As
famous as Agent 007 remains after four decades at the movies, many of his nemeses
remain equally well-known.
Typically, Bond films don’t work very well if the villains don’t measure up; if they don’t present the audience some electric jolt suggesting that Bond -- and the world itself -- might truly be in danger.
We have long since come to expect that Bond will drive fast cars, romance beautiful women, and defeat monstrous enemies, but we also must believe at least a little during the course of the movie that the outcome is in doubt. The best villains help us suspend that disbelief.
Typically, Bond films don’t work very well if the villains don’t measure up; if they don’t present the audience some electric jolt suggesting that Bond -- and the world itself -- might truly be in danger.
We have long since come to expect that Bond will drive fast cars, romance beautiful women, and defeat monstrous enemies, but we also must believe at least a little during the course of the movie that the outcome is in doubt. The best villains help us suspend that disbelief.
There’s
no magic formula for a Bond villain, either.
Some are young, physically-agile Bond “opposites” (as in From
Russia with Love or Goldeneye) while others are brilliant
schemers (like Goldfinger of Blofeld.) Over the years, we’ve also met
genetically-engineered freaks like Zorin (Christopher Walken), drug-dealers
like Sanchez (Robert Davi), and even rabid devotees to a political cause, like Rosa Klebb
(Lotte Lenya).
I’m
going to write-up a separate list for Villain Henchman soon, so this list focuses on
the mastermind or general villains, not the soldiers-types.
5.Ernst Stavro
Blofeld in You Only Live Twice (1967)
I’m
a long-time admirer of the late Donald Pleasence and his many great performances. He was -- rather famously -- in a bad movie or
two (Pumaman,
Warriors of the Lost World) during his time. But Pleasence also made a hell of a villain in films
such as Fantastic Voyage and You Only Live Twice.
Here, the actor appears as Bond’s ultimate
enemy, Blofeld, head of SPECTRE. Scarred and bald, this Blofeld combines physical ugliness – someone once
compared his skull and scars to a “cracked egg” – with an absolute sense of
contempt for anyone other than himself.
The Bond films had a number of very capable actors play Blofeld over the years (Telly
Savalas, Max Von Sydow and Charle Gray, namely), but I have always felt that Pleasence was tops at playing a master manipulator, a man of tremendous intellect and
cunning, but one divorced from the human race in terms of compassion and decency. There's a madness in Blofeld's eyes in this film that makes you think he may just succeed in his plans to start World War III. I wish Pleasence had reprised the role in On Her Majesty's Secret Service and Diamonds are Forever. As the films stand now, there's no sense that we're looking at the same man battling Bond in three different adventures.
4.Maximillian Largo,
Never Say Never Again (1983)
Perhaps
so, but Klaus Maria Brandauer nonetheless created one of the most memorable
characters ever to menace 007 on the silver screen. His version of Largo is playful, witty…and an
absolute ego-maniac.
Temperamental
and jealous as well as brilliant and rich, this Largo is a rather atypical
villain in his three-dimensionality.
Bond (Sean Connery) gets a good read on the character’s competitive
nature and makes a play for his girl, Domino (Basinger) and his money (in a
video game of global “Domination”), all while trying to track down two missing
atomic bombs. Meanwhile, Brandauer
imbues Largo with tremendous individuality, from the moment when he delicately
blows a kiss on his wounded hands (after losing to Bond at the video game which
delivers electric jolts), to the moment he swaps spit with a recalcitrant Domino.
You
can’t exactly state that Brandauer plays the role lightly, but certainly the actor has given
considerable thought to Largo’s world view, from his weird sense of humor to
his casual (class/wealth based?) dismissal of Bond as a kind of lowly
plebian. Never Say Never Again isn’t
heralded widely as a great Bond film, which I believe is something of a mistake. The casting of Brandauer (as Largo) and Carrera (as Fatima
Blush) gives the film a major boost of strange, anarchic, dangerous energy.
3. Dr. Julius No in Dr. No (1962)
Joseph
Wise portrays Dr. No in the Bond film of the same name, the very first Bond
film in the canon, in fact. As the first
of the “bad guys,” Wiseman makes a tremendous impact.
Physically powerful and endowed with destructive, crushing metal hands (because of an accident), he also boasts a cruel, cool intellect. As No, Wiseman set the tone for many of the future Bond villains by memorably terming our hero a “stupid police man.”
Physically powerful and endowed with destructive, crushing metal hands (because of an accident), he also boasts a cruel, cool intellect. As No, Wiseman set the tone for many of the future Bond villains by memorably terming our hero a “stupid police man.”
Brilliant, brutal and condescending, Dr. No is the
first in line to challenge 007, and that prominent positioning alone makes him
special. But there is more to the character than that too. There’s the sense in Wiseman’s Dr. No of
supreme authority and power, backed up by technological know-how, and that Bond may be outmatched in
terms of both brain and brawn.
2. Franz Sanchez
(Robert Davi) in Licence to Kill
(1989)
Timothy
Dalton’s James Bond went up against Davi’s diabolical, physically-intimidating drug
lord, Sanchez in Licence to Kill (1989).
Although I remember vividly at the time of the film's release that some critics were disappointed to see Bond battling a drug baron in South America, I believe that the character worked brilliantly not only because of Davi’s fearsome, intense (method) portrayal, but because the character boasts a psychological frailty.
Although I remember vividly at the time of the film's release that some critics were disappointed to see Bond battling a drug baron in South America, I believe that the character worked brilliantly not only because of Davi’s fearsome, intense (method) portrayal, but because the character boasts a psychological frailty.
For Sanchez, everything comes down to loyalty. I love Licence to Kill because when you get right down it, the film is all about
Bond manipulating and exploiting Sanchez’s feelings about those under his command, playing on his
insecurity about loyalty. Even Sanchez's death -- brought on by the question “don’t you want to know why?” -- is a reflection of
this relentless campaign of psychological manipulation.
Sanchez is a brutal guy, for certain, but he remains a great Bond villain
because of the character’s flawed, human nature. If Sanchez had not been so concerned with
loyalty, he would not have fallen. There’s
something almost Shakespearean or tragic about the character.
1. Auric Goldfinger
in Goldfinger (1964)
Well,
this is a huge surprise, right?
I think everyone knew this selection was coming. But Goldfinger is surely the ultimate James Bond villain, one oft-imitated but never quite duplicated.
A genius, a mad-man, an ego-maniac, and more, Auric Goldfinger, like Sanchez, can be discussed in terms of one key quality: an obsessive love of gold.
Goldfinger is single-minded in his pursuit of gold, and he lets nothing stop him. In part, Goldfinger is so memorable because he doesn’t engage much with Bond directly, not when there's Operation Grand Slam to plan, anyway. Hence his famous retort: “No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die,” or another good quip: “Choose your next witticism carefully, Mr. Bond. It may be your last."
Goldfinger is so single-minded that he can’t quite see that Bond is clever enough to be his undoing and not just a nuisance. I also love the fact that film defines Goldfinger as, essentially, a cheat. He obeys no rules in his quest to control the world's supply of gold, and that kind of obsession/lawlessness makes for a very powerful opponent indeed.
I think everyone knew this selection was coming. But Goldfinger is surely the ultimate James Bond villain, one oft-imitated but never quite duplicated.
A genius, a mad-man, an ego-maniac, and more, Auric Goldfinger, like Sanchez, can be discussed in terms of one key quality: an obsessive love of gold.
Goldfinger is single-minded in his pursuit of gold, and he lets nothing stop him. In part, Goldfinger is so memorable because he doesn’t engage much with Bond directly, not when there's Operation Grand Slam to plan, anyway. Hence his famous retort: “No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die,” or another good quip: “Choose your next witticism carefully, Mr. Bond. It may be your last."
Goldfinger is so single-minded that he can’t quite see that Bond is clever enough to be his undoing and not just a nuisance. I also love the fact that film defines Goldfinger as, essentially, a cheat. He obeys no rules in his quest to control the world's supply of gold, and that kind of obsession/lawlessness makes for a very powerful opponent indeed.
John great choices of Bond villians, number #1 Goldfinger is perfect. I am glad that, like me, you do not consider Connery's Never Say Never Again (1983) anything less than an official Bond film even though it was released the same year as the 'official' Moore's Octopussy(1983). I have always considered it one of the offical 007 films.
ReplyDeleteSGB