Saturday, May 04, 2013

Saturday Morning Cult-TV Blogging: Shazam: "The Boy Who Said 'No.'" (October 24, 1974)



“The Boy Who Said No” might be the weirdest and wildest episode yet of Filmation’s live-action 1970s series, Shazam (1974 – 1977).   It begins as another “moral of the week” story about a kid making good choices, but ends with a crazy double chase sequence.

In “The Boy Who Said No,” Mentor (Les Tremayne) and Billy Batson (Michael Gray) stop for groceries and park their RV.  While Billy is at the store, Mentor gets robbed, however, by a juvenile delinquent named Ron Craig.  A young boy, Larry Burn, sees Ron at the scene of the crime, but refuses to i.d. the crook because Ron has threatened and bullied him into silence.

The Elders inform Billy that he should “translate” his concern “into fitting action,” but Billy can’t get Larry to budge.  When Ron shows up at Larry’s ranch, however and abducts his father, it’s time to call in Captain Marvel.  The jittery Ron attempts to evade capture first by stealing a helicopter and taking off, and then by car-jacking Mentor’s RV…with Mentor and Larry inside!

The moral of the week comes from Captain Marvel (Jackson Bostwick), who tells young Larry that all the violence and pursuit could have been avoided if only he’d reported Ron in the first place.  The boy admits he was “afraid to get involved.” 



The kooky aspect of “The Boy Who Said No” arises in the depiction of Ron, the juvenile delinquent.  After robbing an old man in an RV, he commits crimes much worse to evade capture.  He kidnaps three different individuals, and steals two vehicles.  That seems like a lot of work -- and a lot of extra time in jail --- over a wallet that couldn’t have had much money in it.  In other words, in order to evade the authorities for one crime, Ron commits much, much worse crimes.  It makes no sense whatsoever.  At the end of the episode, Ron says he just “needed money,” but if that were the case, why wouldn’t he have surrendered earlier, instead of gravely compounding his guilt?

Mentor is also downright weird in this episode.  He keeps making jokes about eating lunch.  After he is attacked by Ron, for instance, Mentor doesn’t appear overly concerned, and says “Yeah…but what about lunch?”  And at the end of the episode, Mentor says he learned the lesson of the week too: “Don’t skip lunch.”   This is just…strange.  Maybe that knock on the head by Ron really did poor Mentor some damage…




In terms of action, “The Boy Who Said No’ featured twice as much action as most episodes of Shazam, with Captain Marvel pursuing a criminal by air and by land.  The effects involving Captain Marvel grappling with a helicopter in flight actually hold up pretty well, thanks to some better-than-average stunt work.  There’s also a good shot of Marvel grabbing on to a passing tunnel and braking the stolen RV.

Next Week: “The Doom Buggy.”

2 comments:

  1. It's believable how Ron robbed Mentor with (off-screen) violence, but his commandeering of the helicopter and the RV aren't; in realty, Larry's father could've smacked around the skinny punk easily, and Larry and Mentor could've overpowered him in the RV, two against one.

    If only Mentor had his lunch, there wouldn't be this whole affair!

    This was the episode that turned me on to Shazam completely. The stunts are still cool (though low tech) nearly forty years after being first broadcast on TV. It's remarkable to know it was actually Jackson Bostwick (Marvel) hanging off the copter (in part?) and on top of the RV (going at forty mph, according to Bostwick). How that thrilled me as a kid!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:03 PM

    John nice review of an episode with characters not making sense. The juvenile delinquent acted as though he was on drugs by committing worse crimes. Mentor's dialogue regarding "lunch" must be simply that the writer of this episode was hungry :) .

    SGB

    ReplyDelete

30 Years Ago: Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994)

The tenth birthday of cinematic boogeyman Freddy Krueger should have been a big deal to start with, that's for sure.  Why? Well, in the ...