A
regular reader, Woodchuck God, asks:
“What would you say are your favorite and
least favorite dystopian visions?”
That’s
a great question, WCG, because the dystopian science fiction film is one of my
favorite cinematic forms.
It
fascinates me to imagine (and watch…) how the world we know could go wrong,
especially since so many such films stem from the idea of trying to improve the
human condition, or to preserve it in the time of a crisis.
But of course,
something goes wrong, and mankind’s condition is actually worsened.
I
find it difficult to limit myself to just five selections, but these are a few of my
all-time favorites:
THX-1138
(1971)
In
this George Lucas film, love itself is outlawed in a world of drugs, personal
confession in “uni-chapels,” a surveillance state, and non-stop shopping.
Meanwhile, the government’s “fantasy
bureau” makes certain that masturbation robots tend to the populace, and the
mantra of the State is “Buy More and Be
Happy.”
Robert
Duvall stars a man who goes off his meds, and falls in love with his roommate
(an echo of a subplot in Orwell’s 1984). Lucas non-conventionally and
routinely breaks up the frame space of his characters here by
focusing obsessively on close-ups of
computer print-outs, insert shots of sine-waves, and minimalist sets. All
of these high-tech shots enhance the impression of a world that has lost
touch with nature; with Mother Nature herself, and human nature too.
This
is a film in which the State encourages personal narcissism by converting the
collective act of worship into a personal, individual one. The State even selects
roommates for people to live with, meaning that conventional families don’t exist. The Lucas film presents a cold, inhuman world about the perils
of turning over the power of the individual to a monolithic, totalitarian government.
Z.P.G.
(1973)
In the world presented by
Z.P.G. (Zero Population Growth), "The
Society" and the "World Deliberation Council"
announce the inception of the "Zero Birth Edict."
For thirty years, no women will be allowed to bear children because of over-population. Women already
pregnant are to be registered with "The Department of State Security" (which sounds a lot like Homeland Security...)
If, during this thirty year ban on child bearing, a woman does become pregnant,
she has two options. She may report to an "Ab Lab" (an
Abortion Lab), or have a home abortion courtesy of a new bathroom
appliance installed in all houses.
If, however, a woman should choose
to go to term and is discovered, she and her husband (and the child too...) are
arrested, then suffocated inside
transparent, mobile tents, in full view of the disapproving
community-at-large. Those citizens who report such "criminals"
are rewarded with bonus food rations, for in this world, child-bearing is
"the gravest crime" imaginable. But one young couple, Russ McNeil
(Oliver Reed) and Carol McNeil (Geraldine Chaplin) breaks the Zero Birth Edict
and decide to conceive a child...
Z.P.G. is a great, highly-underrated film. A grave atmosphere of
despair hangs over the entire picture, and director Michael Campus paints
an unforgettable portrait of a totalitarian society that controls every aspect
of the citizenry's day-to-day life. Most importantly, however, ZPG is worthwhile for the
main questions it zeroes in on. What sacrifice is too great to
save the planet? And secondly, should a single generation be the one
to carry that enormous burden?
The most horrifying and memorable scene in Z.P.G. involves a shop
called Babyland, and the desperation of prospective parents as they meekly
accept plastic automatons as their "children." These child dolls -- who
make whirring, mechanical sounds when they turn to look at you --
are nightmare fodder. They walk, they talk, they demand attention, and
their eyes are as dead as you can imagine.
Soylent Green (1973)
This film starring Charlton Heston is a
gloomy and perhaps prophetic vision of the year 2022. New York City is
populated by some forty million people; 20 million of them out of work. The
city streets are bathed in a nausea-provoking yellow haze, a result
of "the greenhouse effect" (global warming...), and the innumerable
homeless denizens of this urban blight sleep on staircases and in parked cars, all the while suffering in roasting temperatures (the average daily
temperature according to the film is 90 degrees.)
The Big Apple experiences
numerous power black-outs yet it isn't just the city where things have turned
bad. We also learn from the dialogue that the oceans "are dying,"
"polluted," and that there is very little good farmland remaining in
America. Meanwhile, food
supplies are tight, and there is strict rationing of supplies.
In what is
perhaps its most visually-stunning sequence, Soylent
Green escorts
the viewers to an outdoor urban market on a typical Tuesday ("Tuesday is
Soylent Green Day!") and reveals what happens when supplies of food are
exhausted. There's a riot, and a confrontation between helmeted, heavily-armed police forces
and the throngs of starving people. It looks like a WTO riot - times ten
Recently, the Associated Press reported that 50%
percent of the world's population now lives in cities, so Soylent
Green's phantasm
of a stressed, overpopulated City-State, run by a craven politician, Governor
Santini looks markedly more plausible today than it did in 1973; and certainly
the climate-change apocalypse feels more relevant in the Zeitgeist of the 21st
century too.
But where Soylent
Green truly
acquires frisson is as cinematic prophecy. It depicts "Two New
Yorks" (or Two Americas, as Presidential candidate John Edwards once said.) There is no middle-class remaining in New York City. It's extinct. In
this U.S., you're either part of the teeming, homeless, starving masses (who
inhabit every nook and cranny in the metropolis...), or separated from the poor
and the unpleasant squalor of street life in glorious and luxurious apartment
complexes.
There, in spacious air-conditioned quarters, the super-rich play
video games on home consoles (another nice bit of prophecy for 1973...), enjoy
hot and cold running water (another luxury denied the masses), purchase black
market items like real vegetables and beef, and are protected by security
systems.
The Haves and the Have Mores have separated themselves from the rest
of humanity, and ignore their plight.
Rollerball (1975)
In the not-too-distant
future, the world's nations have gone "bankrupt," and the
destructive "Corporate Wars" have come and gone. Now,
corporations "take care of everyone," and the violent team
sport of Rollerball has been created by Big Business to remind people of "the
futility of individual effort." The goal of the corporations in
this dystopia is to be essential to every individual's life, and for "the
few" to make important decisions on "a global basis.”
The film concerns a rollerball
athlete (James Caan) who uses his fame/celebrity to rebel against the system,
and the movie, while being a left-wing exploration of a right wing dystopia
(Big Business run amok), also asserts the absolute primacy of the individual
over a collective. The film’s action scenes are thrilling, and the movie does a
good job of prediction too.
In
particular, the world’s libraries have been digitized and stored in computers, and people
can access only summaries of that data, not the actual data. And you better
have a credit card handy if you want to read.
Welcome to a
world without net neutrality.
Logan’s Run (1976)
This is one of my all-time favorite films,
period. In the 23rd century, the survivors of a nuclear war live
inside The City of Domes, a paradise of plenty. The world is a hedonist’s
delight with the Love Shop and other pleasures, but the metropolis is not
without a downside. Every citizen must
die at age 30, and hope for “renewal” in a state-sponsored ritual called
Carousel that keeps the civilization perfectly balanced.
Policing this edict are a cadre of armed
law enforcement officials, the Sandmen.
One such Sandman, Logan 5 (Michael York) is tasked by the city’s
controlling Computer with determining if the destination of refugees, called
Sanctuary, is real. Logan enlists the
help of a young woman, Jessica (Agutter) in escaping the city, but is tagged as
a “runner” and hunted by his former partner, Francis (Jordan).
Logan’s Run does a fantastic job creating the lingo
or lexicon of an Orwellian state, language designed to lack nuance, and suggest
absolutes. Death is not death, it is “renewal.”
The clock that counts down to your death
is not a death clock, but a life-clock, and so forth.
Similarly, Logan’s Run captures the “bread
and circuses” aspect of many film dystopias.
If you’re getting plastic surgery, hanging out in the love shop, or
shopping in the mall, you are easily distracted from the machinations of the
state.
In terms of my least-favorite dystopias, I
actually can’t think of many dystopian films that I absolutely hate.
Freejack (1991) isn’t a particularly
well-made film, so that might make the list.
In general (and not counting the brilliant Dredd [2012] and Snowpiercer [2014]), I feel that modern filmmakers
have lost the patience to construct a really good, really internally consistent
dystopian world.
The Hunger Games (2012) isn’t bad, necessarily, but it isn’t very good, either. It exemplifies the concept of laziness I note above.
All the characters are well-fed, gorgeous
teenagers who don’t look oppressed or hungry.
The filmmakers' casting choices thus take away from the idea of
dystopia, of people starving, and under the thumb of a dictatorial regime.
We know, from the news, what starvation looks
like. It doesn’t look like Jennifer Lawrence.
She gives great performances as Katniss, but there is a real visual
disconnect between the look of the contestants and the world they supposedly
inhabit. I find it hard to get past that in the films.
Similarly, many modern movies of this type feel
the need to destroy the dystopia in one film, and present a happy ending. They don’t have the balls to let the dystopia
stand (unless a sequel is planned, I guess).
Of the five films I noted, two (Soylent
Green and Z.P.G.) boast what may be termed down-beat endings.
Rollerball’s ending is sort of inconclusive -- a temporary victory, but
not the end of the war. THX-1138 involves the hero’s escape
from the totalitarian city, but the State doesn’t fall.
Only Logan’s Run involves the outright destruction
of the dystopia.
So I guess one element of the dystopian
film that I appreciate most is that the monolithic status-quo is not easily
dismantled. It is self-perpetuating, and infinitely more powerful than those
who rebel against it. I feel this is a great reflection of real life.
In short, I never really
find it believable in these films when a hero goes from ignorant slave of the
state, to total awareness of its “evil,” to rebel who brings it down. That's a long journey, and, realistically, one that often goes incomplete.
Even The Hunger Games gives the hero time
(and several films) to go through that transition. The dystopian films that don’t do it, generally don’t
cut it for me.
Great question!
Don't forget to ask me questions at Muirbusiness@yahoo.com
John excellent analysis. Logan's Run especially stands out. It was an important part of my '70s boyhood with both the 1976 film and the 1977-78 CBS television series.
ReplyDeleteSGB
Great list and analysis as always! I made my list about a year ago and in hindsight would find a way to get "Logan's Run" in there. Anyway, my top five: "Robocop" (1987), “Silent Running” (1972), “Blade Runner” (1982), “The Road Warrior” (1982), “Conquest of the Planet of the Apes” (1972).
ReplyDeleteYou know, something about the "Hunger Games" films...I enjoy them when I am watching them. But never give them a second thought afterwards, where as the films on this list stayed with me for years (and decades!). I think your point about the laziness...the worlds don't feel real or haunt me like these classic films. Of the new dystopian wave, I did enjoy "Divergent", perhaps because I like the books. I am also one of the few people who loved "In Time" (2011).
Nice list John. Very 70s centric I see. :) But the 1970s really seemed to be an era of dystopian and pessimistic science fiction. While some of that seems in play in our current era of films, they really don't seem to willingly embrace that darkness and let the audience face it. I'm sure there are financial reasons for that, but like you said, it feels kinda half assed. If you're going to delve into the darkness of the end of the world... then do it.
ReplyDeleteAhh...the dystopian science fiction film. Often...too often...the science in science fiction is just an afterthought ...mainly because the industry have not figured out another name for totally unbelievable films based on the future....so everything is science fiction.
ReplyDeleteThe films mentioned above make the 1950's look downright diverse. What is it about science fiction films set in so called dystopia's that element all diversity.
Needless to say...sci-fi is not my fave genre, however I have seen a number of the films mentioned above and I do dig the 70's vibe.