A
regular reader writes:
“We all know of TV series whose life was cut too short by low
ratings. The Internet is littered with fan campaigns to bring back shows, some
successful and some not.
But what about the opposite? Any shows you felt actually went
on too long? Shows that dragged out a quest past the point of tedium? Or shows
that wrote themselves into corners?”
I love this question! It’s a good one, and a nice inversion of the
idea of TV programming that gets cut down in its prime.
My answer probably won’t be popular, but I feel
that the first several Berman Era Star Trek shows -- The Next
Generation (1987 – 1994), Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993 –
1999) and Star Trek Voyager (1995 – 2001) -- all peaked in their sixth
seasons, and the seventh (and final) seasons tended to be big disappointments,
featuring many episodes that just didn’t succeed artistically.
I am a big Star Trek fan, obviously, and feel
especially fond towards Deep Space Nine, but I can’t say
that I ever fully got on board with the notion of Captain Sisko’s mother Sarah
having been possessed by the Wormhole aliens/prophets, thus transforming the
good Captain into a quasi-alien character with mystical qualities. The final episodes of the series -- with
wraiths and other “magical” forces battling it out felt -- like a betrayal to
me of Star Trek’s scientific, secular grounding.
But in particular I feel that this plot development
with Sisko was poorly conceived and took away from the “human” adventure. I similarly disliked the idea (presented
earlier than the seventh season if memory serves…), of Dr. Bashir being a
genius genetic augment
For some reason, the people behind these Trek
series felt it necessary to have every character boast some “special” power or
capability by the end of the run. They
couldn’t just be human heroes, like Kirk, McCoy, or Scotty. I felt that the Sarah Sisko plot just
stretched the idea way beyond believability.
The last season of Star Trek: The Next Generation,
featured some really dreadful episodes (“Phantasms,” “Dark Page,” “Homeward,” “Sub
Rosa,” “Eye of the Beholder” and “Emergence”), but none worse than “Force of
Nature,” which rewrote the rules of Star Trek to suggest that warp
speed travel was an environmental hazard to space/time.
You would think that the Traveler’s people -- who zipped about at speed far greater than the Enterprise ever did -- would have been aware of this fact. This idea is probably one of the worst conceits in Star Trek history, and follow-up episodes had to laboriously explain why the Enterprise was breaking the restriction on warp speed limits. Yech.
You would think that the Traveler’s people -- who zipped about at speed far greater than the Enterprise ever did -- would have been aware of this fact. This idea is probably one of the worst conceits in Star Trek history, and follow-up episodes had to laboriously explain why the Enterprise was breaking the restriction on warp speed limits. Yech.
Star Trek: Voyager
ended on a sour note for me with the unexpected, unnatural development of a
Chakotay/Seven of Nine romance. These
two characters and performers shared no chemistry, and no history of romance,
and the whole plot was as contrived as the Sarah Sisko revelation on Deep
Space Nine. The first several
seasons had established the groundwork for a Janeway/Chakotay rapport and
connection, and by the seventh season the idea was just dropped. Also, the episode that brought Kes back into
the fold is one of the worst stories I’ve ever seen on network television.
So, in my opinion all three programs hung around
too long, especially since the sixth season was so strong in the case of Next
Gen and DS9.
So far as programs writing themselves into a
corner, I’m afraid I’m going to harp on the two genre programs I have commented
negatively upon lately, the remade Battlestar Galactica and Lost.
I would again like to plead my case that I don’t
hate these programs or feel that they were worthless, only that in the end they
both squandered a great deal of audience love and good faith by having no real
plan for their closing seasons or installments.
Both shows had to go endure creative contortions
to justify their ending episodes, and even with those contortions, the finales
failed to impress.
So many mysteries on Lost were never adequately explained. The Others, who originally
could seemingly rip people out of existence, changed into just another tribe on
the island, for example. The series introduced --
and then just as quickly dropped -- the Tail-ies
and new characters such as Mr. Eko, Nikki and Paolo. The overall impression was of a series
lurching from one idea to the other with no coherent plan at all.
Battlestar Galactica
similarly had to survive creative contortions to justify Mrs. Tigh as a secret
Cylon, and the whole final subplot with Starbuck as some kind of weird angel-thing
just never worked at all.
Lost peaked after one season
in my opinion, and BSG after two.
It’s ironic, but after the finales of both
programs, fan interest dropped off precipitously because the final chapters
didn’t live up to expectations. Had Lost
or BSG
been canceled earlier, they would be championed and talked about constantly today as great sci-fi series
that died before their time.
Instead, they serve as powerful reminders to current genre
programs of a serialized nature that all the artistic and creative “good”
leading up to the last chapter may be, in the end, worthless, if the final “pages”
of the story disappoint.
John, I absolutely agree with your thoughts regarding Berman's Next Generation, DS9 and Voyager. I also agree that both Lost and Moore's BSG lost their way and the final episodes were great disappointment to the viewer. Those extra seasons were not worthy of being made. How I wish that, e.g., Space:1999 had more than two seasons because it was worthy of it.
ReplyDeleteSGB
Thankfully, "Fringe" seemed to buck this trend, and I found the ending incredibly satisfying and true to the characters as they had been developed over the 5 seasons, and it avoided the trap that shows like "Lost" fell into by not presenting over-arching mysteries that went unsolved; they provided answers to them as they went along, but never at the expense of the characters or the heart of the show. They wisely remembered that "Fringe" was a story about family and a father and son story, not simply about the mysteries or monsters of the week.
ReplyDeleteThe third season of Land Of The Lost should never have happened. Nor any but the first season of Lost In Space.
ReplyDelete