A
teenage babysitter and high school student, Gail Osborne (Kathleen Beller) is
stalked by an unknown assailant as she begins to date Steve (Scott Columby),
and they go on double dates with her best friend Allison (Robin Mattson) and
jock, Phil Lawver (Dennis Quaid).
Before long, Gail
finds threatening notes in her school locker, and receives strange, threatening
phone calls at home, at odd hours.
The
stalking grows worse, even after Gail reports the events to the high school
principal, and one night she is assaulted and raped in her house.
After
recovering, Gail sets out to use her passion -- photography -- to trap the
assailant and prevent him from committing rape a second time.
Are
You in the House Alone?
first aired on American television, in prime time, on September 20, 1978, and
is notable, in part, because it adopts many of the same tactics employed by
more well-known, theatrical slasher films, Halloween (1978) and When
A Stranger Calls (1979).
Specifically,
Are
You in the House Alone? adopts the subjective perspective, or the “stalk”
P.O.V. shot that has long been associated with the slasher sub-genre, and
efforts such as Friday the 13th (1980), or Carpenter’s seminal film.
These first person subjective shots are remarkably effective in building
tension and anticipation in the film, and Are You in the House Alone? veritably
comes to life whenever this visual conceit is utilized by director Walter
Grauman. At another juncture, the camera, while in third-person mode, goes hand-held, and in the process creates a kind of immediacy or urgency. This moment occurs at the moment of greatest suspense, as Gail runs to lock the doors and bolt the windows, before a killer can enter the house.
Also -- and significantly -- the landline telephone is a key vehicle for terror here, as
it is in Carpenter’s TV-movie Someone’s Watching Me (1978), Black
Christmas (1974), and also the aforementioned When a Stranger Calls.
In fact, Halloween also uses the telephone to
horrific effect, though in a different way: Michael Myers uses it as a weapon for
strangulation, and at one point, Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) thinks a
caller is taunting her, when it is really just her friend, Annie, on the other
end of the line.
Given
that the telephone proved so important to slasher films and telefilms of the
mid-to-late 1970s, it’s probably fair to state that all these efforts were
playing on -- or tapping into -- a key societal fear; that a vehicle for communication was actually a vehicle for horror, or evil to enter
the family house.
A stalker can’t easily get inside a suburban house
through a locked door or window, but the telephone is a portal, at least of
sorts, for terrorizing prey. It is a form of entering the home in an oblique kind of way.
Forecasting
both Scream
(1996) and I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997), the killer in this
made-for-TV film utilizes both hand-written notes (which say things like “I am watching you!”) and the
telephone to destabilize his prey. The overall effect is that the psychological assault seems to come from
all directions.
What
may prove most shocking about Are You in the House Alone? is that the predator
or stalker “gets” the final girl, a victory telegraphed in the film’s first
scene. The rest of the movie plays as flashback of the stalking events, until
Gail sets out to go after the boy who raped her. Usually in films of this type, final girls manage to survive the
attack, and kill their enemies. Here, Gail has to go back to the school with
the sociopath (Dennis Quaid), and determine a way to prevent him from
committing rape again.
She
does so -- and in a plot conceit that
mirrors Brian De Palma’s Dressed to Kill (1980) -- uses a
modern technology to do so, in this case, the camera.
So, intriguingly, Are You
in The House Alone? sees technology as a two-edged sword. It can be
used to terrorize (the telephone), or mete justice (the camera).
Another strange connection to
horror films of the 1970s which merits a mention: Both I Spit on Your Grave (1978) and this TV-movie
concern rape, it’s true, but more notably, both productions view “art” as the channel which can
help one overcome a violation of this horrible type.
In I Spit on Your Grave, the rape
victim, Jennifer, tapes back together the ripped pages of her manuscript. Jennifer is beaten, bruised and hurt in that film, and the arduous
process of picking herself up and putting herself back together begins with
something apparently small: the stitching together (with that scotch tape) of a
single page.
Part of Jennifer’s difficult re-creation of self involves
her returning to and nurturing the personal vision of herself as a writer and artist. The rapists can rip apart her work, but
she is still, finally, a creator…something which they will never be. They
can’t take her sense of artistic expression away from her. It
is part of Jennifer, and it is in that place of “self” that Jennifer first
re-asserts her identity.
In Are You in the House Alone? Gail
recovers from the rape, and resumes her dedication to photography, r-epurposing
that passion and artistry towards the saving the life of another young woman,
so they will not endure what she has endured. Once more identity is re-asserted by returning to the pursuit of art.
Some horror fans have suggested that Are
You in the House Alone? is actually less a horror film than an Afterschool
Special, considering that it involves some tiresome soap opera aspects. In particular,
there is a (boring) subplot here about Gail’s parents and their travails. Her father has lost his
job, and her mother (Blythe Danner) is harried, attempting to work a real
estate job over her husband’s objections.
These moments feel off point, and yet Are
You in the House Alone? features so many qualities of the slasher film
of the 1970s and 1980s, as I’ve noted above, including the red herring, the
character who appears to be the stalker, at various points.
Here there are at
least two red herrings to conisder. The first is Gail’s ex-boyfriend, who grew angry when
she wouldn’t sleep with him. And the
second is her high school photography teacher, Chris Eldon (Alan Fudge) who instructs his
student to take photos of herself that make her look “sexy.” He would get fired for that comment, in 2016. Later, the teacher shows up in his car while Gail is walking home
from a babysitting gig, and offers her a ride.
There is definitely something menacing and creepy and wrong about his presence. But he isn't the stalker, either.
Both of these characters throw the audience off the trail of the
real stalker: Phil, a jock/jerk from a rich family. Phil, played by Quaid, suffers from the very modern
condition known as “affluenza.” He is
rich, and feels he is entitled to do anything he wants. “I don’t have to account to anyone for anything I do,” he insists,
and the movie proves his point. Rather
than facing prison, Phil (apparently) simply transfers to a private school in New
Hampshire. There, presumably, his
activities will begin anew.
So where most slasher films use their final act and denouement to
suggest that the killer may strike again, or even be supernatural in origin/power,
this TV movie suggests that the society is the true monster, and that final girls
like Gail will have to fight this “monster” again and again, because the system
itself favors monsters, rather than the victims of crimes.
That's a scary note to go out on, and even with its soap opera plotting, there are moments of pure terror in Are You in the House Alone?.
No comments:
Post a Comment