One of the horror genre's "most widely read critics" (Rue Morgue # 68), "an accomplished film journalist" (Comic Buyer's Guide #1535), and the award-winning author of Horror Films of the 1980s (2007), The Rock and Roll Film Encyclopedia (2007) and Horror Films of the 1970s (2002), John Kenneth Muir, presents his blog on film, television and nostalgia, named one of the Top 100 Film Studies Blog on the Net.
Wednesday, September 16, 2015
The Shyamalan Series: The Happening (2008)
I think that I shall never see
A poem lovely as a tree.
A tree whose hungry mouth is prest
Against the earth's sweet flowing breast;
A tree that looks at God all day,
And lifts her leafy arms to pray...
-Alfred Joyce Kilmer
I quoted that poem, above, in my original blog review
Happening(2008) some seven
Much like Roger Ebert at the time, I enjoyed this M. Night Shyamalan film on my theatrical viewing. I found it surprisingly gory and nihilistic and
also refreshingly off-beat in a season that brought us a lot of CGI superhero
It was only as the weeks, months, and years passed
that the film’s reputation as a laughingstock took on a breathing, pulsing life of its own. The Happening was widely pilloried, mocked, and dismissed.
Today, it exists as a wonderful punch-line: a movie so "bad" that one can't possibly defend it.
Mark Wahlberg as a science teacher? Scared humans
attempting to out-run the wind? Plants communicating with people?
For those seeking to take down the film and its
director, M. Night Shyamalan, there is plenty of ammunition here by which to
accomplish that task. Many folks have availed themselves of it.
And, I’ll confess,
after watching the film for the first time again in seven years, I can see that
it is a marked step down in quality for Shyamalan, after his earlier work. Some scenes just don’t come off well, and some
scenes that should be powerful instead fall flat
But -- perhaps stubbornly -- I still feel there is some value in The Happening.
The late Mr. Ebert’s prophetic thoughts in his review, are similar to my
own. He wrote:
“I suspect I’ll be in the minority praising this film. It
will be described as empty, uneventful, meandering. But for some, it will weave
a spell. It is a parable, yes, but it is also simply the story of these people
and how their lives and existence have suddenly become problematic. We depend on
such a superstructure to maintain us that one or two alterations could leave us
stranded and wandering through a field, if we are that lucky.”
Specifically, there are three qualities that help me register The
Happening as a promising film, even a worthwhile one, in the face of all the steaming piles of negative criticism.
The first such quality is that the film stands tall as perhaps the nastiest, meanest, most grotesque of all Shyamalan’s cinematic works. Some of the film's imagery (like the shot below), seems deliberately designed to rattle our cages, to bring back the national psychological trauma of 9/11,
A few moments near the start of the film are actually down-right vicious, and represent an out-and-out horror sensibility that we have not really
seen from this director before, even in The Sixth Sense (1999).
Similarly, the film's coda -- in which another "happening" begins -- is well-in-keeping with familiar nihilistic horror tropes (namely George A Romero's refrain, "what's it going to take to change us?")
I certainly wouldn’t mind if Shyamalan returned to this darker, grimmer brand of filmmaking in The Visit, staging gory deaths with
relish and even going for some dark gallows humor.
Secondly, as much as viewers and critics guffawed over the idea of people
communicating with plants and plants emitting deadly neuro-toxins, there is, actually, a
basis for fact in some of these ideas, and I enjoy how Shyamalan utilizes the
concepts to tell his story of man's denialism. Basically, plants get fed up and reject humans, deciding that our “sprawl” on the planet is now a mortal threat
to their survival.
So the movie qualifies, perhaps, as the strangest revenge of
nature film ever made.
I enjoy revenge
of nature movies, especially those of the 1970s -- like William Girdler's Day of the Animals
(1977) -- and The Happening is undoubtedly a call-back; Day of the Trees, or Day of the Plants. It’s not as if there are no genre
antecedents or precedents for what Shyamalan has wrought here. He’s not “out of
line” with traditional sci-fi thinking, as so many critics seem to believe. On the contrary, his film fits into a
tradition of some great revenge of nature films (The Birds), some effective ones (Kingdom
of the Spiders) and some terrible ones (Night of the Lepus).
Thirdly, we must return to the wise Mr Ebert’s comment about The
Happening weaving a spell.
are moments in the film -- particularly the nasty ones -- that are downright
mesmerizing, even trance-like in presentation. Even in vetting what some viewers obviously consider a poorly-conceived
film or narrative, Shyamalan is impressive in his compositions and staging. There’s a fatalistic waiting-for-the-other-shoe-(or body…)-to-drop
aspect of some death scenes here that prove nothing less than chilling.
Of course, there are the deficits to describe too.
The primary of which -- nothing personal intended -- involves casting.
Mark Wahlberg and Zooey Deschanel, as a couple, are a big step
down from Bruce Willis and Olivia Williams in The Sixth Sense, Bruce
Willis and Robin Wright in Unbreakable, and Bryce Dallas Howard
and Joaquin Phoenix in The Village.
By comparison, their characters -- Eliot and Alma Moore -- come across
as superficial and silly. Wahlberg can
be a remarkable screen presence (see: Dirk Diggler in Boogie Nights , or The
Departed), but he typically doesn’t do well with genre material (see: Planet
of the Apes ) that requires him to come across as a deep
I’m not saying the guy is
stupid. He wouldn’t be where he is right
now -- an international star -- if that were the case. I’m only suggesting that Wahlberg
doesn’t typically project intelligence (or more accurately, intellect...) in a way that I find convincing or
Deschanel also seems grievously miscast, too
young, big-eyed, callow and distant to be a successful repository for audience
In a way, The Happening reveals how deeply M.
Night Shyamalan relies on good actors to transmit his spiritual, humanistic narratives. Bruce Willis, Mel Gibson, Bryce Dallas Howard,
Samuel L. Jackson, and Paul Giamatti all bring their “A” game to his films, and
their presence lifts the material.
in honesty, claim that Wahlberg and Deschanel accomplish the same feat. As casting falls under the director’s
purview, I am not letting Shyamalan off the hook here, or looking to cast blame
on someone else. I’m just noting that the film’s characters never reach the level of reality or familiarity
that they ought to; and that Shyamalan’s characters achieve in other films.
A lot of people will tell you that The Happening is a
full-fledged disaster and that it represents the final death of Shyamalan’s
career, with later films The Last Airbender (2011) and After
Earth (2013) simply kicking the corpse a few more times.
As you might expect, I disagree.
Although The Happening doesn’t
feature to a significant degree the themes of Shyamalan’s earlier works -- a
character discovering his or her destiny, and a commentary on the nature of
storytelling -- the film’s deficits have nonetheless been exaggerated to a
There are aspects of
the film that succeed, even if, I would have to agree that The
Happening is, perhaps, the least pleasing and least artistically
successful of Shyamalan’s projects.
Still, I can’t bring myself to hate it, or dismiss it out of
hand. I still see beauty and creativity in
aspects of it.
And when I go back and read the
extremely hostile reviews, I don’t necessarily blame Shyamalan for trying
something unique and falling short.
I think, instead, much like Alma in the film: “Can you believe how crappy people are?”
appears to be an event happening.”
A high-school science teacher Eliot Moore (Mark
Wahlberg) who is estranged from his wife, Alma (Zooey Deschanel), learns at
school of a strange happening on the East coast.
York City, citizens have begun to kill themselves, their self-preservation
switch flipped off by some compound or toxin
As this strange happening spreads, the couple
flees Philadelphia with a math teacher and friend, Julian (John Leguizamo) and
his young daughter.
Then the “attack” strikes their city, and they
evacuate on a train. Julian
heads to Princeton to find his missing wife, and doesn't survive the trip.
The others continue to flee, to ever smaller
population circles, as the entire North East is decimated by an attack that
seems to be carried on the wind, but which originates not with foreign
fighters...but with Mother Nature; with plants.
“We just lost contact…with everyone.”
Who would have guessed that the world would end with
a whimper instead of a bang? That's just one intriguing idea you may reckon with if you take The Happening on its own terms. Doomsday comes for man not with tanks or nukes, but at the hand of something he takes for granted: Mother Nature.
In The Happening, man's destruction --
his destiny -- is carried like a whisper on the wind. After we see turbulent
clouds roiling in the sky, people begin to behave strangely in Central Park. They stop, confused, acted upon some unseen
force, and begin to kill themselves in horribly violent ways.
One woman on a
park bench stabs herself with a hair-pin.
Later, at a construction site, bodies fall from skyscrapers in a sudden
deluge. The ghoulish punctuation of this death scene involves the passage of a
hand-gun from person to person, used in one suicide, then another, then another. Shyamalan’s camera stays trained on the gun,
not the final bloody act, as shots punctuate the soundtrack and bodies crumple.
Despise The Happening to your heart's content, but these opening sequences are brilliantly orchestrated, revealing to the audience how
reason, and indeed self-preservation, no longer matters to those affected by
the neurotoxin. Again, it’s worthwhile
to note that Shyamalan has never been so nasty in his imaginings before,
tossing characters off ledges, and staging execution/suicides like some wicked game of
A later scene in the film is just as ghoulish, and dark. It depicts scared
survivors of the "happening" using heavy weaponry to blow away two innocent children
who happen to be knocking on their front door.
Rather than help these kids, the unseen
murderers resort quickly to bloody violence, and again, Shyamalan doesn’t shy away from
the gore, or the horror of the scenario.
In this case, the point is clearly that man faces problems besides having
his “self-preservation” mechanism flipped by a neurotoxin.
Some humans are also clearly impacted by another devastating "plague" - lack of a necessary conscience, a lack of empathy for others. Who could murder kids at point blank range? Again, we must ponder that no other film of Shyamalan seems so hopeless about humanity.
The horror scenes in The Happening work just
fine, and, indeed, are necessary. Plants
and toxins carried on the wind are not suitable villains, really, in terms of visualization. They can’t walk or talk. They can’t shoot or
stab people. So Shyamalan goes whole hog into the self-inflicted and human-against-huan violence to showcase their impact. His sense of gallows
humor appears in other scenes too.
At one point, when Eliot and his group are visiting a model home in the
countryside – a symbol of human encroachment on nature -- a sign reads, on screen: “You Deserve This!”
That comment could be interpreted two ways.
It is meant to be an ad signifiying that customers deserve the comfort and leisure
of the model house. At the same time, it is a notice that humanity “deserves”
what it gets because of its poor stewardship of the wild, and of the planet as
Again, this isn’t typically a side of Shyamalan
that we see at the movies, so it The Happening, especially in its opening sequence, is a
refreshing change of pace. Or perhaps it might be considered a development (or evolution) of the dark ideas he has carried in his films, but not
really depicted head-on. The early scenes in New York City and Philadelphia give the film the gut-kick
that it needs, the visceral punch that keeps viewers on the edge of their seat for much of the running time.
When I talk about an over-the-top or exaggerated
response to The Happening, it’s much like the response to the
aliens-harmed-by-water subplot of Signs (2002). Specifically, many critics and viewers
apparently can’t bring themselves to suspend disbelief in the film’s central
idea that plants are rebelling against the human race.
Yet it is helpful to remember that a plant
revolution or attack on humanity is not a new idea in the genre.
classics like Day of the Triffids (1961), for example. The Happeningtakes on an idea that has been
explored in the sci-fi genre for generations (notably inOne Step Beyond's"Moment of Hate" andSpace:1999's"The Troubled Spirit,” to name
two TV series.
And as I noted in my intro, the film also qualifies as
a revenge of nature horror movie, in the spirit of efforts likeFrogs(1972),Kingdom of
andDay of the Animals(1977). You know this meme by heart if
you love horror movies: man's pollution causes nature to go haywire in response
Perhaps the closest antecedent forThe Happeningis Alfred Hitchcock's masterpiece, The
as you will recall, a swarm of birds suddenly and inexplicably went on the
attack and nearly took out an entire town. There was no explanation for the
battle and the bird assault ended as mysteriously as it began.
The Happening provides an
explanation (and you can judge whether that’s a good or bad thing, but just
imagine if Shyamalan had provided no explanation for the attack…), and also a
warning that the attacks will recur until mankind changes his ways. This final warning is the oft-seen "call-to-action" element of revenge of nature films; the warning that we are tampering in God’s
domain, or that it’s not nice to fool with Mother Nature. The Happening therefore fits into a pre-existing movie tradition, and is not an exception to tradition or history, as some would
have you believe.
And what of the film’s science?
Well consider some of the plot elements. It has been scientifically proven that plants do respond to human stimulus, so that
aspect of the film is factual (and indeed, this idea goes back to that One Step
Beyond episode I mentioned above…)
Similarly, science has proven that plants
can emit toxic compounds.
Where I would
suggest the movie gets into some problems with plausibility is its discussion of evolution. Individual populations don’t evolve, only species evolve over time.If I read the
film right, it seems to suggest that plants have just evolved, individually and collectively, to turn on humans, and that doesn’t seem to have any basis in reality, or in
our current understanding of science. Similarly, I wonder if there isn't a difference between having your self-preservation switch turned off, and actively trying to kill yourself. In other words, you might have no sense of danger, yet still not stick knitting needles in your throat.
But you know, for a Hollywood science fiction
film, The Happening isn't especially or egregiously off base. Especially when you accept what passes for science in other major
films. Let us not forget that Superman
opens a singularity (essentially a black hole) over Metropolis in Man of Steel
(2014) but doesn’t have a plan to close it. Oopsy.
And Star Trek: Into Darkness (2013) seems to think that cold fusion can be used
to transform lava into ice.
So, once more, it
is telling, I think, that Shyamalan’s films are held to a standard that other
genre films clearly are not.
question is: why?
Why do we punish an individual filmmaker, working
on a much smaller budget, for his creative trespasses, but forgive big franchise
moviemakers for theirs?
Understanding the response
to The Happening hinges on this issue.
Is The Happening really that ridiculous?
Not all the time. No.
But in at least one scene, yeah, it is. I have to admit it.
The scene in which Elliot approaches and
attempts to soothe a house plant is a perfect storm of dreadfulness. Mark Wahlberg
is terrible in this scene, talking calmly and sing-songily to the plant, which turns out to be plastic. When people say the movie is bad, I'm certain that this is the moment they most vividly remember.
Finally, I feel no shame in acknowledging that for
portions of it run, The Happening is, indeed, compelling. Even if you choose to
laugh at it, there’s a part of you that will watch, hoping to know where it
goes, what it means, and how it will end.
The film carries a commendable aura of impending, escalating doom,
buttressed by all the gory deaths. Furthermore, the film’s best actor, John
Leguizamo -- who should have been Elliot -- portrays a character who sees his
end coming from a distance, and his performance is haunting and memorable.
His whole emotional subplot works better than Alma's, and we never even meet Julian's wife. We never believe Alma is having an affair -- and she isn't -- and so her story ends happily, with trust in the marriage restored. It feels like a false or manufactured crisis.
I’ve received and duly read the memo that we’re all supposed to treat The Happening like a joke, in perpetuity, but let me say this: There’s
nothing to be gained by taking that route in this review.
There are plenty of
reviews which dismiss, bash, and make-fun of the film all over the net. Read and enjoy them! I won’t be a part of that mob mentality. Instead, I'll continue to insist that The Happening is an entertaining and
ambitious film that could have been, without a doubt, much, much better.
But, The Happening starts strong and ends
strong. In terms of the denouement, the film reveals a human race in complete
denial, having learned no lessons about its treatment of the planet.
Even with characters outrunning the wind, and talking to plastic plants, that close-up look at blind, foolish denialism is as realistic and powerful -- and prophetic? -- as any "monster" in any science fiction film ever made.