“Eve”
is our X-Files episode of the week as we continue to celebrate the 20th
anniversary of the classic Chris Carter TV series. This eleventh episode of the fledgling series
was penned by Kenneth Biller and Chris Brancato, and directed by Fred Gerber.
“Eve”
commences as Scully (Gillian Anderson) and Mulder (David Duchovny) fly to
Greenwich, Connecticut to investigate the death of a suburban man who was
drained of blood. Mulder suspects alien
abduction is behind the murder, citing examples of cattle-mutilations with a
similar modus operandi. At first, the only witness, young Teena
Simmons (Sabrina Krievans), seems to obliquely corroborate this theory.
When
an identical murder occurs in Marin County, California, however, and the only
witness is a dead ringer for Teena, little Cindy Reardon (Erica Krievans). Scully and Mulder realize that they are
looking not at an alien abduction case, but a case involving illicit
experiments in in-vitro fertilization.
While
Scully investigates the activities of a doctor named Sally Kendrick (Harriet
Sansom Harris) at the Luther Stapes fertility clinic, Mulder learns more on the
subject from his covert government informant, Deep Throat (Jerry Hardin).
Deep
Throat reveals a top-secret genetic experiment of the 1950s called “The
Litchfield Project” that was designed to compete with a similar eugenics program
in the Soviet Union. The goal was to
breed a new race of super-soldiers. The
American version of the project created a number of “Adams” and “Eves,” all
identical, all incredibly-intelligent…and all homicidal.
After
visiting with the incarcerated Eve 6 (Sansom Harris) at the Whiting Institute
for the Criminally Insane, Scully and Mulder realize that Eve 7 and Eve 8 may still
be free, and even attempting to kill Cindy and Teena, the grandchildren of the
program, essentially.
Unfortunately,
their suspicions prove absolutely wrong, and Teena and Cindy prove to be far
more cunning adversaries than either F.B.I. agent could have possibly
predicted.
At
the heart of “Eve” is a well-worn horror trope involving evil children. In the 1950s, the movie The Bad Seed famously
raised a crucial issue regarding diabolical children: nature or nature?
Could
a child be evil by dint of the genetic material passed on from his or her parents?
Or did that evil arise out of the manner in which he or she was raised?
The
X-Files
takes that notion a step further – and straight into the post-modern 1990s --
by noting that an evil child might actually be
designed so by over-reaching
scientists run amuck. Although the twins possess superior intellect and
cunning, these girls were not gifted with a superior sense of morality, and
that fact makes them monsters.
Didn’t
the scientists ever stop to think about morality? How about mere emotional stability?
The
1990s was indeed a perfect time to re-visit the notion of evil children, and
accordingly a few horror movies of the era did so, including The
Good Son (1993). The reason this
issue was so timely a concern involves the development, in 1990, of the Human Genome Project, an initiative
designed to map fully our DNA.
In
terms of the horror genre and its development, this scientific project was
every bit as important, creatively, as was the Manhattan Project to an earlier
era. In both cases, creative artists
explored the notion that “tampering in God’s domain” could effectively destroy
mankind. By harnessing the atom in the
1940s, and by mapping the human genome in the 1990s, mankind was opening
“Pandora’s Box.” The “real” monster in
“Eve” is thus wanton genetic experiment, vetted without a controlling, moral
authority.
The
Krievan twins portray Teena and Cindy here, and do a remarkable job. They play their roles, at first, as though
everything happening to the girls is observed from some great emotional distance.
They are disassociated from the horrific and monstrous things happening around
them.
Late
in the episode, we understand that this distance arises from a lack of empathy. The deaths of their foster-fathers means
nothing to the girls, emotionally-speaking, and their almost blank facades
embodies not shock, but mere boredom.
In
the finale, when the audience learns their true nature, the twins finally reveal
a new aspect: childish glee in their anti-social activities. To the very end,
Teena and Cindy try to manipulate others with their childish appearances. “We
didn’t do anything wrong,” they insist, “we’re just little girls…”
The
distance between Teena and Cindy’s youthful appearance and their evil acts is
one factor that makes this episode so chilling, and therefore so
successful. There’s something deeply
disturbing about children who are disconnected from their emotions, and also,
deceitful and manipulative.
Again
and again in the episode, Scully and Mulder make mistakes because they can’t
quite reckon with the idea that these little girls could possibly be monsters. They can’t make the leap that appearance
isn’t reality.
Interestingly,
“Eve” doesn’t end without an important, if brief glance towards the “nurture”
end of the eternal debate about children.
Cindy’s mother, after learning of her daughter’s evil behavior,
completely abandons her. She cuts her off. She rips up her photograph of Cindy and burns
it in a fire. This is not the act of a
loving mother, even one whose child has acted badly.
Call
this the Frankenstein Principle. We make life in our own image, but when
we don’t like that image, we dismiss that life as “monstrous.” Suddenly, it’s not a part of the family
anymore. It can never be spoken of
aloud…just burn all the photographs in
the fireplace.
This
act or purging a family member, depicted in the finale of “Eve,” suggests that
Cindy and Teena aren’t the only ones who lack empathy, and perhaps that
“missing” factor is indeed a matter of nurture.
If
these girls had been raised in loving homes, would they have resorted to
murder, even factoring in the genetic predisposition towards instability?
In
terms of the character development, “Eve” is a necessary piece of The
X-Files puzzle for a few reasons.
I often read other critical evaluations of the series, and some
reviewers have complained (loudly) that the series is not actually concerned
with the science vs. belief battle, but rather with a strange kind of faith in
which Mulder is always right, a priori,
no matter what. These critics see Mulder
as unrealistic. They term him infallible,
always able to guess what is happening and deduce correctly the solution to a
mystery.
As
a reviewer, I don’t see this as a legitimate complaint about the series, and
could point to “Eve” as Exhibit A refuting it.
Here,
the episode begins with Mulder hell-bent on proving a case of alien
abduction. He discusses missing time (a
call-back to the pilot episode), cattle-mutilations and the like. He obsesses over the idea of a “red cloud” in
the sky on the day of the crime. Young
Teena – sensing Mulder’s desire to reach a pre-ordained conclusion -- plays
into his vanity and supports Mulder’s reading of the investigation. She is doing this merely to trick him and
throw him off the scent.
As
the investigation unravels, Mulder realizes he is barking up the wrong tree,
and drops his theory, as any smart investigator concerned with the facts
rightly would. The conclusion to draw
here is that he saw a commonality between a contemporary case and some old case
in his X-Files, but that the lead didn’t pan out.
So,
already -- just ten episodes in --
the series is proving that Mulder can
be wrong, and in his zealousness to be right, even make mistakes. This quality makes him a fallible and
interesting protagonist, not the kind of “infallible” master detective I’ve
seen him described as in other reviews. His viewpoint is not constantly
validated.
There’s
also a very nice, very effective moment in “Eve” that plays upon audience
expectations and desires regarding the Scully/Mulder relationship. Scully and Mulder have “rescued’ the two
girls, and are unaware of their true, homicidal natures. They decide to take care of the girls, and
drive them to their next destination. On
the long road trip, the girls need to use the bathroom, and Mulder, slightly
annoyed, pulls over at a rest-stop restaurant.
With
a slight smile, Scully takes the two girls to the bathroom with her, while
Mulder gets their order of four sodas.
While he uses the rest-room, one of the girls poisons two of the sodas,
the ones meant for the F.B.I. agents.
There’s
a great dramatic conflict in this scene between what Scully and Mulder (and a
waitress) believe is happening, and
what is actually happening.
Scully
and Mulder are knowingly playing Mom and Dad, and seem to recognize it…and even
enjoy the roleplaying a little. That
waitress thinks Mulder is the twins’ dad, and says so.
As
viewers tantalized by the Mulder/Scully relationship, we too are pulled into
this world of sudden parentage, though we know better. Despite our knowledge, we are suddenly
contextualizing these folks in terms of a “family,” something that has
explicitly always been denied the original Adams and Eves.
Then,
of course, the illusion is shattered, and Mulder realizes at the last moment
that the girls have poisoned the sodas.
It’s a wonderful moment when he realizes the truth, and realizes, fully,
how successfully the girls can play on the illusion that they are made of sugar
and spice and everything nice…plus, apparently, a healthy dollop of foxglove.
A
tense, intriguing, and fun episode, “Eve” is another bonafide victory for the
first season team. In terms of The
X-Files canon, it points towards the series’ obsession with genetic
experimentation and research. “Eve” is
sort of the tip of that iceberg on that front, and the theme will return in a
big way in later seasons, though in a more intimate fashion that affects Scully
and Mulder directly.
“Eve”
thus represents a promise of things to come -- and another indicator of past
government malfeasance -- rather than a direct connection to the overarching Mytharc.
Next
Week: “Beyond the Sea.”








I always hated that criticism of Mulder's a priori knowledge too John. Mulder was also definitively wrong in Squeeze, when midway through explaining to Scully how she's wrong about Tooms wanting to return to the scene of his crime, he is found in an air vent. It's a criticism that absolutely doesn't hold up on inspection, and is merely the product of lazy writing.
ReplyDeleteNice write-up, looking forward to Beyond The Sea!
Hi Jez,
DeleteThank you for your comment!
That argument about Mulder, which has proliferated widely online, actually has no basis in fact given the actual text of the episodes, in my opinion. The argument has the veneer of plausibility, I suppose, which is why it gets repeated. But it is wrong, wrong, wrong and not borne out by the details or specifics of the individual episodes. Strange how these ideas, not supported by reality,get started and then repeated...
All my best,
John
Intellectually lazy criticism. The creators, early on, made the viewer quite aware that Mulder was an exceptionally gifted investigator. Tops in his fields and unusually perceptive. Those that make this criticism seem to want Mulder bumbling and stumbling around like Dennis Franz's airport cop in 'DieHard 2.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Mulder is not just walking into these cases cold, with no knowledge of what's going on. It's not 'CSI'. While the perception is that Mulder comes off like Sherlock Holmes, in reality, he often has information that local authorities just do not have and thus bypasses the common investigative techniques.
It's just not a sound criticism and if the viewer is closesly following the narrative of the show.
This is one of my favorite episodes of the season (and maybe the series). The first time I watched it, I was completely taken in by the little girls and the innocence. As more pieces fell into place, I kept thinking the whole thing was going to be a huge double cross. Those little girls couldn't be evil - they just couldn't be. But they were and I loved it.
ReplyDeleteYou know when Cindy's mother burns the picture, I think there is more going on there than simply "not the act of a loving mother. Even one whose child has acted badly." It's not like Cindy just spilled some milk on the carpet, or broke a window.
This child murdered her "father". We see Cindy's mother's distress over the loss of her husband, obviously they were a very close couple. To find out that the child was not only a murderer, a deceiver and then not even really her child - well I think the burning of the picture is more of symbolic destruction of the pure evil that destroyed her life. Cindy took everything away from her "mother", and didn't seem to care one way or the other. When your life is so completely destroyed, it would be hard to find even an atom of love for the monster who destroyed it.
I always hoped that the Eves would be revisited in a later episode. There was some serious potential there for the wicked gals. And as the episodes ends - they are back out there... somewhere. :)