The
Twilight Zone
(1959 – 1964) is an anthology series and thus it features no continuing
characters save for Rod Serling’s staccato-voiced narrator. However,
in one memorable circumstance, a character does
recur in the series.
His
name is Mr. Death.
This
distinctive character -- this personification
or embodiment of mortality -- appears in three episodes of The
Twilight Zone: “One for the Angels,” “The Hitch-hiker” and “Nothing in
the Dark.”
And
in each installment Mr. Death serves roughly the same thematic and narrative purpose:
to provoke first fear, and then, finally,
a sense of acceptance about mortality.
In
other words, those characters that come to interface with Mr. Death in The
Twilight Zone first consider him an existential “terror,” but upon
closer contact come to understand that his presence, beyond being inevitable,
is not so dreadful.
In
fact, Mr. Death -- in shape and deed -- is a reminder of the natural order.
My
wife, a psychologist and therapist, often reminds me of her belief that
virtually all Twilight Zone episodes concern Rod Serling’s fear of impending
death or lost youth. So perhaps it is no
surprise that Mr. Death is the only continuing character in the writer’s most
famous canon.
Uniquely,
Mr. Death is never physically depicted on The Twilight Zone as a fearsome “Grim
Reaper”-styled or “Charon”-type creature, but rather as a human being who
appears, well, relatively mundane.
He’s a well-groomed, Don Draper-esque businessman (Murray Hamilton) in “One for the Angels,” a handsome police officer (played by Robert Redford, no less…) in “Nothing in the Dark” and an amused, smiling Hitch-hiker (Leonard Strong) in the scariest episode of the bunch, “The Hitch-Hiker.”
No
matter how, specifically, Mr. Death appears to his prey in a physical sense, he
is first greeted with the emotions of terror, dread and disbelief.
In
“One for the Angels,” an almost-seventy year-old street peddler, Lou Bookman
(Ed Wynn) is shocked to learn that Mr. Death has scheduled him for “departure”
at midnight. He categorically refuses to
accept that Death has come for him, and then attempts to find a technicality in
Death’s “law” that will allow him to remain on Earth.
In
“The Hitch-hiker,” a woman, Nan Martin (Inger Stevens) on a cross-country trip
has (unknowingly) died in a car accident, and keeps seeing the same Hitchhiker
appear on the open road before her. She
grows to dread seeing this figure, and the fear that she feels – and which the audience also feels – is a
throat-clenching one.
In
“Nothing in the Dark,” poor old Wanda Dunn (Gladys Cooper) has spent the last
few years of her long life locked away inside a dark, condemned basement
apartment. She steadfastly refuses to
reckon with the outside world – or any
outsiders – for fear that Mr. Death will come for her should she open her
door even a crack.
All
three cases reflect a similar notion: these
protagonists steadfastly attempt to ignore and defy the fact of their own mortality,
specifically through the recognizable and nearly Kubler-Ross-ian stages of bargaining
(“One for the Angels”), denial (“The
Hitch-hiker”) and even anger (“Nothing
in the Dark.”)
But
by denying and rebelling against death, in fact, The Twilight Zone reminds
us that these individuals may be denying the vibrancy of life itself…the
meaning of our moment-to-moment existence.
The protagonists soon learn the error of their ways. By denying Mr. Death, Mr. Bookman causes an unfortunate chain reaction. Since Death can’t take him, the personification of mortality arranges to take a little girl, Maggie, in his place. Bookman attempts to trick Mr. Death and delay him from this deadly rendezvous, in the process fulfilling a life of dream of making a “big pitch…one for the angels.” He knows that the vetting of this pitch will result in Mr. Death taking him from our mortal coil, but Mr. Bookman is able to see and detect a value greater than his own ending at this point: a little girl’s continued survival. He sees detects how precious life is, especially for the very young. He has already lived; she has not.
Nan
Martin’s epiphany in “The Hitch-hiker” is that death has been her co-pilot all along, at least since her
accident. Mr. Death thus represents a
force she can’t escape from, no matter how fast she drives or how much highway
her car covers. And this realization
too, reflects our human condition. We’re
all mortal, and death is part of the natural order of life. In the
end, we can’t outrun it.
Old
Ms. Dunn in “Nothing in the Dark” learns that her fear of death has cordoned
her off from the rest of humanity unnecessarily. She has tried so hard not to let Mr. Death into
her apartment that her life has hardly been worth continuing, or living. What is life if it is lived in perpetual fear
of “the dark.”
When
Mr. Death “wins” -- as death inevitably
wins -- he is not a gloating, cackling, monstrous victor. Instead, he’s charming, and sometimes
downright soothing. He politely informs
Mr. Bookman that “he’s made it,”
meaning he’ll be going to Heaven. He
tells Nan Martin, without irony that she is “going” his way (a foregone conclusion at that point). And finally, Death offers beautiful,
comforting words for Ms. Dunn:
“You
see. No shock. No engulfment. No tearing asunder. What you feared would come
like an explosion is like a whisper. What you thought was the end is the
beginning.”
That last line suggests Mr. Death’s third “gift.”First he brings fear, then acceptance and finally…transcendence? Mr. Bookman
will go to Heaven…to join the angels, no doubt. Nan Martin too is being taken on a continuing
journey (destination: unknown…), and Ms. Dunn faces not annihilation, but what
Death describes enigmatically as “a beginning.”
Thus in all three Twilight Zone episodes
featuring Mr. Death there exists, at least a little, the specter of hope, of an
existence beyond this mortal coil where humanity can find something…different. Interestingly, other episodes of the series
dwell on what that something different may look like (“A Nice Place to Visit,”
for instance)
But for these three Mr. Death episodes, the most
important thing to focus on is the paradigm he represents. I call it the
inevitability of mortality and the natural order inherent in death.
In some horror films, such as Final Destination (2000), death is viewed as an ominous, vengeful, dark force. What I enjoy so much about The Twilight Zone Mr. Death episodes, however, is the Grim Reaper’s obvious humanity. He is by turns gullible (“One for the Angels”), jocular (“The Hitch-hiker”) and gentle (“Nothing in the Dark”).
In other
words, when Death comes a calling for human beings, The Twilight Zone
promises that he will arrive in forms that we automatically understand,
recognize, and can relate to.
The only proper end to a human life comes from a
death that is also…human.
Message conveyed…in The Twilight Zone.
John well said. One of the many things that I loved about Rod Serling's Twilight Zone was that in these episodes Death was always defined as nothing to fear but one of us just trying to help, a good samaritan of the afterlife. As a boy I first saw the Twilight Zone in reruns the late '70s after watching the new network first-run Rod Serling's Night Gallery. Rod Serling gave us so much.
ReplyDeleteSGB
"Nothing on the Dark" made a big impression on me when I first saw it as a teenager, partly due to the timing (long story, but there was a terminal illness in the family), partly due to the shock of seeing such a young Robert Redford playing what seemed (to me) to be a very incongruous role, but mostly because of the deep streak of compassion and humanity in the story, and in Redford's final speech which you quote. It's a story that begins with suspense and even creepiness and ends up being unexpectedly... gentle. I see this same kindness -- this utter determination to be humane -- in much of The Twilight Zone. It's been years since I saw Serling's follow-up series, Night Gallery, but from what I recall, that sense was missing from that show... which is perhaps why it didn't succeed the way Zone did.
ReplyDeleteAre you familiar at all with Neil Gaiman's Sandman comics? They feature a personification of Death who looks like a cute young Goth girl, and they also have this same underlying core of compassion for the human condition. Makes me wonder if perhaps Gaiman is also a fan of The Twilight Zone...
in " one for the angels", he was both normal, and creepy
ReplyDeleteVery insightful essay. I always enjoyed "One for the Angels"' depiction of death as a bureaucrat. BTW, it's Nan Adams, not Nan Martin.
ReplyDelete