If
ever a movie was the victim of unfortunate timing, it was SpaceCamp (1986), a
summer genre film released thirty years ago this June.
Specifically, the Harry
Winer film premiered just five short months after the space shuttle Challenger
disaster occurred.
As
you may recall, Challenger was destroyed 73 seconds into its flight on
January 28, 1986 because of a problem with a solid rocket booster. All seven of
the crew members died, including school teacher Christa McAuliffe.
Since
SpaceCamp
involves another space shuttle mission, and another accident at NASA to
boot (also featuring a booster, strangely enough…), the movie highlighted unintended
and unfortunate connections to the national tragedy.
Many
film critics, including Roger Ebert, reviewed the film on the basis of the
Challenger trauma. In his review, Ebert wrote:
“The great
looming presence all through this movie is the memory of the Challenger
destroying itself in a clear, blue sky.”
The
association with real-life horror pretty-much killed SpaceCamp in the crib.
It
was intended as a light, bubbly, uplifting
film of no more seriousness or gravitas than any other disposable, would-be
summer blockbuster. And suddenly, it was saddled with comparisons to one of the
worst days of the decade, and in space program history.
In
concept and casting, SpaceCamp was a “teenager” movie in
the age of such teenage science fiction films as Back to the Future
(1985), My Science Project (1985), Explorers (1985) and Weird
Science (1985). This was an era
when Hollywood films were capitalizing on the youth market, and its interest in
the genre.
But
SpaceCamp
wasn’t just a love letter to American youth, but to the space program itself,
and even -- somewhat awkwardly -- Star Wars (1977).
A
box office bomb in its day, SpaceCamp is remembered, if not
wholly beloved, by a generation of fans who discovered it on VHS and found it,
at least, inoffensive. There, on the secondary market, the film cemented a
reputation as a cult film, if not, necessarily, a cult classic.
Today,
SpaceCamp
seems somewhat hokey and far-fetched. The constant references to Star
Wars grow irritating quickly, and don’t naturally fit with the space
program setting.
Actually,
Star Trek jokes would have worked better. Star Trek is about
building a better tomorrow, the study of science, and the conquest of space. Star
Wars is more of a fairy tale (not that there’s anything wrong with
that.)
The
teen drama in SpaceCamp also seems
forced at times, and even the technology seems unreal, since the film posits
space stations and smart robots operating under NASA auspices in the mid-1980s.
In
short, SpaceCamp shouldn’t shoulder the blame because real-life
tragedy pre-empted it.
But
outside its unfortunate context, the film still isn’t particularly well-made, or even all that memorable.
“With
space, anything is possible.”
A
group of teens at NASA’s space camp in Huntsville train for three weeks to
become astronauts, under the tutelage of astronaut Andie Bergstrom (Kate
Capshaw) and ground control operator Zach Bergstrom (Tom Skerritt).
One
student, Kathryn (Lea Thompson) dreams of being a shuttle commander, but is
made the shuttle pilot instead, while the happy-go-lucky Kevin (Tate Donovan)
takes the command post.
Other
students on the team include Tish (Kelly Preston), Rudy (Larry B. Scott), and
Max (Joaquin Phoenix). Max befriends a robot named Jinx.
Jinx
is responsible for the unusual set of circumstances which sees the teenagers,
aboard the shuttle Atlantis, launched into space without preparation…or enough
air.
Now
the teens must work together to get home, and Andie must coordinate and aid
their efforts, making her first voyage into space to do so.
“You’re
all dead because you didn’t work together as a team.”
I’ve
been to the location of Space Camp -- the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in
Huntsville, Alabama -- on two unforgettable occasions.
I
went as a twelve year-old in 1982, and I took my six year old son there for a
return journey in 2012.
It’s a great place, and a destination I was so glad I shared with Joel. I hope I have opportunity to return with my granddaughter or grandson, many years from now.
The
movie version of Space Camp is not such a wholly delightful experience. Variety’s
reviewer opined that the movie “never successfully integrates summer camp
hijinks with outer space idealism to come up with a dramatically compelling
story.”
I
don’t know that I feel that way, exactly. Certainly, the story of argumentative
teens launched into space and having to take part in their own survival can be
described as compelling.
My
issue with the film is slightly different.
SpaceCamp takes too many liberties with
the real life space program to really fulfill its premise that contemporary (and dedicated) 1980s teens could pilot a space shuttle, and get home safely.
In
other words, the film suffers from a different form of schizophrenia than the
one tagged by Variety.
SpaceCamp aims to be
contemporary and real, but then, willy-nilly, throws in technology and details
that are, simply, pure fantasy.
To
wit, the teens rendezvous with a space station under construction that,
conveniently, already has the extra oxygen supplies Atlantis requires.
Here
the space station is called Daedalus, but no such space station existed in the
mid-1980s. A much more primitive station, Skylab had re-entered Earth’s
atmosphere in 1979. And the ISS
(International Space Station) was still more than a decade off. In fact, the only space station in Earth
orbit in 1986 was the Russian Mir.
And
secondly, and perhaps much more to its detriment, SpaceCamp gives us the
comic-relief robot Jinx.
Simply
put, there was no robot capable of such complex thought-processes,
speech-patterns, and emotional reactions (“Friends Forever!”) in 1986.
And
if there were, its presence at Space Camp would have been a gross misuse of such
advanced technology.
I
know that Jinx is cute, and I have nothing at all against cute robots in SF
films. He just seems oddly out-of-place
in a film that is supposed to be about a real, not futuristic NASA.
Also,
I’ll admit that I dislike then near-constant Star Wars references in SpaceCamp.
“What are you an Imperial Guard?” asks
one camper. “I’m not Han Solo…there’s no
Force…there’s no dark side,” Kevin notes at another point. “I’ll
arm the laser guns. May the Force be with You!" .
On
and on it goes, but Star Wars isn’t really the right production to name-check in this particular context. All
the talk of the George Lucas movie feels a little off. Why? Well, Star Wars isn’t really
about training to be an astronaut, or learning to drive a spaceship. It isn’t,
even, really, about a team of diverse people learning to work together.
Indeed,
one great thing about Star Wars was it took all those concepts
for granted, and went off, lasers blazing, to tell a story in a “lived in”
universe. That story had mythic underpinnings, and fairy tale qualities. It was a space fantasy, where there was no talk of how the hyper-drive, tractor beams or light sabers actually worked.
SpaceCamp seems to owe much more to the
concept of Star Trek; to the idea of becoming the best that you can be so
you can conquer space; to the idea that by working side-by-side with someone of
different qualities, you can grow to become more than the sum of your parts.
But,
belying the film’s superficial writing, SpaceCamp loads up on the Star
Wars call-outs, and they never quite feel right.
I
know a lot of people boast nostalgia for SpaceCamp, and I understand and
respect that. I remember watching the film on VHS in the mid-1980s, and being
absolutely in love with Lea Thompson, and enjoying the (then) state-of-the-art
special effects in the movie.
I am also in love with any movie that involves the space shuttle. I love that ship, and I love the films -- like Moonraker (1979), Hangar 18 (1980), and Lifeforce (1985) -- that feature it prominently.
On
a re-watch, I found SpaceCamp occasionally diverting, but pretty inconsequential. At one point, Kevin notes, cynically, that
astronaut training isn’t valuable because “we’re all going to get nuked anyway.”
SpaceCamp
might have
felt more real, and more uplifting, actually, if it had made a bigger deal of
such Cold War frissons, and the way that the conquest of space can bring all
the people of Earth together as one.
Utterly horrid film.
ReplyDeleteI am a fan of any movie that involves the space shuttle too. If the film had a better script, it would have been better received even after the Challenger January 1986.
ReplyDeleteThe premise of accidental NASA launch was also used in both JOSIE & THE PUSSYCATS IN OUTER SPACE and FAR OUT SPACE NUTS.
SGB
Two things got me through SpaceCamp. One, Kate Capshaw. I was crushing on her after "The Temple of Doom" and her presence helps make this watchable. And the absolutely magnificent score by John Williams. The movie that John Williams scored, now THAT is the movie I want to see. His music sounds like it could be for some lost sequel to E.T or Close Encounters.
ReplyDeleteGotta agree with you. Light fluffy and entertaining, but not much more than that. John Williams brings a lot of majesty to the score and it helps the movie, but when you get right down to it, the movie just doesn't hold up too well. It was one of my wife's favorites when she was young and a revisit a few years ago turned out to be disappointing for her. Rewatching "Goonies" was more fun.
ReplyDelete