Every
teenager believes that the world revolves around him or her, and if you
consider it, there’s some truth in this belief.
After
all, as human beings, we see and understand the world through the prism of our own eyes, and when we die, the world
we have created, seen, and experienced also dies with us. The end of the world is, literally, an individual death.
Given
this fact, the world ends for millions of people every single day. Every moment, every instant, another
apocalypse occurs, and a whole universe dies out, going down in flames of
annihilation.
The
2001 cult film Donnie Darko remembers this basic human truth regarding
teenagers and makes it hauntingly literal.
The
film’s ambivalent hero, Donnie (Jake Gyllenhaall) reckons with the impending
end of the world in twenty-eight days due to the unexpected creation of a
dangerous “Tangent Universe.” It’s a catastrophic ending of the cosmos
itself that only Donnie can prevent because he’s at the center of the paradox
that created that universe in the first place.
He can escape his teenage “tunnel vision” and save the world, or he can
die -- along with everyone else -- a
prisoner of anger and fear.
Donnie
Darko also
concerns the universal loneliness of
adolescence, and Donnie’s fear that, in death, that loneliness will persist
and linger for eternity. He doesn’t want to be alone, and at the same
time he doesn’t fully understand how to connect with others.
The
universe itself, or in the film’s lingo, “God’s Channel,” must help Donnie
understand the paradox if it is to continue to exist at all. The Richard Kelly film thus takes an
anti-social kid on a strange journey of self-discovery and, in the end,
transforms him into a superhero of sorts (as witnessed by his alliterative
name…); one who eventually embraces life and connection…right before it all ends,
at least for him.
In
seeing his world end, however, Donnie experiences an epiphany. He comes to finally recognize that “destruction is a form of creation,” to
quote the film. His ending -- his death
-- creates a new beginning for his family, his girlfriend, and the whole of the
human race. He laughs madly immediately
preceding his death, because only at the end does he recognize God’s plan for
him.
Byzantine,
mysterious, and hypnotic, Donnie Darko is a masterpiece in so
many ways. It is unnervingly creepy, especially in the seemingly sinister presence
of Doomsday’s Herald, a giant robot bunny-thing called Frank.
The
film is also unfailingly funny in its observations about human life especially
in the countenancing of the fact that many people, like Jim Cunningham (Patrick
Swayze) thrive not by understanding life in all its glorious complexity, but by
reducing it to easy-to-digest platitudes, like a lifeline with “fear” on one end
of the spectrum and “love” on the other.
All shades of gray apparently fall on distinct points between.
But
I submit that Donnie Darko deserves serious consideration as a great work of
art because the film dwells in that expressive world of the Tangent Universe, a
world where the “manipulated living”
and the “manipulated dead” -- and
even the foundations of reality itself -- conspire to lead Donnie towards his
heroic apotheosis. This universe of
influences and messages is presented in the film through representative symbols
that viewers must translate and interpret.
This task fosters engagement in the story, and sympathy for Donnie.
These
visual representations, from movie marquees to allusions to great literature, conform
to my highest aesthetic criteria in terms of film criticism. Their presence means that the form’s visual
content reflects its narrative content, and augments that content, enhancing
meaning.
Donnie
Darko is
about what it means to grow up and to leave childish things behind, in the
truest sense of that phrase. And primary
among those childish things is the tunnel
vision of ego, the desire to always put one’s self first. Overcoming this tunnel-vision is not easy, as
I noted above, because we all see the world through our own individual
prism.
Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit?
In October of 1988 as the Presidential race between George
Bush and Michael Dukakis nears its end, a troubled Virginia teenager, Donnie
Darko (Gyllenhaal) narrowly escapes a strange death when a jet engine falls
from the sky and destroys his bedroom.
Fortunately, Donnie was sleep-walking at the time of the accident, and
survives unscathed.
The jet engine, however, is a mystery. It seems to have no
origin, and has actually created a time paradox, a new “Tangent Universe” that
if not repaired, will consume the prime universe in twenty-eight days. Only Donnie’s death -- which should have
occurred to begin with -- will set the universe right, a fact he increasingly
becomes aware of, in part through a strange book written by a neighbor, “Grandma
Death,” called The Philosophy of Time Travel.
In the twenty-eight days until the end of the world, Donnie
encounters a self-help guru and charlatan, Jim Cunningham (Swayze), learns from
a pair of kindly teachers (Drew Barrymore, Noah Wyle), and falls in love with a
beautiful girl who has just relocated to Virginia, named Gretchen (Jena
Malone). He is also visited periodically
by a creepy cyborg bunny man, Frank (James Duval), who seems to have knowledge
of the future, and Donnie’s fate.
Working with a psychologist, Donnie must determine who is he,
and what kind of future he wants for the world.
Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
At
one point in Donnie Darko, Donnie and his teacher (Wyle) debate the basics
of fate, free will and God’s plan.
Donnie has rejected religion and God because of his fear that “every living creature on Earth dies alone.” Given this fact, he says the search for God
is nothing less than “absurd.”
However,
Donnie also makes the observation that man may possess free will to a degree within“God’s Channel,” and the movie
implies that God’s channel actually involves this tangent, apparently
accidental universe.
In
other words, Donnie is bestowed a grace period of 28 days to fall in love,
reconcile his “emotional problems” with his family, and overcome his fear of isolation
and death. He was meant by design and
predestination to die when the jet engine crashed in his room. That death still occurs, only later. But Donnie is able to finally, in the end,
face it with a sense of grace and purpose because of this interval and what he
learns during it.. God (or the universe,
perhaps), grants Donnie a chance to settle the outstanding issues of his life
before he leaves the mortal coil.
The
forces of nature (or God) surrounding Donnie -- which desire to continue existing -- thus spend 28 days sending
Donnie the signals and messages he needs to accept and embrace his fate.
Grandma
Death’s time travel book calls this messaging “the “ensurance [sic] trap,” but it isn’t exactly a trap. The manipulated living and the manipulated
dead want to survive, and want Donnie to sacrifice himself so that the universe
continues to exist, but it isn’t a malevolent or diabolical kind of trap.
Instead,
in Donnie’s case, the messages must reverse and heal his paranoid
schizophrenia, his “increased detachment”
from the world, and replace it with a psyche that sees and recognizes the
beauty in human life and connection, and is willing to sacrifice itself for the
species, indeed for all creation, everywhere.
Donnie’s
journey is expressed through a number of symbols throughout the film. These symbols represent messages.
In
one of these, Frank writes and presents a poem to his English class in which he
envisions himself as the savior of children everywhere during an approaching
storm. In one sense, this is an allusion
to Catcher
in the Rye, Salinger’s 1951 novel in which another teen protagonist,
Holden Caulfield, imagined himself a savior of innocence. In a much more literal sense, the poem
represents Donnie’s subconscious understanding of his role in preserving life
on Earth.
The
film also deliberately positions Donnie, intriguingly, as a Christ figure. A theater marquee pictured on-screen at one
point shows a unique double bill: The Evil Dead (1983) and The
Last Temptation of Christ (1988).
Those
films seem very different, indeed, yet they represent the totality of Donnie’s
journey. That odyssey begins with all
kinds of fear. There is fear of the
returning dead -- embodied by the herald,
Frank -- and fear of death. But the journey ascends to an apex in which
Donnie willingly lays down his life for all of mankind, even though it is
sinful life (as clearly embodied by Cunningham, Frank, and others).
Christ’s
temptation by Satan in the Scorsese film involved the Devil showing him the
mortal life and pleasures he would miss by selecting death on the cross. That mortal life included love, lust, and other
earthbound wonders. What remains so interesting
about Donnie Darko is that Donnie, like Christ, actually increases his connection to humanity by
experiencing in a kind of vision all those things he will later miss.
What
I’m saying is that a personal epiphany of vision of love, brotherhood, human connection,
and sex doesn’t force either Christ or Donnie to make the wrong choice. Rather, it emboldens each to see the beauty
in all life, and wish to preserve it
for others. Again, this realization
comes back to the idea that Donnie exists within, not outside, God’s
channel. God gives him twenty-eight days
to see the beauty of life, and therefore the desire to preserve it, even if he
can’t share in its beauty beyond that span.
But
the theater marquee represents a visual book-ending of the journey. Life can be
like The
Evil Dead, where friends and lovers become enemies, and there is only
ugliness and death. Or it can be like The
Last Temptation of Christ, where the beauty of life leads one to make a
sacrifice for others.
Donnie
Darko explicitly
discusses this concept when Barrymore’s English teacher describes the God
Machine, the Deus Ex Machina. This discussion raises our awareness that God
has set this plan for Donnie into motion.
Everything is pre-determined, though as Donnie debates, there is some
room for free-will within that channel of pre-determination.
I
admire films that adopt a standpoint about humanity and our existence, and Donnie
Darko offers a fairly complex, if spiritual reading of it. There is such a thing as free will, states
the filmmaker, but it involves movement only within a tunnel of certain
possibilities. Donnie’s understanding of
this, ironically, comes from Cunningham’s ridiculous self-help life line, which
simplifies the world to two axes, “fear”
and “love.” Donnie responds angrily to the life-line that
“life isn’t that simple,” and yet in
a way…it is. Donnie explicitly moves
from fear to love in the 28 days of the Tangent Universe, but the important
thing is that he does so under the auspices of his own intellect. He learns how
to maneuver, individually, through that “channel.”
Some
might assert that’s the key to leading a good life.
Donnie
Darko also
seems absolutely obsessed with the Bush/Dukakis electoral battle of 1988. We see the two candidates debate on
television screens, and there is also mention of Dukakis on the radio. Donnie’s sister, Elizabeth (Maggie
Gyllenhaal) declares that she is voting for Dukakis, over her parents’
objections, at the family dinner table, and the legend “vote Dukakis” appears on the Darko refrigerator in the Tangent
Universe. These moments amount to more
than establishing the film’s time period or setting (October 1988). All the allusions to the presidential election
seem more important than that.
An
election, in essence, is a choice between possible futures, between possible universes. When an election ends, one of those universes
-- a tangent universe? -- collapses while the other universe
continues, unabated. If Donnie
Darko doesn’t comment overtly on the specific candidates and their
attributes, it certainly comments on the nature of choice and free will.
For
every affirmative choice we make, a whole universe is destroyed. When we pick Bush, the Dukakis universe dies.
Again, this goes back to the film’s
paradigm that even in destruction, there is creation.
In
the film, Donnie’s parents ask Elizabeth something along the lines of: “do you really think that Dukakis can keep this
country safe?” It’s a question that
might very well be asked of Donnie at this juncture too. Can a horny, self-obsessed teenage boy save
the world?
The
point is that people will never know
if Dukakis would have been a good president and kept the country safe, just as,
following the fall of the Tangent Universe, nobody knows of Donnie’s sacrifice
for humanity.
Again,
I’m not suggesting a pro-Dukakis slant on the part of the filmmakers, only the
idea that universes are born and die every day, and we never know where the
path not taken might lead. The doorway to
tangent universes closes, and moves outside God’s (narrow?) channel of options.
I
wrote recently, in regards to the comic-book To Hell You Ride, about the idea of messages and messengers.
They arrive in our reality, it seems, and we either decide to note them and
heed them, or we choose not to. Given
all I’ve described above, Donnie Darko is a film filled with
messages, often conveyed in writing and broadcast notably within the confines
of the frame.
These
messages include “Vote Dukakis,”
which I interpret as a message about saving the universe that people don’t see, and having faith that even
untested, disliked people will do the right thing (like Donnie does the right
thing when given the chance).
The
messages include the theater marquee, advertising “Evil Dead,” and “Last
Temptation of Christ,” a duality which explains Donnie’s journey from
psychological torture and fear to self-sacrifice and redemption.
Another
message is “cellar door,” a legend
which appears on the blackboard in Donnie’s English class, and paves the way
for Donnie to understand how to proceed at a critical juncture.
Jim
Cunningham’s life-line, showing the “fear”/ “love” continuum is another on-screen message, literally spelled-out. The recognition of "Poetry Day," when Donnie reads his story about saving children from the story might be considered another. There's even the signage "His Name is Frank" which validates Donnie's belief in his phantasm of the Bunny.
All
these words -- these messages --
appear on screen in the film, and we are asked to consider them and interpret
their meanings, at the same time Donnie must do the same. The film thus allows us to learn with Donnie
at the same time he learns, and therefore to sympathize with his journey.
At
the end of the film, Donnie must decide if a world that creates weird kiddie entertainment
like Sparkle Motion should continue to exist.
Or if a world that allows men like sexual predator Jim Cunningham to become
successful and admired should be allowed to continue.
Or if a world that bans quality books in favor of self-help pabulum deserves a second chance.
Or if a world that bans quality books in favor of self-help pabulum deserves a second chance.
The answer, of course, is that despite all the
confusion and ugliness, this is the same (mad…) world that offers
unconventional beauty, as we see in Cherita’s talent show dance.
It’s
the same world that allows Donnie to connect with the wounded Gretchen.
It’s
the same world that can make a superhero -- or
savior -- out of a confused teenager who likes to masturbate a lot.
In
it all, there is a plan…and beauty too,
Donnie’s
journey – and the film’s view of life, is best expressed in the lyrics to the
song, “Mad World,” which accompany the film’s final, elegiac montage. The lyrics assert: “And I find it kind of funny, I find it kind of sad, that the dream in
which I’m dying are the best I’ve ever had…”
Donnie’s
last twenty eight days -- a waking dream
from which he finally does not awake – represent the best part of his life;
the span in which he stopped being an “anger
prisoner” and instead began to see life in all its multi-faceted
complexity, a complexity that involved both ugliness and beauty.
We
sometimes miss just how beautiful life really is. We “run
in circles” instead of paying attention to the things that matter. Donnie Darko is like a teacher
explaining this “lesson.” The film is thus one part English Lit, one
part spooky horror film, one part Quantum Physics, and one part spiritual passion play.
Personally
speaking, all those qualities make Donnie Darko one of my all-time
favorite films.
What is your opinion of the "Director's Cut" of the film? I found that it removed much of the necessary ambiguity and made for a lesser viewing experience, especially the reinserted scenes narrating the concepts in the The Philosophy of Time Travel and also the more explicit explanation of the creation of the tangent universe. It's one of the few times in which I feel that the Director's Cut was inferior to the theatrical release.
ReplyDeleteHi Tonyt2000,
DeleteI agree with you 100%. The original film is far superior than the director's cut, and maintains a deeper sense of ambiguity about what precisely is happening. I recommend folks seek out the original cut, if they can.
Best,
John
Thank you for this interesting analysis. Always a pleasure to read.
ReplyDelete- T.S.
I saw this movie earler this year for the first time and found it mesmerizing, haunting, and impossible to stop thinking about. I did not watch the director's cut, but I did read some of the "official" websites, particularly the one about the fictional time travel book. And I found I liked the ambiguity of the film far better than the more concrete definitions I read. The ambiguity allowed me to continually rethink the messages and reinterpret them.
ReplyDeleteAnd as a side note, that version of "Mad World" became an all-time favorite for me. Just as haunting as the movie, and the hidden sides if the characters shown during that musical montage were quite enlightening.
Great review as always, John!
Terri Wilson
Another superb piece of analysis, John! I have always liked Donnie Darko and, of course, you are such an expert at explaining its prevailing themes.
ReplyDeleteI was listening to Scottish broadcaster Ricky Ross discussing The Master with a guest on the radio last weekend. During their review a comment was made on how often it is the less overtly spiritual films that offer—however obliquely—some of the more potent lessons on how to live life when compared to those that hold up their religion as a signpost but often have less substance. I consider Donnie Darko a prime example of the former.
I am also a big fan of the theme of alternate universes directed by the "big" decisions we make in life, either as a society or as an individual. It can become paralysing if you dwell on their implications too deeply, of course, but it's a sage warning against drifting through life without ever being aware of the inherent power we all possess in our sense of personal agency.