Monday, July 01, 2013

The Lone Ranger Week: "Enter The Lone Ranger" (September 15, 1949)


In the Southwest Territory of the Old West, a team of six Texas Rangers are betrayed by their guide, Collins (George Lewis), and led into a deadly ambush at the bottom of a canyon.  The Cavendish gang led by Butch Cavendish (Glenn Strange) is waiting for them, and kills all the brave men, save for one lucky survivor.

That lucky survivor manages to survive in the hot desert sun for a time, until rescued by an Indian scout, Tonto (Jay Silverheels).  Tonto remembers the wounded man from his youth, when the ranger saved his life, and decides to return the favor.

Once nursed back to health, the survivor of the canyon massacre puts on a black eye-mask and adopts the name “The Lone Ranger” (Clayton Moore).  He swears that “for every one of those men” (the rangers in their graves…) he is going to “bring a hundred law-breakers to justice.” 

When Tonto asks the Lone Ranger if he intends to commit murder to further his cause, the hero explain:.  “I’m not going to do any killing…If a man must die, it’s up to the law to decide that,” he says.

Following those honorable words, the Lone Ranger and Tonto team up to track down Collins, in hopes that the treacherous scout could lead them to the departed Butch Cavendish.  But Collins is armed and dangerous, and eager to take out the canyon massacre survivors…

The Lone Ranger (Clayton Moore) is born.

After watching “Enter the Lone Ranger,” the first episode of the TV series, I realized again how much that modern superhero lore owes to this character, and this beloved and popular TV incarnation of the character. 

In brief, this is the story of a man left for dead, who takes a personal tragedy (the death of his brother…Captain Reid) and transforms it into a galvanizing force for good in his life and the lives of others.

The Lone Ranger swears not revenge, but to bring law to a realm of lawlessness.  He acts not out of rage or anger, but out of the steadfast belief that he was lucky to be spared, and now must make a positive difference in the world.

As you may be able to detect, there are strong echoes of Batman here, obviously, but also of other modern superheroes who are “born” in tragedy and darkness and despair.

The great thing about The Lone Ranger -- much like Superman -- is that he doesn’t use the fact that something terrible and unfair happened to him to immediately abandon his values and beliefs.  Instead, the tragedy actually strengthens those moral beliefs, as we see here.  The Lone Ranger -- even though he was nearly killed -- refuses to kill in kind.

Thus the Lone Ranger understands that the response to rampant lawlessness can’t simply be…more lawlessness.  It’s a notion that, in many ways, our country is still learning in this post-War on Terror Age.



I also appreciate this episode’s stance on heroism.  The Lone Ranger begins as an entirely anonymous figure.  “Enter the Lone Ranger” commences with that team of six Rangers heading to the canyon (to face tragedy) and we don’t meet the Lone Ranger, or even see his face.  

Not even once.

Instead, he is just one of the team, an anonymous law man doing his job.  After he survives the battle, and is left wounded, we still don’t see his face.  His visage is obscured by a bandanna, and by careful camera-placement on the part of the director.  Only when he puts on the mask -- and thereby accepts his destiny -- does The Lone Ranger take center stage in the drama. 

The explicit message seems to be not that men are born heroes, but that events and experience lead them to that juncture of heroism.  Certainly that is the case for this man.

In terms of style, “Enter the Lone Ranger” is a fast-paced, action-packed series indeed, and this episode displays those qualities fully.  There are lots of on-screen wipes deployed as transitions, a technique also used in Star Wars (1977) to suggest speed, velocity, and accelerating excitement.  One thing is for certain: this episode moves fast, and is filled with shoot-outs and other intense action (and violence).  “Enter the Lone Ranger” holds up remarkably well today, and proves incredibly entertaining.  

I’ve said before that I use my wife, Kathryn, as a kind of barometer from time-to-time, to see whether entertainments are working as I believe they are.  She was quite surprised to find herself thoroughly engaged by the three episodes she watched with me. It's hard to believe that these episode are over sixty years old, at this point.

A film style that has not aged quite as gracefully as the visual flourish of the wipe is the overuse of voice-over narration.  Throughout this episode (and ensuing episodes), a baritone-voiced narrator explains the action as it occurs on-screen, even though the well-mounted visuals make the story abundantly clear.

A lone figure moves painfully…he alone of the six Texas Rangers lives…” the narrator notes, for instance.  One could make the argument that such narration distances one from the action, or, contrarily, perhaps, that the narration makes the adventure into something longer-lasting than a TV show episode: a legend re-told and repeated.  I’m on the fence about the technique, I suppose.  It could be used less frequently.

Tonto (Jay Silverheels)

The scoundrel, Butch Cavendish (Glenn Strange).
The first several episodes of The Lone Ranger tell an entire tale, in toto, and “Enter the Lone Ranger” is only the first piece of it.  This segment establishes the diabolical trap which kills the Rangers and gives birth, after a fashion, to the character of The Lone Ranger.  The episode also introduces Tonto and his name for the Ranger, “kemosabe,” meaning “trusted scout” or, alternatively, “faithful friend.”

The next episode, “The Lone Ranger Fights On,” adds additional elements of the legend, and we’ll get to that episode soon…

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous8:48 AM

    The voiceovers do seem redundant today, but I suspect they may be a legacy of the era when The Lone Ranger was on radio and such action had to be explained to the listener. Old habits die hard.

    ~~ Meredith

    ReplyDelete

60 Years Ago: Goldfinger (1964) and the Perfect Bond Movie Model

Unlike many film critics, I do not count  Goldfinger  (1964) as the absolute “best” James Bond film of all-time. You can check out my rankin...