Creator of the award-winning web series, Abnormal Fixation. One of the horror genre's "most widely read critics" (Rue Morgue # 68), "an accomplished film journalist" (Comic Buyer's Guide #1535), and the award-winning author of Horror Films of the 1980s (2007) and Horror Films of the 1970s (2002), John Kenneth Muir, presents his blog on film, television and nostalgia, named one of the Top 100 Film Studies Blog on the Net.
Showing posts with label 1991. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1991. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 15, 2017
Lunch Box of the Week: Hook (1991)
Labels:
1991,
Hook,
Lunch Box of the Week
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
The Films of 1991: The Rocketeer
A
strange factoid about superhero movies -- which I've written much about lately -- is that period pieces rarely succeed at
the box office.
Doc
Savage: The Man of Bronze
(1975), The Shadow (1994), The Phantom (1996), and Sky
Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004) are all examples of
superhero movies set in yesteryear that failed to succeed with audiences.
In
2011, Joe Johnston’s Captain America: The First Avenger
beat that long-standing curse. Perhaps that success happened because the
director had faced the same problem once before with 1991’s The
Rocketeer, a brilliant and beautiful genre film that never achieved the
success it so abundantly deserves.
Why
do fans prefer modern superheroes over ones operating in the past?
Perhaps
it is because the superhero template is -- broadly -- similar to the Western
format, only with some technological upgrades. Substitute a cool car like the
Batmobile for Silver, and a man in a cape for a cowboy in a ten gallon hat, and
one can detect how alike the genres truly are.
In
both brands of stories, singular men (or sometimes women) tackle corruption and
evil, and then, largely, go on their way…until
needed again.
So
take a superhero hero movie out of the present, and you might just as well be
watching a Western.
Or
perhaps it is just too difficult for us to suspend disbelief in a period
superhero film. Audiences might accept a man in a cape fighting criminals in a
modern day urban jungle, but if it happened in, say, 1939, how come nobody ever
heard of the guy?
My
point is that a period superhero not only asks us to believe in one fantasy
element (a person with super powers, for instance), but two, if you count
alternate history.
One
can speculate any number of reasons why modern audiences will readily accept an
Indiana Jones, but not a Kit Walker or Lamont Cranston. The point is, I suppose, that audiences seem
to prefer superheroes with a hard, technological -- even futuristic --
edge. We want them saving our world, today,
operating on the bleeding edge of now.
And
in the case of The Rocketeer, it’s a crying shame that our tastes run in this
direction. As critic David Ansen observed,
regarding the film, it is “determinedly
sweet,” and features “action scenes that are more bouncy than bone-crunching.”
Because of such virtues, I have always considered The Rocketeer the spiritual heir to Superman:
The Movie (1978), my choice -- still -- for the best superhero film of
all time.
At
one point in The Rocketeer, a character notes “you’d pay to see a man to fly, wouldn’t you?” And indeed, Superman’s famous tag-line
was “You’ll believe a man can fly.”
People
flocked to Superman: The Movie in 1978 (in the immediate post-Watergate Age)
because they wanted to dream about just such a thing being a reality; they
wanted to “believe again.”
The
Rocketeer understands
perfectly that brand of emotional longing in general, and the long-standing
human fascination with flight in particular.
It
depicts the magic of leaving terra firma behind as pilots attempt to touch Heaven
itself. Indeed, the film’s hero, Cliff
Secord (Bill Campbell) discusses flight in precisely -- nay, explicitly -- those terms.
In the film’s denouement, he
discusses wearing the film’s rocket pack and getting as close to Heaven as is
possible for a living mortal. “It was the
closest I’ll ever get,” he says.
In
pure human terms, The Rocketeer is very much about that yearning to touch the
sky, and few modern superhero pictures feature such a direct and delightful, human through-line. Instead, they get
bogged down in character backgrounds, villainous plans, and byzantine
back-stories.
Beyond
that accomplishment, The Rocketeer lovingly (and
meticulously) revives 1930s Los Angeles, and features a great turn by Timothy
Dalton as a flamboyant villain.
Significantly,
there is no angst in The Rocketeer.
There
is no trademark genre darkness, cynicism or bitterness.
The
film doesn’t focus on revenge, either.
Instead,
The
Rocketeer is really about joy; the joy of flight, and, in a way that
can’t be diminished, the fact that love of country can bring people of unlike
backgrounds together. The movie, after all, ends with Italian mobsters, a
failed pilot, government agents and Howard Hughes banding together to stop a
Nazi invasion.
What
could be more American, or more ennobling, than that “flight” of fancy?
“I
may not make an honest buck, but I’m 100% American. I don’t work for no two-bit
Nazi.”
A
young pilot, Cliff Secord (Bill Campbell) becomes embroiled, accidentally in a
battle between Federal agents and gangsters. Through a strange set of
coincidences, he ends up with his hands on a new super-weapon, a rocket-pack
designed by Howard Hughes (Terry O’Quinn) called the X-3.
Hoping
to make a living after his plane is destroyed in the battle, Secord secretly
keeps the X-3, and has his resourceful mechanic friend, Peeve (Alan Arkin) make
him a helmet to go with the rocket.
Before long, he emerges as a hero the press dubs “The Rocketeer.”
Unfortunately,
the number 3 box office draw in America, Neville Sinclair (Timothy Dalton), is
actually a Nazi spy and has been tasked with stealing the X-3 and returning it
to the Fatherland. He is allied with mobster Eddie Valentine
(Paul Sorvino), though Valentine doesn’t know Sinclair’s true allegiance.
Sinclair
attempts to ingratiate himself with Secord’s aspiring actress girlfriend, Jenny
Blake (Jennifer Connelly) to get close to the X-3. When that doesn’t work, however, he resorts
to force. He abducts Jenny and makes a bargain with Secord: the rocket pack for
the girl.
Unfortunately,
Howard Hughes and the U.S. government also want the rocket pack back, and Cliff
must make a difficult choice.
“How
did it feel? Strapping that thing to your back and flying like a bat out of
Hell?
The
Rocketeer is adapted
from the work of graphic novel writer-illustrator Dave Stevens, who first
published the title in 1982. And
overall, the title, like the film, is an homage to and pastiche of the pulpy
genre entertainment of yesteryear.
For
example, the visual look of the title character seems inspired by Commando
Cody, a hero who wears a leather flight suit, a bullet-shaped helmet, and a jet
pack. The character head-lined in King of the Rocketmen (1952) and Radar
Men of the Moon (1953).
The
film, however, focuses much of its artistic vision on the 1930s milieu. The
audience encounters Hollywood legends Clark Gable and W.C. Fields, for example.
A singer in the South Seas Club croons tunes from Cole Porter. And the soldier villain, Lothar (Tiny Ron) is
a dead ringer for Rondo Hatton (1894-1946), a screen actor who suffered from Acromegaly, and put his fearsome visage to menacing use in films like The
Brute Man (1946).
The
film also reveals the evolution of the landmark Hollywood sign. It goes from
reading Hollywoodland (in 1923) to reading Hollywood (1949), all because of a
Nazi incursion on American soil. And
Neville Sinclair, of course, is a variation on film idol Errol Flynn (who was
once believed to be a Nazi spy, oddly enough…).
One
of the best moments in The Rocketeer, for my money, however
is the Nazi propaganda film featured in the last act. In a sort of Art Deco (or
Futura) style, we see an animated representation of the Nazi plan for world
domination using the X-3. The terrifying
(but beautifully-wrought) imagery shows rocket men destroying Washington DC, burning
the American flag, and raising the Swastika.
This short film sells perfectly (and cheaply) the threat that America
faces.
Thanks
to production designer Jim Bissell and director of photography Hiro Narita, The
Rocketeer looks fantastic. But
just as powerful, if not more so, is the movie’s sense of heart, and
innocence.
After
Secord saves a fellow pilot (dressed as a clown for an air show), and takes off
using the rocket for the first time, the film veritably soars. One might attribute this feeling of emotional
flight to James Horner’s musical score, or to the setting -- wide open wheat
fields under Big American Sky.
Whatever
the cause, this inaugural flight sequence is one of the few in superhero movie
history that legitimately deserves comparison to the Smallville interlude in
Donner’s Superman: the Movie. The
overwhelming feeling is for an age -- an innocence -- lost, but also a yearning
for Americana and the American Dream.
What
is that American Dream? In films such as The Rocketeer it involves the
achievement of something more than wealth or success. It involves doing great things; breaking
barriers; going where none have gone before. Touching the sky.
It
is an indicator of The Rocketeer’s unfettered gentleness and innocence that its call
to patriotism in the final act plays not as cheesy or overdone, but as authentically
stirring. We see a mobster, Eddie Valentine (Paul Sorvino) make common cause
with G-Men to stop a threat to America’s future: Nazi soldiers.
Then,
after he implores Secord to “go get”
the bad-guys, we get the glorious shot of The Rocketeer posed next to Old Glory
herself, the American flag. The not subtle (yet still wonderful…) message behind
this imagery is that Americans may have many, many differences, but in times of
strife and crisis, they come together.
Mobster
or G-Man, Americans draw strength from one another and defend their country --
and the ideals of their country -- when they are threatened. I still remember
seeing the film in the theater, and the audience hooted and hollered with
raucous energy when the Valentine expressed his love of country, and his urging
for Secord to fight the good fight. It
gives me chills thinking about it, even today.
In
some way, superhero movies are really about (or should be about…) the things we
can’t always do; the ideals we can’t always live by, even though we wish to.
Like
rising to the occasion in a crisis.
Or
strapping on a rocket pack and taking off into the sky; touching Heaven. The Rocketeer absolutely understands
this facet of the genre, and presents a kind of wish-fulfillment genre story of
the highest order.
The
Rocketeer is a
light, joyous film that never focuses on special effects over people. The film’s
feet never touch the ground, and the action scenes, particularly the final
set-piece on the Nazi dirigible, are memorable and well-orchestrated.
So
why didn’t audiences flock to the film?
I
think that goes back to my original point about audiences deliberately
not-seeking out period superhero efforts. Even Captain America, Joe
Johnston’s genre follow-up to The Rocketeer, eventually reaches
the 21st century, right? Some
people might see that development as hedging a bet; protecting against an
undesirable outcome (financial failure).
Today,
superhero films have largely become mechanical and formulaic. They give us
everything we expect as part of some multi-media franchise experience (the
teaser, the trailer, the second act surprise, and the post-credits reveal or
preview for the next picture), but somehow forget to hold up as narratives, as
movies that live and breathe and tell us something vital about human nature.
The
Rocketeer makes
us believe that a man (and America with him, in one of its darkest hours)…can
fly.
You’d
pay to see that, wouldn’t you?
I know I would.
Labels:
1991,
The Films of 1991
Thursday, July 09, 2015
Cult-Movie Review: The Rocketeer (1991)
A
strange factoid about superhero movies is that period pieces rarely succeed at
the box office.
Doc
Savage: The Man of Bronze
(1975), The Shadow (1994), The Phantom (1996), and Sky
Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004) are all examples of
superhero movies set in yesteryear that failed to succeed with audiences.
In
2011, Joe Johnston’s Captain America: The First Avenger
beat that long-standing curse. Perhaps that success happened because the
director had faced the same problem once before with 1991’s The
Rocketeer, a brilliant and beautiful genre film that never achieved the
success it so abundantly deserves.
Why
do fans prefer modern superheroes over ones operating in the past?
Perhaps
it is because the superhero template is -- broadly -- similar to the Western
format, only with some technological upgrades. Substitute a cool car like the
Batmobile for Silver, and a man in a cape for a cowboy in a ten gallon hat, and
one can detect how alike the genres truly are.
In
both brands of stories, singular men (or sometimes women) tackle corruption and
evil, and then, largely, go on their way…until
needed again.
So
take a superhero hero movie out of the present, and you might just as well be
watching a Western.
Or
perhaps it is just too difficult for us to suspend disbelief in a period
superhero film. Audiences might accept a man in a cape fighting criminals in a
modern day urban jungle, but if it happened in, say, 1939, how come nobody ever
heard of the guy?
My
point is that a period superhero not only asks us to believe in one fantasy
element (a person with super powers, for instance), but two, if you count
alternate history.
One
can speculate any number of reasons why modern audiences will readily accept an
Indiana Jones, but not a Kit Walker or Lamont Cranston. The point is, I suppose, that audiences seem
to prefer superheroes with a hard, technological -- even futuristic --
edge. We want them saving our world, today,
operating on the bleeding edge of now.
And
in the case of The Rocketeer, it’s a crying shame that our tastes run in this
direction. As critic David Ansen observed,
regarding the film, it is “determinedly
sweet,” and features “action scenes that are more bouncy than bone-crunching.”
Because of such virtues, I have always considered The Rocketeer the spiritual heir to Superman:
The Movie (1978), my choice -- still -- for the best superhero film of
all time.
At
one point in The Rocketeer, a character notes “you’d pay to see a man to fly, wouldn’t you?” And indeed, Superman’s famous tag-line
was “You’ll believe a man can fly.”
People
flocked to Superman: The Movie in 1978 (in the immediate post-Watergate Age)
because they wanted to dream about just such a thing being a reality; they
wanted to “believe again.”
The
Rocketeer understands
perfectly that brand of emotional longing in general, and the long-standing
human fascination with flight in particular.
It
depicts the magic of leaving terra firma behind as pilots attempt to touch Heaven
itself. Indeed, the film’s hero, Cliff
Secord (Bill Campbell) discusses flight in precisely -- nay, explicitly -- those terms.
In the film’s denouement, he
discusses wearing the film’s rocket pack and getting as close to Heaven as is
possible for a living mortal. “It was the
closest I’ll ever get,” he says.
In
pure human terms, The Rocketeer is very much about that yearning to touch the
sky, and few modern superhero pictures feature such a direct and delightful, human through-line. Instead, they get
bogged down in character backgrounds, villainous plans, and byzantine
back-stories.
Beyond
that accomplishment, The Rocketeer lovingly (and
meticulously) revives 1930s Los Angeles, and features a great turn by Timothy
Dalton as a flamboyant villain.
Significantly,
there is no angst in The Rocketeer.
There
is no trademark genre darkness, cynicism or bitterness.
The
film doesn’t focus on revenge, either.
Instead,
The
Rocketeer is really about joy; the joy of flight, and, in a way that
can’t be diminished, the fact that love of country can bring people of unlike
backgrounds together. The movie, after all, ends with Italian mobsters, a
failed pilot, government agents and Howard Hughes banding together to stop a
Nazi invasion.
What
could be more American, or more ennobling, than that “flight” of fancy?
“I
may not make an honest buck, but I’m 100% American. I don’t work for no two-bit
Nazi.”
A
young pilot, Cliff Secord (Bill Campbell) becomes embroiled, accidentally in a
battle between Federal agents and gangsters. Through a strange set of
coincidences, he ends up with his hands on a new super-weapon, a rocket-pack
designed by Howard Hughes (Terry O’Quinn) called the X-3.
Hoping
to make a living after his plane is destroyed in the battle, Secord secretly
keeps the X-3, and has his resourceful mechanic friend, Peeve (Alan Arkin) make
him a helmet to go with the rocket.
Before long, he emerges as a hero the press dubs “The Rocketeer.”
Unfortunately,
the number 3 box office draw in America, Neville Sinclair (Timothy Dalton), is
actually a Nazi spy and has been tasked with stealing the X-3 and returning it
to the Fatherland. He is allied with mobster Eddie Valentine
(Paul Sorvino), though Valentine doesn’t know Sinclair’s true allegiance.
Sinclair
attempts to ingratiate himself with Secord’s aspiring actress girlfriend, Jenny
Blake (Jennifer Connelly) to get close to the X-3. When that doesn’t work, however, he resorts
to force. He abducts Jenny and makes a bargain with Secord: the rocket pack for
the girl.
Unfortunately,
Howard Hughes and the U.S. government also want the rocket pack back, and Cliff
must make a difficult choice.
“How
did it feel? Strapping that thing to your back and flying like a bat out of
Hell?
The
Rocketeer is adapted
from the work of graphic novel writer-illustrator Dave Stevens, who first
published the title in 1982. And
overall, the title, like the film, is an homage to and pastiche of the pulpy
genre entertainment of yesteryear.
For
example, the visual look of the title character seems inspired by Commando
Cody, a hero who wears a leather flight suit, a bullet-shaped helmet, and a jet
pack. The character head-lined in King of the Rocketmen (1952) and Radar
Men of the Moon (1953).
The
film, however, focuses much of its artistic vision on the 1930s milieu. The
audience encounters Hollywood legends Clark Gable and W.C. Fields, for example.
A singer in the South Seas Club croons tunes from Cole Porter. And the soldier villain, Lothar (Tiny Ron) is
a dead ringer for Rondo Hatton (1894-1946), a screen actor who suffered from Acromegaly, and put his fearsome visage to menacing use in films like The
Brute Man (1946).
The
film also reveals the evolution of the landmark Hollywood sign. It goes from
reading Hollywoodland (in 1923) to reading Hollywood (1949), all because of a
Nazi incursion on American soil. And
Neville Sinclair, of course, is a variation on film idol Errol Flynn (who was
once believed to be a Nazi spy, oddly enough…).
One
of the best moments in The Rocketeer, for my money, however
is the Nazi propaganda film featured in the last act. In a sort of Art Deco (or
Futura) style, we see an animated representation of the Nazi plan for world
domination using the X-3. The terrifying
(but beautifully-wrought) imagery shows rocket men destroying Washington DC, burning
the American flag, and raising the Swastika.
This short film sells perfectly (and cheaply) the threat that America
faces.
Thanks
to production designer Jim Bissell and director of photography Hiro Narita, The
Rocketeer looks fantastic. But
just as powerful, if not more so, is the movie’s sense of heart, and
innocence.
After
Secord saves a fellow pilot (dressed as a clown for an air show), and takes off
using the rocket for the first time, the film veritably soars. One might attribute this feeling of emotional
flight to James Horner’s musical score, or to the setting -- wide open wheat
fields under Big American Sky.
Whatever
the cause, this inaugural flight sequence is one of the few in superhero movie
history that legitimately deserves comparison to the Smallville interlude in
Donner’s Superman: the Movie. The
overwhelming feeling is for an age -- an innocence -- lost, but also a yearning
for Americana and the American Dream.
What
is that American Dream? In films such as The Rocketeer it involves the
achievement of something more than wealth or success. It involves doing great things; breaking
barriers; going where none have gone before. Touching the sky.
It
is an indicator of The Rocketeer’s unfettered gentleness and innocence that its call
to patriotism in the final act plays not as cheesy or overdone, but as authentically
stirring. We see a mobster, Eddie Valentine (Paul Sorvino) make common cause
with G-Men to stop a threat to America’s future: Nazi soldiers.
Then,
after he implores Secord to “go get”
the bad-guys, we get the glorious shot of The Rocketeer posed next to Old Glory
herself, the American flag. The not subtle (yet still wonderful…) message behind
this imagery is that Americans may have many, many differences, but in times of
strife and crisis, they come together.
Mobster
or G-Man, Americans draw strength from one another and defend their country --
and the ideals of their country -- when they are threatened. I still remember
seeing the film in the theater, and the audience hooted and hollered with
raucous energy when the Valentine expressed his love of country, and his urging
for Secord to fight the good fight. It
gives me chills thinking about it, even today.
In
some way, superhero movies are really about (or should be about…) the things we
can’t always do; the ideals we can’t always live by, even though we wish to.
Like
rising to the occasion in a crisis.
Or
strapping on a rocket pack and taking off into the sky; touching Heaven. The Rocketeer absolutely understands
this facet of the genre, and presents a kind of wish-fulfillment genre story of
the highest order.
The
Rocketeer is a
light, joyous film that never focuses on special effects over people. The film’s
feet never touch the ground, and the action scenes, particularly the final
set-piece on the Nazi dirigible, are memorable and well-orchestrated.
So
why didn’t audiences flock to the film?
I
think that goes back to my original point about audiences deliberately
not-seeking out period superhero efforts. Even Captain America, Joe
Johnston’s genre follow-up to The Rocketeer, eventually reaches
the 21st century, right? Some
people might see that development as hedging a bet; protecting against an
undesirable outcome (financial failure).
Today,
superhero films have largely become mechanical and formulaic. They give us
everything we expect as part of some multi-media franchise experience (the
teaser, the trailer, the second act surprise, and the post-credits reveal or
preview for the next picture), but somehow forget to hold up as narratives, as
movies that live and breathe and tell us something about human nature.
The
Rocketeer makes
us believe that a man (and America with him, in one of its darkest hours)…can
fly.
You’d
pay to see that, wouldn’t you?
I know I would.
Labels:
1991,
cult-movie review,
superheroes,
The Rocketeer
Movie Trailer: The Rocketeer (1991)
Labels:
1991,
movie trailer,
superheroes,
The Rocketeer
Thursday, March 12, 2015
The Films of 1991: Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey
The
difference between the two Bill and Ted movies is a profound and noteworthy
one.
Bill
and Ted’s Excellent Adventure (1989) is a low-brow comedy about two
dumb dudes from San Dimas.
Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) by contrast is a high-brow comedy about the same dumb dudes.
Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) by contrast is a high-brow comedy about the same dumb dudes.
Bill
and Ted’s Bogus Journey
is not only more intricately plotted than its predecessor was -- featuring an authentically Orphean
journey to the Underworld -- but its comedy is much more layered and
sophisticated too.
Before it finishes up, this film jabs science fiction tropes, and Star Trek (1966-1969), specifically, but also patiently (and humorously) develops a satire based on Ingmar Bergman’s masterpiece, The Seventh Seal (1967).
Before it finishes up, this film jabs science fiction tropes, and Star Trek (1966-1969), specifically, but also patiently (and humorously) develops a satire based on Ingmar Bergman’s masterpiece, The Seventh Seal (1967).
The
result is a film that never has a dull moment, and is never less than searingly funny. The big problem with Bill and Ted’s
Excellent Adventure is that, outside the Napoleon character -- who was given
substantial screen time -- none of the historical figures the duo encountered
came across as real characters, only one-note jokes.
In
Bogus
Journey, Bill and Ted meet Death -- the Grim Reaper (William Sadler) --
and he is a great character: vain, insecure, over-confident and silly as
hell. The two (alien?) scientists from
Heaven (!), Station also grab the spotlight for a while, and are genuinely
amusing.
Finally,
the creative decision to add a real villain in the person of De Nomolos (Joss Ackland) -- someone dead set against Bill and Ted’s inevitable success -- grants the film a sense of
urgency and import that the original lacked.
It
is relatively rare for a genre sequel to thoroughly out-strip the source material, but in the
case of Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey, that’s the real story. The film’s cerebral approach to comedy
elevates this 1991 film, and expands the reach of the franchise in dramatic fashion.
In
fact, Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey is so good it’s a genuine shame a
second sequel has never been produced.
“Get
down and give me infinity!”
Bill
Preston (Alex Winter) and Theodore Logan (Keanu Reeves) approach “the second
crucial point in their destiny,” the San Dimas Battle of the Bands…which is
televised.
But in the far future world that worships them, the evil De Nomolos (Ackland) sends homicidal Bill and Ted lookalike
robots back in time to sabotage the duo’s chances at the show, and --
preferably -- kill them.
Rufus (George Carlin) manages to enter the time vortex after the robots, but is soon determined to be missing.
Rufus (George Carlin) manages to enter the time vortex after the robots, but is soon determined to be missing.
Back in the 20th century, the
two robots do their dirty work. They drive Bill and Ted out to Vasquez Rocks
and murder them.
Now restless spirits,
Bill and Ted attempt to possess the living, and communicate at a séance,
and then end up relegated to the pits of Hell.
They
escape from Hell by challenging the Grim Reaper (Sadler) to a game, or several
games, to be more accurate.
They beat him at Twister (following games of Battleship and Clue), and force Death to bring them back to life. The Grim Reaper complies, and then takes them to Heaven, where Bill and Ted petition God to help defeat the evil robots.
They beat him at Twister (following games of Battleship and Clue), and force Death to bring them back to life. The Grim Reaper complies, and then takes them to Heaven, where Bill and Ted petition God to help defeat the evil robots.
God
provides a great scientist/creature called “Station” to help out, but the
Battle of the Bands is nearing, and the evil robots have captured the
princesses!
“I
think we’re in our own personal Hell.”
Like
Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey gets a lot of
mileage out of the boys’ manner of expression.
It was odd and amusing hearing them use surfer speak in various historical contexts in the first film, but even funnier to witness them address beings of Heaven and Hell in this one.
“How’s it going, Beelzabub?” for instance, or “How’s it hanging, Death?”
Also, it’s impossible not to laugh at the moment here in which Bill and Ted pull a Uranus joke on the Almighty Lord. And,-- ridiculously -- this moment comes after they have mugged peaceful souls arriving in Heaven and stolen their clothes.
It was odd and amusing hearing them use surfer speak in various historical contexts in the first film, but even funnier to witness them address beings of Heaven and Hell in this one.
“How’s it going, Beelzabub?” for instance, or “How’s it hanging, Death?”
Also, it’s impossible not to laugh at the moment here in which Bill and Ted pull a Uranus joke on the Almighty Lord. And,-- ridiculously -- this moment comes after they have mugged peaceful souls arriving in Heaven and stolen their clothes.
But
Bill and Ted’s manner of speech isn’t the only joke worth noting here, and that’s
what makes Bogus Journey so much fun.
This films throws up the sci-fi cliché or trope of evil android duplicates, and then puts them in a plot that directly reflects a Star Trek episode.
Specifically, Bill and Ted watch “Arena” on TV...the episode with Kirk fighting the Gorn at Vasquez Rocks. We view footage of William Shatner at that famous natural landmark on their TV set. Then, in the very next scene, we get identical shots of Bill and Ted at the same locale, fighting their own enemy.
This films throws up the sci-fi cliché or trope of evil android duplicates, and then puts them in a plot that directly reflects a Star Trek episode.
Specifically, Bill and Ted watch “Arena” on TV...the episode with Kirk fighting the Gorn at Vasquez Rocks. We view footage of William Shatner at that famous natural landmark on their TV set. Then, in the very next scene, we get identical shots of Bill and Ted at the same locale, fighting their own enemy.
Later,
the target for satire is Ingmar Bergman’s lugubrious The Seventh Seal.
In that film, Max Von Sydow’s character, Antonius Block, plays a chess game with Death -- a monk-like, bald-figure in a black cowl -- for his survival. The chess game is a symbol in the Swedish film, and it is believed, by the movie's characters, that no force can beat death. For humans, it is always check and mate, sooner or later.
In that film, Max Von Sydow’s character, Antonius Block, plays a chess game with Death -- a monk-like, bald-figure in a black cowl -- for his survival. The chess game is a symbol in the Swedish film, and it is believed, by the movie's characters, that no force can beat death. For humans, it is always check and mate, sooner or later.
In
Bill and Ted, however, Death plays the dudes in a variety of board games, and
loses every match.
The film features a very funny scene involving several different popular games as Death is beaten -- a terrible player, apparently -- again and again. The final interlude of this montage involves Twister.
The film features a very funny scene involving several different popular games as Death is beaten -- a terrible player, apparently -- again and again. The final interlude of this montage involves Twister.
Other
scenes also hit just the right notes. There’s a short scene near the beginning
of the film when Bill and Ted -- now dead -- possess the bodies of two police
officers in their fifties (played by Hal Linden Jr., and Roy Brocksmith).
Suddenly these aging, balding men in their fifties begin gesticulating and talking like surfers, and the scene earns some big laughs.
Suddenly these aging, balding men in their fifties begin gesticulating and talking like surfers, and the scene earns some big laughs.
The
scenes in Hell don’t last that long, but manage to be both amusing and
disturbing. Bill, for example, must
attend to his ancient, hairy-lipped, lip-smacking grandmother…who wants a sloppy
wet kiss. And Ted contends with a
demonic, animatronic Easter Bunny.
They also go to the hellish equivalent of Military School, where they are ordered to drop and do "infinity" push ups.
They also go to the hellish equivalent of Military School, where they are ordered to drop and do "infinity" push ups.
The
difference in approach between the films is telling. There’s no real comedy in the time travel scenes of the original, wherein Bill and Ted meet Socrates, or Billy the
Kid for example. These moments are devoid of any pacing or real humor. They just kind of land with a thud.
But in Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey, the screenwriters move effortlessly from joke to joke, from Star Trek gag to Grim Reaper gag, from, possession gag to Hell gag, to Heaven gag, and so on. The film veritably speeds by on its humorous high points, and ends before you can think twice about any gaps in logic.
But in Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey, the screenwriters move effortlessly from joke to joke, from Star Trek gag to Grim Reaper gag, from, possession gag to Hell gag, to Heaven gag, and so on. The film veritably speeds by on its humorous high points, and ends before you can think twice about any gaps in logic.
Alas,
there are a few.
Rufus established in Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure that time runs on always-moving tracks. In other words, the clock continues for time travelers even when they are traveling.
But in Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey, the duo violates this rule, able to leave the Battle of the Bands to learn how to play guitar, and then come back to that very moment in time, as if no duration elapsed. Given the rules established in the first film, how'd they manage this?
A little more thought about how time travel works in this universe would have made the film all the stronger.
On the other hand, this sequel does expand the franchise universe in other memorable ways. We see the depths of Hell, the architecture of Heaven, and even Bill and Ted University in the future. The original film had all of human history to explore, and yet felt like a cheap TV show.
By comparison, Bogus Journey is as big and weird as existence itself.
Rufus established in Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure that time runs on always-moving tracks. In other words, the clock continues for time travelers even when they are traveling.
But in Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey, the duo violates this rule, able to leave the Battle of the Bands to learn how to play guitar, and then come back to that very moment in time, as if no duration elapsed. Given the rules established in the first film, how'd they manage this?
A little more thought about how time travel works in this universe would have made the film all the stronger.
On the other hand, this sequel does expand the franchise universe in other memorable ways. We see the depths of Hell, the architecture of Heaven, and even Bill and Ted University in the future. The original film had all of human history to explore, and yet felt like a cheap TV show.
By comparison, Bogus Journey is as big and weird as existence itself.
One
key reason that Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey succeeds goes by the name of
William Sadler.
He’s been baddies (Die Harder [1990]) and a supporting, fatherly figure (Roswell) before, but the actor demonstrates real comedy chops as the Grim Reaper in this film. He comes off as pathetic, desperate, and a hanger-on, but ultimately, a worthy ally for the non-judgmental Bill and Ted. He's a great sidekick and foil for the duo, a would-be regal figure brought to a point far below his ostensible dignity.
He’s been baddies (Die Harder [1990]) and a supporting, fatherly figure (Roswell) before, but the actor demonstrates real comedy chops as the Grim Reaper in this film. He comes off as pathetic, desperate, and a hanger-on, but ultimately, a worthy ally for the non-judgmental Bill and Ted. He's a great sidekick and foil for the duo, a would-be regal figure brought to a point far below his ostensible dignity.
Finally, this sequel conforms to one of my favorite rock movie cliches of all time: A great rock show can change the world (to quote Jack Black in 2004's School of Rock).
That's very much what happens here, as Bill and Ted's music changes the fabric of reality itself. The film's end credits amusingly feature magazine covers charting the rise of Wyld Stallyns and Bill and Ted to ever greater heights (including a mission to Mars).
Bill and Ted may go through Hell, literally, during their bogus journey, but for this reviewer, the 1991 sequel is actually a lot closer to Heaven, with nearly every crazy, inventive gag hitting its mark, and hitting it hard.
That's very much what happens here, as Bill and Ted's music changes the fabric of reality itself. The film's end credits amusingly feature magazine covers charting the rise of Wyld Stallyns and Bill and Ted to ever greater heights (including a mission to Mars).
Bill and Ted may go through Hell, literally, during their bogus journey, but for this reviewer, the 1991 sequel is actually a lot closer to Heaven, with nearly every crazy, inventive gag hitting its mark, and hitting it hard.
Labels:
1991,
Bill and Ted,
cult-movie review,
The Films of 1991
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
It is quite difficult to believe, but in 2024, Ridley Scott’s Alien (1979) turns 45 years old. Perhaps the most amazing thing about Alie...
-
It is an indisputable fact that fan service and good drama don’t always go hand-in-hand in the cinema. In fact, sometimes these factors div...


























