Wednesday, September 22, 2010

CULT TV FLASHBACK # 120: Mission: Impossible: "The Mind of Stefan Miklos" (1969)

A suspenseful game of Cold War chess, "The Mind of Stefan Miklos" gets my vote for the all-time best episode of Bruce Geller's Mission: Impossible (1966-1973). 

This third season installment -- originally aired in mid-January of 1969 -- commences with a close-up shot of Jim Phelps (Peter Graves) unlocking a small padlock to gain entrance to a secret location and receive his taped orders. 

The remainder of the episode involves how Jim unlocks the mind of his opposite number in a foreign intelligence unit: one wily and devilish mastermind named Stefan Miklos (Steve Ihnat). 

Specifically, Phelps must establish for the brilliant Miklos that a man named Townsend (Jason Evers) is still working for Miklos' government and is not, in fact, a double agent for the Americans, as has been suggested by another foreign agent, the conniving Simpson (Ed Asner). 

The Switch.
Why the con? 

Because Townsend possesses top-secret but  false information that the U.S. government wants Miklos' government to believe and act upon.  

Therefore, Miklos must believe  that Townsend is still trustworthy, along with his information. 

Yet in order to believe this carefully constructed-lie, Miklos must "discover" what he deems the truth  himself.  He must see through a carefully-constructed "frame" of Townsend that Phelps has painstakingly created.   His ego must be satisfied that he has arrived at the right conclusions.

Got that? 

Good...because "The Mind of Stefan Miklos" is almost impossible to explain in terms of language, yet perfectly understandable -- perfectly plain -- in the watching.

In large part this is due to director Robert Butler's frequent use of extreme close-ups and insert shots to highlight important narrative clues (an airport locker key, a passport, etc.).  This is one reason I have always admired Mission: Impossible: because the series' creators always understood that television is primarily a visual medium and acted upon that knowledge. 

During the episode's opening briefing with Cinnamon (Barbara Bain), Rollin (Martin Landau), Willy (Peter Lupus) and Barney (Greg Morris), Phelps describes his foe, Miklos,  as "cold, calculating and ruthless," and a man with "no weaknesses, no flaws," thereby setting up the character as a truly worthy adversary; one quite different from the run-of-the-mill villains featured on the series.  Miklos is a man quite expert at mind-games, one not easily led to a conclusion, so Jim must make certain his plan for Miklos is not too obvious...but also not so byzantine that he can't decipher it. 

To employ a cliche, it's a tightrope walk all the way.

The only way to defeat Niklos - a man "invulnerable" except "to himself" --  is for Jim to play on Miklos' own cunning; to manipulate his belief in himself and his abilities.  To accomplish this, Jim and his team lead Miklos through a precise maze of small clues and have him think his way to the "right" (or is it wrong?) conclusion.  

Rollin plays Miklos, with Simpson.
Those clues -- also revealed in true M:I-styled economical, visual  storytelling -- involve small, simple things: a match-book, a painting and a small time discrepancy.

Each clue is surreptitiously offered to Miklos only once, but Phelps gambles on his enemy's photographic memory (shown as almost subliminal flash-cuts or freeze-frames in the body of the episode).

Phelp's only advantage over Miklos in this "sting"-type tale is the fact that one foreign agent (Simpson) has never seen another foreign agent (Miklos). 

Therefore, Rollin impersonates Miklos with Simpson; and then turn around and impersonates Simpson with Miklos. What brass!

Rollin plays Simpson, with Miklos.
This gambit -- with Rollin playing two roles --  permits series regular Martin Landau to craft two really fine, very different performances: one aping the squirrely, suspicious Simpson (Asner) and one mimicking the cool, brilliant Miklos.  

What's even more amazing about these tour-de-force performances is that Landau dances between them, back-to-back, scene-to-scene and -- again -- the viewer always knows precisely "who" Landau is supposed to be. 

It's terrific work, and Landau pulls it off with real joie de vivre.  If you look at the two photos of Rollin featured in this post, you can see that Landau's face actually looks different when he's playing Miklos and Simpson, but no make-up or prosthetics are employed. It's just the way this actor carries himself.

The tension in "The Mind of Stefan Miklos" keeps spiking for two reason, primarily.  The first involves split-second timing.  Barney and Willy must get Rollin's photograph into a hollow statue base, taking out Asner's photo in the process. 

But Miklos is en route from the airport and arrives to pick up the statue (and the secret package inside) early...necessitating Barney speed up his delicate work (which involves cutting through a display shelf with a saw...).   Here the plan nearly falls apart. 

The matchbook of a left-handed man?
The second reason for suspense involves the fact that Jim's entire strategy hinges on the idea that Miklos is that "cool, calculating" mastermind, and not a man subject to whim or the vicissitudes of the moment. 

At one late juncture, Jim realizes how much is riding on his assumption about Miklos' character. 

"He's letting his emotion affect his reason," Jim complains.  "He's never done that before.  Maybe I was too clever. Maybe the matchbook and the painting and the time discrepancy were too subtle for him to pick up!"

Finally, Miklos does fall into Jim's trap.  He sees through the carefully orchestrated frame, and puts together the final three clues (the aforementioned match book, painting and time discrepancy.) He thus concludes that since someone is trying to frame Townsend, his information must be true...and accurate. Jim has led him to his downfall.

And finally, this is why this Mission:Impossible episode is such a classic.  Miklos -- his conclusion reached -- stops to expeirence a moment of empathy for his unseen, unnamed opponent (Phelps). "I wish I could meet the man that masterminded the operation," he says.  "He played the game brilliantly, but he lost.  It'll destroy him."

A watch set back a few minutes...

The irony here is powerful.  Miklos doesn't know it, but he's actually talking about himself. 

He has arrived at the wrong conclusion (that the information belonging to Townsend is correct) and it will, indeed, destroy him.  Miklos played the game well, but Phelps played it better.

Checkmate.

What I adore about this moment, is that just as Miklos notes how "losing" will "destroy" his unseen nemesis, the episode cuts away from Miklos to a close-up of Jim

Yet Jim is not gloating or swaggering at having beaten his  genius opponent.  Instead, he is composed and there's sympathy evident on his face.  He knows what Miklos does not; that Miklos is speaking about himself.

Game over and mission accomplished: Miklos believes the wrong man.

Jim also knows that there but for the grace of God goes he

It could have very easily been Phelps and the Americans who were "tricked" in such an elaborate covert operation.  The roles might have been reversed. 

What the viewer thus detects of Jim Phelps in "The Mind of Stefan Miklos"  is this sense of respect for the opponent and for the game.  But also Phelps' intrinsic humanity.  He executed the checkmate perfectly, but he still feels compassion for the loser. He knows there are consequences for the (brilliant) Miklos.

Moments like this -- told only with a silent expression on a chiseled face or through clever editing selections -- put truth to the oft-told lie that Mission: Impossible was a show just about the job, and never about the people doing the job. 

In "The Mind of Stefan Miklos" the viewer gains a clear sense (again through the careful visuals) of Jim's respect for his enemy, and also the jeopardy that Jim puts himself in every week to defend this country.  The episode thus becomes very much about character. 

For Jim it's not just an impossible mission...it's personal.

4 comments:

  1. As soon you mentioned, "gets my vote for the all-time best episode of Bruce Geller's Mission: Impossible (1966-1973)", my mind immediately flashed to a certain episode (that I felt was the pinnacle, but couldn't remember its title) as my pick for the same. Then, I continued to read what was yours in the post. Hell of a thing! It's the same one! I LOVED this ep. for exactly what you detail here, John. This has a great cast (I always thought Steve Inhat was underrated as an actor), and an intelligent script that maneuvered actors and audience so well. If there ever was an episode of M:I that I would want translated to the big screen, this one was it. Thanks so much for making me re-live it again (now I want to pick up the third season just for this).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Le0pard13:

    I agree with you about the late Steve Ihnat, he was an amazing actor.

    You look at something like M:I and Stefan Miklos, and almost the entire performance was internally-based; a control of emotions.

    Then you look at him as Garth of Izar on Star Trek ("Whom Gods Destroy"), where he plays a big, broad, emotional character...it's great range. Totally different characters; totally different approaches to performance.

    Glad to know you adore this episode of M:I too, my friend. Thanks for the comment!

    best,
    John

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm so glad to hear we both are fans of this fine (and missed) actor, John. You bring up some great examples of his range. I for one will also remember him for his role in THE OUTER LIMITS two-parter, The Inheritors. His character and performance were so moving--and that speech of his at the end really got to me as a kid. Thanks so much for remembering Ihnat, my friend.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Le0pard13: I love that epissode of The Outer Limits, "The Inheritors." I need to watch that one again; thank you for bringing it to my attention!

    All my best,
    John

    ReplyDelete

30 Years Ago: Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994)

The tenth birthday of cinematic boogeyman Freddy Krueger should have been a big deal to start with, that's for sure.  Why? Well, in the ...