movies of the eighties in general.
Muir: Describe the genesis of Link.
Richard Franklin: My landlord (DP Tom Ackerman) on a
spec trip in 1979 showed me the story and I optioned it. It was to have been my
next film after Road Games.
Muir: What was it about this material
that stimulated you as a filmmaker?
Richard Franklin: The opening line in the synopsis: “Someone pulled the head off of Mrs. Murphy’s
cat.” The idea that an animal could be acting like a man acting like an
animal. An ironic spin on Michael Myers and the whole genre. Then learning from
Jane Goodall that there was some truth to this [idea].
Muir: Phillip gives Jane a set of rules to
obey. Was part of the fun of this film giving viewers these rules and then
having characters break them?
Richard Franklin: Shades of Gremlins (1984)!
Muir: Was there a long period of
rehearsal on this film to get the actors and crew familiar with working with
apes?
Richard Franklin: No. We left the apes to Ray
Berwick (who did The Birds [1963]).
Muir: How long was the shoot?
Richard Franklin: Quite long. Fifty-four days.
Muir: How did Link and the other apes
take direction?
Richard Franklin: They could do short (15 – 20 second)
behaviors. And didn’t argue. But [they] lost interest quickly.
Muir: Were there delays?
Richard Franklin: It was a grindingly difficult
shoot. But not because of the apes. I found the English crew very slow and
difficult.
Muir: How did Elisabeth Shue do with her
ape co-stars?
Richard Franklin: I believe she loved them.
Muir: The final chase in the movie is
electrifying. How long did it take to stage and execute?
Richard Franklin: You mean the siege in the house?
Maybe a week. And thank you. No one’s ever said that before.
Muir: Had you storyboarded it all out?
Richard Franklin: Yes. Without that we’d have been
lost. Link has something like three
times the number of shots of any of my other movies.
Muir: I notice there are many long shots
there. Your fluid camera and choice of shots make it clear where everyone is in
relationship to each other.
Richard Franklin. Absolutely! And thanks for
noticing. Maybe I’m a neo-classicist.
Muir: What do you think the film
ultimately says about man/ape relationships?
Richard Franklin: That we are alike – and different.
That civilization (political correctness and the like) is a thin veneer. Yet
that 1% genetic difference makes a HUGE difference.
Muir: What happened regarding the
release of the film?
Richard Franklin: EMI went belly up. Cannon
inherited the film and those guys were absolute bozos.
Muir: I didn’t find it until a home
video release, and I suspect the film wasn’t released theatrically in the
States.
Richard Franklin: It had a small theatrical airing.
Muir: What was the problem, if you
recall? Why did this film get lost and is it still lost, in a sense?
Richard Franklin: Inept distribution. It happens a
lot – particularly to me. Look at Visitors (2003).
Muir: What do you think a student of
films should understand about your sensibilities as a filmmaker?
Richard Franklin: I’m a neo-classicist. [I] believe
traditional mise-en-scene can’t be beaten. [I] hate “wobbly-cam” (aping home
videos) as it draws attention to itself and gets in the way of emotion (cf John
Ford’s idea of “invisible technique,” which you’ll see more of in my later work
like Hotel
Sorrento/Sorrento Beach [1995].)
Muir: Do you think young directors
working today still understand film grammar and how to use it?
Richard Franklin: Somewhat.
Muir: Which of your films in the 1980s
best express your viewpoint as a filmmaker?
Richard Franklin: Psycho II (1983) is the
best anyway.
Muir: If you had to choose one to film
to show a class, which one would it be?
Richard Franklin: I just showed the new [Psycho
II] DVD to a class.
Muir: What do you think of the trend of
slasher films in the 1980s? Was it good for horror, or do you think it was a
blind alley?
Richard Franklin: Maybe good for horror, but not
necessarily “the thriller.” This genre once included North by Northwest (1959),
but psychological suspense like Gaslight (1944) or The
Cat and the Canary (1939) has sort of disappeared in favour of
grue. To me, the best screen murder ever
is Nancy’s in Lean’s Oliver Twist (1948), and the
scariest scene ever is the Indian raid in The Searchers (1956).
Muir: Do you have any favorite horror
films from the decade?
Richard Franklin: Any suggestions? I like Halloween
(1978), but that was the seventies.
Muir: What are about Dressed
to Kill (1980)?
Richard Franklin: Brian is drawn to different values
in Hitchcock’s work from those that attract me.
Muir: The Shining (1980)?
Richard Franklin: Some fantastic moments, but a bit
labored. Kubrick (late in his career) underestimated his audience.
Muir: The Fly? (1986)
Richard Franklin: Fun, in a light way.
(At this point, my questions were all answered.)
Muir: Thanks again for your time!”
Richard Franklin: Hope my ideas do not cause offence.
By all means come back for more…”
No comments:
Post a Comment