In
this week’s episode of Dr. Shrinker (1976), “The Other
Brad,” our titular mad scientist (Jay Robinson) and his minion Hugo (Billy
Barty) attempt to capture the Shrinkies -- three shrunken young adults -- using
a perfect robot replica of Brad (Ted Eccles).
When
the real Brad is captured and taken to a cage in the laboratory, his mechanical
replacement attempts to trick B.J. (Susa Lawrence) and Gordy (Jeff Mackay) into
a trap.
But
Brad is able to escape from captivity and warn his friends about the danger
they face…
The
Sid and Marty Krofft Saturday morning series Dr. Shrinker is always a
lot of fun, and as a kid growing up in the 1970s, I loved it.
But
as an adult, it’s funny to see how the series doesn’t really hold up to the
scrutiny of logic.
Consider
the following: Dr. Shrinker (Robinson) hopes to make a fortune by demonstrating
that his shrinking machine works. He
must therefore re-capture the Shrinkies to prove this fact, though why he doesn’t
just shrink Hugo, or Boris the chimp (seen last episode), is a question worth
asking.
Yet
okay, I’ll accept the premise. The
Shrinkies are proof-positive that the shrink ray works, and Dr. Shrinker is
located on a remote island, so he doesn’t have a lot of choices.
So
this week, in “The Other Brad,” Dr. Shrinker invents a perfect robot duplicate
of a human being to help him capture the Shrinkies.
But...if Doctor Shrinker can build a perfect robot that replicates a human being so
well that even that human’s best friends don’t recognize the difference off the
bat…why is he bothering with a shrink ray?
Forget
asking the highest bidder to pay for the bloomin’ shrink ray. Sell them the perfect
robot technology instead. It may have more practical applications, anyway,
especially in Dr. Shrinker’s villainous circles.
But
of course, Dr. Shrinker doesn’t think of that…
In
a way, this kind of logic-less plot is what really differentiates a show like Dr.
Shrinker from something like Land of the Lost (1974 -1977),
another Sid and Mart Krofft program. There, David Gerrold, a real
science-fiction author, story-edited the series and brought in great genre
writers to pen individual stories. He
paid attention, and made certain that stories like “The Other Brad” didn’t get
through the creative process, at least not without some heavy rewriting. He made sure that the universe of Altrusia
had a consistent set of rules, and that they weren’t violated.
Dr.
Shrinker is a
fun show with a kind of one note premise, but clearly nobody was making certain
that all the stories followed logically from point A to point Z. “The Other Brad” is exhibit A. If you think about the story for even a
minute or two, you realize it’s absolutely ridiculous.
I
can’t remember what I thought at age six when I likely saw this episode. But I do
know my son, at age 8, would crack down on this kind of faulty plotting in a
heart-beat.
That final paragraph is certainly telling isn't it?
ReplyDeleteIt does speak to our changing culture and how much the world has changed.
I mean I know we weren't stupid but were we just blissfully innocent and ignorant?
Are kids smarter or less innocent?
Oh gotta go... I'm being summoned to help bring in groceries. See you pal
Hi SFF: Good question posed my friend. I think they are smarter, but just as innocent. :)
DeleteAgree. I think children are still innocent, just smarter because they are exposed to technology at a young age that we were not. Our generation of the '70s was probably smarter than the '50s children. More knowledge at a young age equals smarter kids. Ark II and Land of the Lost treated the children viewers correctly...intelligent.
DeleteJohn does your son like ARK II?
SGB