One of the horror genre's "most widely read critics" (Rue Morgue # 68), "an accomplished film journalist" (Comic Buyer's Guide #1535), and the award-winning author of Horror Films of the 1980s (2007), The Rock and Roll Film Encyclopedia (2007) and Horror Films of the 1970s (2002), John Kenneth Muir, presents his blog on film, television and nostalgia, named one of the Top 100 Film Studies Blog on the Net.
Sunday, November 27, 2016
Retro Toy Flashback: Computer Perfection
Lakeside's Electronic Perfection was billed in 1979 as "the ultimate playmate" and the same advertising noted that the game “pushes you to your limit.”
Those phrases conjure all kinds of suggestive
imagery, but Computer Perfection is, simply, an electronic game of the disco
decade, and a competitor for the likes of MERLIN, or SIMON.
In Computer Perfection, the toy’s transparent
blue dome acts as "an on/off switch,"
according to the instructions. Once you lift the blue dome, you can select from
four games, and choose from three skill levels.
Game One is "Countdown" (a one-player scenario), in which the object is "to light all 10 lights in the proper order, in the least number of move.”
Game One is "Countdown" (a one-player scenario), in which the object is "to light all 10 lights in the proper order, in the least number of move.”
Game Two is "Black Hole" (also for one
player). The object of Black Hole is the same as Countdown, lighting all the
lights in the proper order. The difference: if "you press a button already lit, the computer will turn off all the
lights that are ahead of that light, plus the light itself."
Game Three is "Brain Battle." This is a
two player game. The player on the left must turn off all the lights starting
with number one; the second player must turn all lights on, starting with
number six.
Game Four is "Light Race" in which the object is a "Race" to turn on more than five lights. It is also for two players.
Game Four is "Light Race" in which the object is a "Race" to turn on more than five lights. It is also for two players.
Listed as being suitable for ages 8 to adult, the
box notes that Computer Perfection provides "4 unique ELECTRONIC games…Thousands
of variations.”
On the back of the box, the game also addresses
the player. "GREETINGS, I am COMPUTER
PERFECTION," it
states, "the ultimate playmate. Probe my memory to discover the electronic
clues that will light my lights in the proper order. Do it as quick as you can and
I will keep score. Take too long - I will turn you off. Choose a new game every
time or ask me to repeat your last game to improve your score."
Computer Perfection’s main media claim to fame,
beyond its game play, is a cameo appearance during the second season of Buck
Rogers in the 25th Century (1979-1981). In the episode “Mark of the
Saurian,” Computer Perfection’s tell-tale blue dome can be spotted next to Buck
(Gil Gerard’s) bedside in the Searcher sick bay.
Below, a TV commercial for Computer Perfection:
Saturday, November 26, 2016
Saturday Morning Cult-TV Blogging: Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle: "Tarzan and the Forbidden City" (October 2, 1976)
In
“Tarzan and the Forbidden City,” a hunter brings his daughter Kelly into the
jungle on a quest to locate Tarzan. The
hunter’s need is desperate. His son Brian has disappeared near the Forbidden
City, Ushare, a metropolis built on a volcano called Tuen Baka.
A
second group of hunters are also in search of the city. The denizens there are rumored to possess a
gem of rare value, known as “The Father
of Diamonds.”
Tarzan
undertakes the quest, and helps Brian and the hunters learn that there is
nothing more precious “than life.”
The
fourth episode of Filmation’s Legend of Tarzan (1976-1980) is a
loose adaptation of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ twentieth Tarzan novel, written in
1938. Both the episode and the book share a title: Tarzan and the Forbidden City,
and a plot line.
Namely, both involve
the search for a missing adventurer, Brian Gregory, and the search for a
treasure called the Father of Diamonds.
The
two stories differ in a crucial way. In the book, Tarzan and Brian resemble one
another, and are mistaken for one another.
That element is not retained in this episode. However, both the book and this cartoon share
a climactic revelation: the “Father of Diamonds” is not a diamond, or rare, at
all.
It’s just a lump of coal. One day, of course, long in the future, it
will be a diamond.
In
other words, the search for wealth here is a brand of Fool’s Gold. Men have
been imperiled, families separated, in a vain search for something that is not
a real treasure. “Men are strange
beasts,” Tarzan notes in the book. In
the TV show, he makes the comment that the real treasure we can all have is
life, and Brian notes that “wealth is no longer important” to him.
“Tarzan
and the Forbidden City” is an intriguing episode of the series not only because
of its considerable fidelity to Burroughs’ original vision, but because of the
technology in the City of Ascher. It seems like it would be home in 20,000
Leagues under the Sea too.
Here,
Tarzan fights a giant octopus and encounters city-dwellers who wear undersea
suits and have considerable undersea technology.
I
realize I am only four episodes in at this point, but this Filmation series
seems quite superior to some of the other animated output of the company. Indeed, it approaches the level of Filmation’s
Star Trek (1973), to some degree. So far
the stories are exceptional, the animation is solid (for TV of the time), and
the adaptation from the source material is on a high level.
Next
week: “Tarzan and the Graveyard of Elephants.
Saturday Morning Cult-TV Blogging: Shazam: "Debbie" (September 13, 1975)
In
“Debbie,” Mentor and Billy are attempting to take a selfie when a message
arrives from the Elders.
They speak to
Billy of a “parent’s authority,” and how that authority expresses “love.” The Elders also warn of a person who “disrespects
authority.”
These
cryptic musings become more comprehensible after Billy and Mentor encounter Tom
(Harry Moses) and Debbie (Cindy Henderson), two young teenagers who are nearly
killed on a joy ride.
Debbie’s mother
doesn’t approve of Tom and wants Debbie to stop seeing him. Debbie sneaks out
in a car, however to see him. She defies her mother's wishes.
This
time, Tom’s driving nearly gets Debbie killed by a truck…until Captain Marvel
(John Davey) intervenes.
John
Davey stars as Captain Marvel in this week’s episode of Shazam (1974-1976),
taking over for Jackson Bostwick.
To
make things more confusing, Bostwick is back in next week’s episode (“Fool’s
Gold,”) and then Davey takes over again, but for the remainder of the series.
It’s
a bit of a shock seeing Davey portray Captain Marvel, especially if you are used
to Bostwick’s portrayal. Davey is not fat by any means, but he is stockier;
heavier built. It’s a different look all
together. Accordingly it’s a little difficult to picture the lithe Billy Batson
turning into this guy; who is more like a heavy-weight boxer than a lean superhero. Davey is by no means bad in the role, but
seeing him replace Bostwick, at least at first, is a jolt.
The
episode Davey is premieres in is also a bit of a disappointment. Basically, this whole episode is a plea to
teenagers to just listen to their parents…because parents are usually
right. Their authority, says the
episode, is just a form of love
I
don’t know about this, frankly. I’m a parent, but I still
don’t care for the heavy-handedness of this message. This is supposed to be a show for kids,
working their way to adulthood. The insanely pro-parent message smacks a bit of
indoctrination if you ask me.
Shazam
should be a series that always stands up for kids, and their right to
explore their world. It doesn’t need to
tow any agenda for parents, so kids obey them.
Here,
of course, Debbie’s Mom is right about her boyfriend, Tom, and learns the error
of her ways, even apologizing to her Mother.
This plays more like an adult’s
fantasy of parenting than what parenting is actually like. It's a very one sided story.
The
episode’s high point occurs when Captain Marvel gets to pick up a car, and move
it out of the way of an oncoming truck on the highway. This seems like a
relatively big-budget effect, and perhaps it was included to make Davey’s
premiere memorable.
Next
Week: “Fool’s Gold.”
Friday, November 25, 2016
Thanksgiving Blogging: Godzilla vs. Megalon (1976)
Although it was produced in 1973,
Godzilla
vs. Megalon was not released in the United States until 1976, the very year
of King
Kong’s return to the silver screen under the auspices of Dino De
Laurentiis.
Accordingly, this Japanese
monster mash was a huge success in an America primed for a new monster movie.
Godzilla
vs. Megalon’s
success may have been due in part to the evocative and colorful poster art of
the film which dramatically aped King Kong’s and showed Godzilla and
Megalon standing astride the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers.
Needless to say, in the actual
film, Godzilla and Megalon never got close to Manhattan, or anywhere
in the Western Hemisphere, for that matter.
Still, that poster is gorgeous.
After an incredibly successful run
at the American box office, Godzilla vs. Megalon took another
victory lap, airing on prime-time NBC in 1977 -- in an hour-long slot -- and it
drew impressive ratings. John Belushi hosted the presentation.
In the early 1990s, the Mystery
Science Theater 3000 (1988 – 1999) gang riffed on Godzilla vs. Megalon to
great comedic effect, and for years the series’ opening credits showed a clip
of Godzilla’s impressive -- and bizarrely
humorous -- jump kick in the movie.
Despite all the pop culture
success and sense of nostalgia that surrounds this election year entry of the
Godzilla saga, Godzilla vs. Megalon has never struck me as a particularly good
movie, or a particularly strong entry in the Godzilla canon.
The reason why is simple: the
movie needs more Godzilla and less Jet Jaguar.
The underwater kingdom of
Seatopia sends a giant creature called Megalon, to destroy the surface world,
which has been conducting dangerous nuclear tests for years, and therefore is
threatening all life on the Earth.
Meanwhile, a Japanese scientist,
Goro and his young nephew, Rokuro test an amazing new robot called Jet Jaguar
that becomes of great importance to the Seatopians and Megalon.
Realizing that their robot can
help save the world, Goro and Rokuro summon Jaguar to call on the help of
Godzilla, who is now living on Monster Island.
But the Seatopians also call for
reinforcements, and tag the monstrous Gigan to help Megalon destroy Godzilla.
With the survival of Tokyo and
the world hanging in the balance, Jet Jaguar grows to enormous size to team up
with Godzilla.
With apologies to my seven year
old, Joel -- who loves Megalon with a passion -- as well as my Facebook friends
who also adore this movie, Godzilla vs. Megalon is not one of
my favorite Godzilla movies.
In terms of the James Bond
standard I enunciated in my previous review, we do great villain here, I must
admit, in the giant, bug-headed, drill-handed menace known as Megalon. Joel loves Megalon with a passion, and when
we play together and wrestle, he is always Megalon, and I’m always Godzilla.
Yet in part, Godzilla vs. Megalon
fails because Godzilla does not even appear until late in the action, and seems
to be an after-thought in the narrative. Instead, the film functions largely as
origin story for the unknown and new hero: Jet Jaguar, a robot with the
baffling ability to grow to Godzilla-esque proportions and then shrink back.
How on Earth (or Seatopia for that
matter) is his metal so flexible that it can stretch to giant size and then
retract to human size?
Alas, even putting aside such
question of logic, Jet Jaguar -- a kind
of poor man’s Ultraman -- just can’t carry the story on his silver
shoulders, or make-up for Godzilla’s frequent absence. Imagine a James Bond film in which 007 didn’t
appear until sometime late in the second act, and you get the idea.
Godzilla
vs. Megalon
is not entirely bereft of good ideas, to be certain. Though barely enunciated, there’s absolutely a
critique here about nuclear arms that fits in with the franchise’s noble
tradition of questioning atomic power and man’s usage of it.
Here, the Seatopians send Megalon
to the surface because of the nuclear testing performed by the nations of the
world.
The Seatopians’ final solution to
a world risking destruction…is to destroy that world. Thus, they attempt to wring peace out of war,
a metaphor very clear to audiences in the Vietnam Era of “You have to destroy the village to save it.”
Still, this message does not
transmit nearly as powerfully as the anti-pollution message of the superior Godzilla
vs. Hedorah.
I would be a curmudgeon if I didn’t
note that the movie features some really fun battles.
That aforementioned Godzilla jump
kick, for instance, is just so bizarre, gravity-defying and over-the-top. I don’t know how it could elicit anything but
laughs, but it is a clear indicator that the films of this era have moved
definitively into fantasy territory.
I’m okay with that, because I
watch these films with my aforementioned seven year old, and he loves them with
unbridled passion. There is something so
imaginative and wondrous about these Godzilla films, I see that strict realism
isn’t necessary. I have seen with my own
eyes how even a movie that I don’t consider very good, like Godzilla
vs. Megalon, ignites Joel’s creative play. He loves the variety, powers and natures of
Godzilla’s adversaries.
In the final analysis, however,
this film looks like a TV pilot for a Jet Jaguar series, with Godzilla coming
in for a cameo tag team, and that fact doesn’t do the big green dragon any
favors.
People go to see Godzilla movies for Godzilla, and in some
critical sense, Godzilla vs. Megalon breaks (or at least severely stretches…) that
contract with the audience with its bait-and-switch strategy.
Thanksgiving Blogging: The War of the Gargantuas (1966)
It’s
no exaggeration to state that The War of the Gargantuas (1966) was
a staple of my childhood TV-watching.
The
Japanese monster movie -- released in America in 1970 -- aired frequently on our
local station WWOR Channel 9 in the 1970s and 1980s; sometimes on The
Million Dollar Movie, if memory serves.
Rightly
or wrongly, I have come to associate these viewings of The War of the Gargantuas
with the Thanksgiving holiday, or more accurately, the Friday after
Thanksgiving.
So
today, I decided to take a look back at the film. Until last week, I had not
seen The
War of the Gargantuas since a holiday in the early 1990s when I
introduced the film to my wife, Kathryn. We were at my grandparents’ house in
Tom’s River, N.J. for the Thanksgiving weekend, so the film may have been playing on basic cable.
The
War of the Gargantuas
stars Russ Tamblyn as Dr. Paul Stewart and is a sequel of sorts to Frankenstein
Conquers the World (1965). In particular, the film’s Gargantuas -- brown
and green -- were created from the cells of the Frankenstein Monster, which
were cast into the sea in the previous film.
And in Japanese, I believe, the creatures are referred to not as Gargantuas but as “Frankensteins.”
And in Japanese, I believe, the creatures are referred to not as Gargantuas but as “Frankensteins.”
Directed
by Ishiro Honda, with special effects from Eiji Tsubaraya, The War of the Gargantuas
concerns the attempts of several scientists to save the life of the non-violent
brown Gargantua, or Sanda, even while the Japanese Army plots the demise of the violent,
carnivorous green Gargantua, Gaira.
In
the end, nature does away with the giant monsters instead. But the film serves as a
meditation on the nature vs. nurture debate, comparing the wild, untamed Gaira
with the kindly Sanda, who knew human companionship.
Man’s
violent nature is discussed as well, since the Japanese Army refuses to
acknowledge the (obvious) differences between the gargantuan monsters, and goes forward with its
plan to kill them both with napalm.
“Is
it possible a gargantuan might exist?”
A
ship at sea is attacked by a giant octopus, and later, a giant green monster or
Gargantua.
The only survivor of the incident reports the attack, and the Japanese press runs with the story, asking Professor Paul Stewart (Tamblyn) and his associate Akemi (Kumi Mizuno) if such creatures could be real. The scientists know from experience that it is possible. Five years earlier, they cared for a gentle brown Gargantua, before it escaped from custody.
The only survivor of the incident reports the attack, and the Japanese press runs with the story, asking Professor Paul Stewart (Tamblyn) and his associate Akemi (Kumi Mizuno) if such creatures could be real. The scientists know from experience that it is possible. Five years earlier, they cared for a gentle brown Gargantua, before it escaped from custody.
The
Green Gargantua, Gaira, soon makes landfall at Tokyo Airport and does catastrophic
damage there. Later, the same beast attacks the patrons at a roof-top night-club, and is
repelled only by bright light.
The Japanese Army brings in maser tanks to annihilate Gaira, but at the last minute, the injured creature is rescued by Sanda, the brown Gargantua who has been living in peace in the Japanese Alps.
The Japanese Army brings in maser tanks to annihilate Gaira, but at the last minute, the injured creature is rescued by Sanda, the brown Gargantua who has been living in peace in the Japanese Alps.
Stwewart
surmises that the Gargantuas are offshoots from the same unknown cells, and therefore their cells may be able
to generate additional monsters.Alarmed, the Army plans to destroy Gaira and
Sanda, over Stewart and Akemi’s objections...
“We
were sunk by a hairy green giant.”
The
War of the Gargantuas explicitly references, at one point, the Biblical story of Cain and
Abel: the story of a man who murders his brother.
That tale roils underneath The War of the Gargantuas as Sanda and Gaira first discover one another, and eventually face off. Early in the film, Sanda saves Gaira from the Army and nurses him back to health after maser attack. But soon Sanda -- who was raised by humans -- sees that Gaira has killed and eaten a human boater. Sanda realizes that he can no longer protect his sibling, and nor should he. They fight it out, even though Sanda is peaceful and docile.
That tale roils underneath The War of the Gargantuas as Sanda and Gaira first discover one another, and eventually face off. Early in the film, Sanda saves Gaira from the Army and nurses him back to health after maser attack. But soon Sanda -- who was raised by humans -- sees that Gaira has killed and eaten a human boater. Sanda realizes that he can no longer protect his sibling, and nor should he. They fight it out, even though Sanda is peaceful and docile.
The other set of “brothers” in the film -- mirroring this monster dynamic -- are human scientists and soldiers. The scientists, like Sanda, are peaceful and docile, hoping to investigate the crisis and save the more peaceful of the two Gargantuas. The soldiers, by contrast (and not entirely unlike Gaira...) are bound and determined to destroy anything they deem a threat, including the innocent Sanda.
Like the Gargantuas, scientists and soldiers possess “the same blood, the same cell structure,” and yet are incredibly different.The movie points out the hypocrisy of the Army's higher-ups. They are bound and determined to kill both Gargantuas, even without cause, even though they are acting in a murderous fashion, like Gaira.
But brothers are supposed to be responsible for brothers, right?
In
the end, the Gargantuas are put down not by each other, or by the auspices of
man, but by an underwater volcanic eruption. Though spurred by a helicopter
bombing, this eruption is the “other” key player in the film’s action: Mother
Nature, or God, if you will.
The Gargantuas -- as Frankenstein Monsters and creations of man -- are “unnatural” creations. Therefore, it is only proper that nature remove them. But had monster movie history been a little different, however, Sanda and Gaira would have likely returned in another film, perhaps to battle Godzilla himself.
The Gargantuas -- as Frankenstein Monsters and creations of man -- are “unnatural” creations. Therefore, it is only proper that nature remove them. But had monster movie history been a little different, however, Sanda and Gaira would have likely returned in another film, perhaps to battle Godzilla himself.
On my recent screening of the film, I was pleasantly surprised by the effetive and atmospheric opening of
the film. Like so many Japanese monster movies, The War of the Gargantuas opens
with a ship at sea during a storm, and an attack by a giant monster.
This time, that monster is a huge, menacing octopus,
and the scene is very well-shot. The
punctuation of the scene is a surprise too. Gaira
dispatches the octopus so that we think he is a hero, but then Gaira proceeds to
attack the ship himself. Out of the
frying pan, into the fire.
Later, in a scene that is a little shocking to behold, we see Gaira pursuing the swimming survivors from the ship. He plucks them out of the water and eats them.
Later, in a scene that is a little shocking to behold, we see Gaira pursuing the swimming survivors from the ship. He plucks them out of the water and eats them.
The
scene I most remembered from the film is set at a night club, where an American
singer croons “The Words Get Stuck in My Throat,” unaware that Gaira is
creeping up in the background, behind her.
The movie misses a genuine opportunity, in my opinion, because the singer doesn’t get eaten (or stuck in Gaira’s throat...). That would have been a wicked (and nasty) joke but The War of the Gargantuas is a sincere entertainment and doesn’t tread into camp, at least intentionally. Still, it's hard not to giggle at the sea captain's cry that his vessel was attacked by a hairy green giant.
The movie misses a genuine opportunity, in my opinion, because the singer doesn’t get eaten (or stuck in Gaira’s throat...). That would have been a wicked (and nasty) joke but The War of the Gargantuas is a sincere entertainment and doesn’t tread into camp, at least intentionally. Still, it's hard not to giggle at the sea captain's cry that his vessel was attacked by a hairy green giant.
On
this viewing of the film, I also admired how the filmmakers set up and exploited the comparison between Gaira
and Sanda.
Gaira is a vicious, inhuman thing that has never known love or companionship. By nature, he may have the potential to love, but he has never been nurtured. He sees human beings only as food, biting their heads off first, apparently. This is terrifying to watch, and I remember, as a kid, being scared by Gaira.
There's a moment in the film when a fisherman looks down into the sea, and there -- below the surface -- is Gaira, just waiting to spring. That moment offers some good old fashioned nightmare fodder, and Gaira represents nature gone wild, untamed and undisciplined.
Gaira is a vicious, inhuman thing that has never known love or companionship. By nature, he may have the potential to love, but he has never been nurtured. He sees human beings only as food, biting their heads off first, apparently. This is terrifying to watch, and I remember, as a kid, being scared by Gaira.
There's a moment in the film when a fisherman looks down into the sea, and there -- below the surface -- is Gaira, just waiting to spring. That moment offers some good old fashioned nightmare fodder, and Gaira represents nature gone wild, untamed and undisciplined.
Sanda was raised by humans,
however, and therefore understands love, companionship, and even
brotherhood. That latter quality,
brotherhood, is the very thing that Sanda seeks with Gaira, perhaps to alleviate a lonely,
or even solitary existence.
But Gaira simply can’t change his ways at this juncture, and is no doubt confused when his brother turns against him. Sanda, clearly, wishes events had turned out differently.
But Gaira simply can’t change his ways at this juncture, and is no doubt confused when his brother turns against him. Sanda, clearly, wishes events had turned out differently.
What
I didn’t admire so much about The War of the Gargantuas is the fact that the mid-movie battle between
Gaira and the Japanese Army seems to go on forever, and therefore lose some
visceral impact.
I fully realize that many nay-sayers disliked 2014’s Godzilla because there wasn’t a lot of monster-on-monster fighting in the film. The fights were used strategically, and mostly during the climax.
The War of the Gargantuas, however, validates that restrained approach.The battles here go on for so long, without relief, that they eventually become monumentally uninteresting.
It’s probably sacrilege to say this, but the fights could have been pruned back by a full-third, and the movie would have moved with more grace, purpose and drive. The first thirty minutes or so of The War of the Gargantuas in particular, are terrific, and the special effects (especially during the airport attack) hold up rather well.
Once the fighting takes center stage, however, The War of the Gargantuas feels like it is stuck in neutral. Long stretches of time go by where we just seem to be watching vehicles getting positioned, and masers firing.
I fully realize that many nay-sayers disliked 2014’s Godzilla because there wasn’t a lot of monster-on-monster fighting in the film. The fights were used strategically, and mostly during the climax.
The War of the Gargantuas, however, validates that restrained approach.The battles here go on for so long, without relief, that they eventually become monumentally uninteresting.
It’s probably sacrilege to say this, but the fights could have been pruned back by a full-third, and the movie would have moved with more grace, purpose and drive. The first thirty minutes or so of The War of the Gargantuas in particular, are terrific, and the special effects (especially during the airport attack) hold up rather well.
Once the fighting takes center stage, however, The War of the Gargantuas feels like it is stuck in neutral. Long stretches of time go by where we just seem to be watching vehicles getting positioned, and masers firing.
The
War of the Gargantuas is generally very well-regarded by fans, and I can detect why. Some feel
nostalgia for the film, because they grew up with it. Certainly, I'm in this camp.
Others have keyed in on, quite rightly, the human, affecting nature of these particular monsters. You don’t want the Gargantuas to kill each other or die, and yet, at the same time, that outcome feels inevitable.
All the best monster movies make audiences care about their creatures, one way or another. You either love them, hate them, or feel sorry for them.
On that front, The War of the Gargantuas absolutely succeeds, and all those emotions bubble to the surface. Sanda, in particular, is heart-breaking. He attempts to build a bridge to the human world (which includes brotherhood and compassion), and carry Gaira with him -- his own flesh and blood -- across it, but doesn't succeed.
His failure, one might say, is only human.
Others have keyed in on, quite rightly, the human, affecting nature of these particular monsters. You don’t want the Gargantuas to kill each other or die, and yet, at the same time, that outcome feels inevitable.
All the best monster movies make audiences care about their creatures, one way or another. You either love them, hate them, or feel sorry for them.
On that front, The War of the Gargantuas absolutely succeeds, and all those emotions bubble to the surface. Sanda, in particular, is heart-breaking. He attempts to build a bridge to the human world (which includes brotherhood and compassion), and carry Gaira with him -- his own flesh and blood -- across it, but doesn't succeed.
His failure, one might say, is only human.
Thanksgiving Blogging: Godzilla vs. The Bionic Monster (1974)
Released briefly in the United
States as Godzilla vs. The Bionic Monster before changing its title to Godzilla vs. The Cosmic Monster after
the rights-holders of the Six Million Dollar Man/Bionic Woman
franchise complained, this film is more widely known by the title Godzilla
vs. Mecha-Godzilla.
Here, there’s a significant air
of mystery as the kaiju action commences. Godzilla begins acting in
uncharacteristically destructive, violent and evil fashion, even attacking a
friend from Monster Island, the spiky Anguirus.
But it is soon revealed that evil
aliens who appear human but are really simian in nature (think Planet
of the Apes…) are behind the attack, using an impostor Godzilla -- the robotic Mecha-Godzilla -- and hoping
to conquer the Earth.
In this case, Godzilla requires
the assistance of King Caesar -- a kind of glowing dog/bat kaiju who has slumbered
for generations inside a mountain cave on Okinawa -- to defeat the aliens’ “ultimate weapon!”
Okinawan prophecy, re-counted by
the descendants of the royal family of Azumi Castle, foretells of a day when a
black mountain will appear, the sun shall rise in the west, and two monsters
will rise to defeat a grave threat to humanity.
The symbols of this prophecy
begin to come true in the late 20th century when aliens “from the third planet of the black hole,
outer space” land on Earth, and launch their cyborg, Mecha-Godzilla from
their underground base.
Godzilla rises from the sea to
stop his merciless and malevolent duplicate, but fails on the first
attempt.
Now, Princess Nami (Lin) must
sing a song from ancient Azumi history to wake the great King Caesar from his
longer slumber, to join forces with Godzilla and save the world.
Although King Caesar looks a bit
like a Muppet gone mad, Godzilla vs. The Bionic Monster
introduces one of the great villains of the Godzilla canon: the giant robot,
Mecha-Godzilla. This silver titan can
shoot missiles from its finger tips, and fire beams of energy that ravage
Godzilla.
Given the robot’s impressive
arsenal, perhaps it is not surprising that this is an especially gory
installment of the long-lived saga.
For example, in one scene red
blood veritably fountains out of Godzilla’s neck as Mecha-Godzilla
attacks.
In another scene, two aliens take
bullets to the head, and greed fluid bursts out of their wounds. In keeping with this more savage tone, the
evil alien leader is absolutely merciless in nature, ordering his giant cyborg,
at one point, to “beat Godzilla to
death!” rather than merely destroy him.
So the stakes are pretty high in
the film, and again, one feels while watching it that -- again, it’s almost
like a 1970s James Bond film. It comes replete with an evil-talking villain who
loquaciously shares his plans, and reveals his secret subterranean
headquarters. There are also the
requisite action sequences. In this case, Godzilla somehow transforms himself
into a “magnetic pole” during battle, and attracts Mecha-Godzilla to his scales. That’s a new one.
Similarly, there’s an “imposter”
Godzilla in the film’s opening, a reflection of certain Bond tropes seen in
series entries such as From Russia with Love (1963) and The
Man with The Golden Gun (1974).
Although this film is not as
strong as Godzilla vs. Hedorah since
it lacks the social context of that film and the 1954 original, it certainly
features a great villain and a unique guest-star in King Caesar. It’s always
nice to see Anguirus, as well.
One logical question does arise,
however: how did the Azumi family know this threat from space would come? What forces gave rise to the ancient prophecy?
Just think of the “second sight” necessary, in ancient days, to imagine aliens
from space, Godzilla, Anguirus, Mecha-Godzilla and aliens from space.
Otherwise, Godzilla vs. The Bionic Monster
is good fun, if occasionally absurd. The
moment when the alien leader spits out his home address (“the third planet of the black hole, outer space,”) is one example
of the latter. And you just have to love
the fact that the villain is such a trash-talker, always boasting about his
robot and seeking to diminish Godzilla’s chances.
Finally, it is also never
explained why the same supreme leader is always smoking a cigar and drinking
liquor.
Aren’t smoking and drinking human vices?
And simple human vices don’t seem
likely from an outer-space ape man who cackles his way through lines of
dialogue like “Goodbye, Stupid Earthlings...”
Thursday, November 24, 2016
Thanksgiving Blogging: Godzilla vs. Hedorah
One way to comprehend and
appreciate the Godzilla movies is to parse them as, essentially, the Japanese monster
equivalent of James Bond-styled movie adventures.
Thus, every Godzilla outing features
a different and dynamic antagonist and the same, dependable hero, Godzilla, who
faces this new threat or challenge. But in different eras, Godzilla is
interpreted differently, not unlike the varying interpretations of 007 by
actors Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Dalton, Brosnan and Craig. Sometimes Godzilla is friendlier, sometimes
less so. Sometimes he is silly, and
sometimes he is deadly serious.
The monster movies of the 1970s
Showa period are a great deal more fanciful in presentation than some.
They are more aptly fantasy
entries than outright horror shows, like the original Gojira. On a personal note, I admire and love
the Godzilla
films of the 1970s Showa Era, and their interpretation of Godzilla as a
reluctant warrior for mankind, not to mention hero of children everywhere.
One of the very best Godzilla
films ever made – of any era -- is Godzilla vs. Hedorah (1972), or Godzilla
vs. The Smog Monster as it was known in the United States upon release. The film works as both a compelling Godzilla
entry, and also as a science fiction film featuring a meaningful statement
about the environment.
Remember, the great kaiju movies,
in my opinion, are the ones that create monsters that are avatars for some
pressing issue in the human world, often atomic testing, and the notion of Mother
Nature’s revolt against that poor behavior.
Godzilla
vs. Hedorah creates a great monster, Hedorah,
out of the issue of pollution, which was a major component of the 1970s science
fiction film. Efforts from around the
world, including No Blade of Grass (1970), and Z.P.G. (1972) imagined
worlds in which our soiling of the planet led to catastrophic and apocalyptic
futures.
Hedorah possesses a unique and
fascinating life-cycle, which means that the monster adopts multiple forms in
the sea, on land and in the air, throughout the film, and that fact livens up
the battles with Godzilla quite a bit.
Godzilla
vs. Hedorah
also features at least one major sequence set during blackest night, and so
there is a dark aspect to this film that makes it memorable in the canon. The film also tailors its message of “saving
the Earth” so as to be appealing to children, who will recognize that Godzilla --
for all the damage he causes -- is on the side of the planet, and Mother Nature
herself.
A beast called Hedorah that
arises from “a sticky, dark planet far
away” is nurtured in the pollution, sewage, and detritus of Earth’s 20th
century civilizations.
The grotesque, blob-like entity
with red eyes develops and grows through three distinct stages -- in the ocean,
on the surface, and in the skies -- and soon proves a grave menace to human
life, especially in Japan.
When Hedorah flies above that
nation’s cities and factories, he excretes deadly sulfuric acid that burns away
skin and reduces human bodies to skeletal corpses.
Meanwhile, one boy, Kenny, dreams
of his hero, Godzilla, and believes that only the giant atomic lizard can save
the world from this terrible new threat.
Fortunately, the giant green
dinosaur soon shows up, and engages in a battle to the death with the smog
monster.
Going back for a minute to the
useful 007 Bond comparison, Godzilla vs. Hedorah opens with a catchy
pop tune, a lava-lamp-like introductory montage, and a musical performance by
an attractive female singer.
Similarly, the film also features
the obligatory almost stand-alone action set-pieces here…the ones in which the
protagonist first confronts the antagonist, and is defeated, and then the
climactic encounter, wherein good finally prevails.
Continuing down this road of
comparison further, the best way to judge or critique a Bond film, largely, is
to categorize the elements in terms of their antecedents and determine whether
the ingredients in the current entry stack-up to moments from franchise history.
Is the new movie as powerfully
vetted as past entries? Does it toss in some surprises to go along with the
elements that a devoted audience expects to see?
In terms of Godzilla vs. Hedorah, the
answers to such questions are universally affirmative.
Hedorah makes for a dangerous,
original, and grotesque villain, not merely in terms of his ever-changing
appearance, but also in terms of his abilities and proclivities. When the airborne Hedorah strafes his human
prey and sprays a toxic chemical, humans below are dissolved to bone instantly,
and it’s a frightening, grotesque effect. Another image of Hedorah that remains
unforgettable sees the beast perching atop a factory smoke-stack, imbibing
pollution directly from the pipe, as it were.
It seems to me that both Bond and
Godzilla films rise and fall on the basis of the villain’s nature and plans,
and Hedorah’s constantly shifting nature, nasty composition, gruesome power,
and odd appetite make him an unforgettable antagonist.
Godzilla
vs. Hedorah finds
some new subtext and social critique material for the long-standing
franchise. Historically, Godzilla has
been parsed as an avatar for atomic power. He owes his very existence in the 20th
century to human nuclear testing, and so forth.
In Godzilla vs. Hedorah,
however, the series gives him a villain who also symbolizes an important
element of the disco decade zeitgeist: pollution.
As seen in films such as
Frogs (1972) and Doomwatch (1976) environmental
pollution proved the great bugaboo of the age, and here, the alien seed that is
Hedorah sprouts from sewage and garbage strewn into the ocean. The opening scenes in the film depict smoke
stacks, factories, and filthy brown ocean water. We see, without fakery, examples of how man
has destroyed that which Nature has provided.
These moments are powerful because they are real. Man’s technology and
industry -- coupled with his propensity to destroy that which he touches – are turning
a paradise into a nightmare.
From this hot-house of detritus
emerges something unspeakably awful: the crimson-eyed menace from another
world. And when Hedorah sucks smoke out
of a factory stack like it’s a giant bong, the film’s powerful point is nailed
visually: we’re actually feeding the vehicle of our own destruction when we
pollute the Earth.
Commendably, the Godzilla series
has adjusted with the times to remain relevant and interesting. The nature of “the monster” has changed (from
nuclear power to rampant pollution and environmental damage), but the overall
premise hasn’t been altered at all. The
fact is, state these Japanese films, mankind’s behavior and irresponsibility
are jeopardizing everyone on the planet.
What makes Godzilla vs. Hedorah such
a charming and worthwhile film, however, is not necessarily the polemical
aspects of the drama. Contrarily, the film often adopts the viewpoint of a
child, who sees the pollution and wishes for some miracle to stop it.
That miracle is
named Godzilla.
“Godzilla would get really angry if he saw this. He’d do something,”
the child, Kenny, declares upon musing over pollution.
In this case, the child seeks an
answer to a problem, and hopes for a person (or creature) brave enough and bold
enough to take action. The film actually
forges a meaningful link between this boy and Godzilla, suggesting that
Godzilla can hear his hopes and thoughts, and thus comes to the rescue of humanity.
Kenny hopes that Godzilla will
fix by might that which man chooses not to address.
Furthering the idea of the film
as originating from a child’s viewpoint, Godzilla vs. Hedorah often cuts to a
cartoon representation of the sludge monster, perhaps in an attempt to maintain
the whimsical aspects of the tale, especially in counter-balance to some of the
unexpectedly gruesome special effects.
Finally, the film even features a
great (if idealistic) answer to the problem of pollution: “if everyone pulls together, we can defeat it.”
If we can just do that one thing, Godzilla will not gaze
down upon us with such disapproval in his eyes, as he does in the coda of this
particular outing.
Another real treat here is the
fact that Godzilla vs. Hedorah is beautifully-shot. The compositions make full use of film’s
rectangular frame, and some vistas -- even
those featuring an obviously mini-metropolis and dueling men-in-suits --
remain visually impressive. There's a downright lyrical moment near the end of the film when Godzilla stands before a sunset, and the implication seems to be that it is mankind's reign itself that is setting, unless we change our ways.
Perhaps some of the ideas here --
like a peace march to stop pollution
-- seem dated in the cold light of the cynical 21st century, but Godzilla
vs. Hedorah, with its child-like innocence and focus on a real 1970s “monster”
--pollution -- works just about as poetically
and effectively as any Godzilla movie ever made in my opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Shatner Week: Kingdom of the Spiders (1977)
Okay. So perhaps this movie is a guilty pleasure. Or perhaps I simply harbor deep-seated feelings of nostalgia for this "revenge of na...













































